International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -398. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,699–44,217 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 13:15
43,759
-29
16 Sept 2026, 09:01
43,788
-26
14 Sept 2026, 17:41
43,814
-27
13 Sept 2026, 06:37
43,841
-35
11 Sept 2026, 08:37
43,876
-19
8 Sept 2026, 12:39
43,895
-42
5 Sept 2026, 05:15
43,937
-7
2 Sept 2026, 08:56
43,944
-16
1 Sept 2026, 06:36
43,960
-2
31 Aug 2026, 08:57
43,962
-15
30 Aug 2026, 10:27
43,977
+3
29 Aug 2026, 08:46
43,974
-13
28 Aug 2026, 06:54
43,987
-26
27 Aug 2026, 04:04
44,013
-14
26 Aug 2026, 00:36