Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -4,275. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 123,521–129,078 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 11:19
124,162
-65
16 Sept 2026, 01:42
124,227
-212
14 Sept 2026, 06:37
124,439
-102
12 Sept 2026, 18:02
124,541
-167
10 Sept 2026, 20:16
124,708
-200
7 Sept 2026, 18:14
124,908
-258
4 Sept 2026, 21:55
125,166
-138
3 Sept 2026, 09:03
125,304
-82
2 Sept 2026, 01:03
125,386
-274
1 Sept 2026, 00:25
125,660
-97
31 Aug 2026, 03:03
125,757
-89
30 Aug 2026, 03:44
125,846
-170
29 Aug 2026, 02:38
126,016
-50
27 Aug 2026, 23:12
126,066
-31
26 Aug 2026, 23:16
126,097
-33
25 Aug 2026, 22:14
126,130
-64
25 Aug 2026, 00:23
126,194
-143
23 Aug 2026, 09:56
126,337
-118
21 Aug 2026, 19:38
126,455
-77
20 Aug 2026, 18:13
126,532
first reading
Engagement
1,235 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.398%
avg views ÷ 124,162 subscribers
Avg views / post
494
792 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.935%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
792
of 1,235 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 568 of 792 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
1,235 (6 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
391,350
Reactions total
3,153
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Sept 2026, 10:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈50,500
Videos
≈6,490
Links
≈35,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
18m 28s
Average length
1m 41s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,069 reactions across 720 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,022
49.7%
👍
568
14.0%
🔥
403
9.90%
🏆
317
7.79%
⚡
141
3.47%
👀
136
3.34%
❤🔥
85
2.09%
👏
76
1.87%
🍾
60
1.47%
🫡
54
1.33%
💯
48
1.18%
🤩
32
0.786%
🕊
29
0.713%
🥰
29
0.713%
💊
23
0.565%
🍓
16
0.393%
🐳
15
0.369%
😎
8
0.197%
💘
5
0.123%
😇
1
0.025%
1 further kind
1
0.025%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 734 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,069 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 16 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
55
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.9%
Most on one post
24
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Whiplash347. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 16 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔺♦️🔺🔺🔺♦️♦️🔺🔺♦️
🔺♦️♦️♦️🔺🔺🔺🔺♦️
🇺🇸 EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE FROM TREASURY SECRETARY SCOTT BESSENT 🇺🇸
🦅🇺🇸 Patriots and global citizens: The transition into the Quantum Financial System (QFS) is no longer a promise - it is an active economic reality.
💵Every single TREASURY BANK TOKEN issued directly by the U.S. Department of the Treasury represents a master sovereign share backed by our national reserves.
🔺We have mathema…
🔺♦️ 🔺🔺🔺♦️♦️🔺🔺♦️
THE BIRTH OF TREASURY BANK:
THE ABSOLUTE QFS ERA HAS BEGUN
🇺🇸 DIRECT STATEMENT FROM TREASURY SECRETARY
SCOTT BESSENT
"Patriots and citizens of the world: The era of debt slavery and central bank manipulation is officially OVER.
For centuries, the hidden cabal used paper debt to keep humanity in chains. Today, under direct sovereign mandate, the U.S. Department of the Treasury is dismantling the old…
♦️♦️♦️🔺 🔺🔺🔺
🚀NEXUS INVESTOR PORTAL IS NOW LIVE
We’re excited to announce that the official NEXUS Investor Portal is now ready and available to our community.
♦️ www.stellaranga.com 🔺
‼️Simply enter your Stellar wallet address to access your personal NEXUS portfolio.
From the portal you can:
• View your ANGA holdings, tier and NEXUS rewards
• Explore all available NEXUS reward categories
• Choose and manage yo…
♦️🔤🔺🔤
🔺🔤🔺🔤🔺🔤🔺
🇦🇺 ANGA — AUSTRALIAN NEXUS GREAT AWAKENING
ANGA is built around a diversified Australian-focused reserve concept combining sovereign financial assets, precious metals, resources, infrastructure, property and productive investments.
At its heart is NEXUS — our vision for a new generation of interconnected systems designed to reduce dependence on conventional fuel, external energy, manual labour, main…
♦️♦️🔺♦️🔺 ♦️🔺🔺
♦️♦️ ♦️🔺🔺🔺
Today we had the opportunity to test our first ATM in our offices, and we’re happy to report that everything worked as expected. ✔️
So far, everything is looking very positive and we’re pleased with the progress being made.
We’re now awaiting the arrival of the remaining ATMs, and we’ll continue sharing updates as we move closer to the next stage of the rollout.🔜
🔺Help us keep the mome…
🏛 THE TEXAS VAULT IS OPEN. HERE IS HOW YOU CLAIM YOUR STAKE. 🇺🇸
We aren't selling digital vapor. We are delivering physical bullion, monthly Sound Money salaries, and sovereign institutional rights.
The math is simple: Acquire $LIBERS at 0.4 XLM, set your trustline once, and the bot instantly delivers your $LBRT bonuses. $LBRT is anchored at 1 XLM. You instantly double your purchasing power and pull your wealth out…
🚨 THE WINDOW IS CLOSING. SECURE YOUR PHYSICAL GOLD.
Patriots, the fiat dollar is dying, and the Liberty Reserve vault is emptying fast.
This is your final window to acquire $LIBERS at 0.4 XLM. Set your trustline once, and the Telegram bot instantly delivers your $LBRT bonuses—valued at 1 XLM. You double your purchasing power immediately.
But more importantly, you unlock real-world physical wealth:
💎 Monthly Sound …
🚨 STOP CHASING DIGITAL VAPOR. BUILD A PHYSICAL EMPIRE. 🚨
🇺🇸 WE DON'T SELL DREAMS. WE SELL STEEL, DIRT, AND 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ BLACK GOLD. 🇺🇸
While the rest of the market chases fake memecoins, Project TITAN is tokenizing the American industrial machine. Texas oil leases, heavy Caterpillar machinery, and private aviation. Real assets. Real revenue.
💥 THE MACHINE IS LIVE. 💥
Buy $TITAN at 0.5 XLM. Set your trustline once. The…
👑👑👑🔤1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ WEDNESDAY — 5 DAYS UNTIL MONDAY SNAPSHOT 👑👑👑
➡️➡️➡️➡️
The ledger is clean. All complaints resolved. 85+ eligible wallets. Institutions arriving. The foundation is built.
Now the real question: are you BUILDING or WATCHING?
The institutions are here. The brands are real. The infrastructure is mapped.
And you have 5 DAYS.
➡️➡️➡️➡️
0️⃣ THE MATH THAT DOESN'T WAIT
Tier 0 (100 B17 = 500 XLM) → X…
🚨 OFFICIAL DIRECTIVE: B17 SOVEREIGN INDEX IS NOW LIVE
➡️➡️➡️
The crypto market is broken. Fragmented. High-risk. Investors are forced to manually research and manage dozens of isolated tokens, hoping to pick a winner while dodging exit scams and parked domains.
WHAT IS B17❓
B17 is the world's first tokenized Sovereign Wealth Fund operating on the Stellar blockchain. It bundles premium, globally audited Real World A…
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,235 posts we hold for @Whiplash347. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What type of propriety are you looking for in Stellar City❓
⚡️Apartment33%
🏠House67%
🌳Land plot44%
💼Commercial real estate44%
🛒 Retail space22%
The shares total 210%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 16 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 90 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 67 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Whiplash347 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@bankofliquiditychat named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🎶 W.H.Grampa🎸 @WHGrampaChannel · 45,367 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 27 August 2026
Official Simon Parkes @simon_parkes · 113,136 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
Patrick Bouvier Kennedy @PatrickKennedy777 · 48,460 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 26 August 2026
Nicholas Veniamin @NicholasVeniamin · 92,283 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 August 2026
Shadow of Ezra @ShadowofEzra · 147,226 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
Intergalactic SpaceForce - Galactic Federation –Special Command @SpaceForceGalacticFederation · 57,402 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 23 August 2026
Princess Diana 👒 @PrincessDiana_Q · 60,615 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 22 August 2026
Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ] @CodeMonkeyZ · 126,157 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
il Donaldo Trumpo @RealDonaldoTrumpo · 155,981 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
loop_rm_3117211 @looP_rM_3117211 · 236 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 17 August 2026
Q NEWS OFFICIAL #WWG1WGA 💛🇺🇸 @QNewsOfficialTV · 82,487 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 18 August 2026
AMG-NEWS.COM @AMGNEWS2022 · 80,505 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 18 August 2026
GEORGENEWS @georgenews · 144,438 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
Julie Green Ministries @JULIEGREENMINISTRIES · 53,823 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 24 August 2026
Michael Jackson @M_JacksonQ · 70,797 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 20 August 2026
Charlie Ward & Friends @officialcharliewardfriends · 43,759 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 28 August 2026
Patriot Streetfighter @patriotstreetfighter · 71,852 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
John F. Kennedy Jr. @JFK_Q17 · 105,121 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 August 2026
Dan Scavino 🇺🇸 @DanScavino17 · 46,968 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
The General @GeneralMCNews · 144,492 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
Melissa Redpill - Freedom Force Battalion 🇺🇸 @freedomforcebattalion · 77,307 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 August 2026
Insider Paper @insiderpaper · 108,477 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
Julian Assange @JulianAssangeWiki · 162,545 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 August 2026
Dirt Road Discussions @DirtRoadDiscussion · 134,213 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 46 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WhipLash347” (@Whiplash347), 124,162 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Whiplash347.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.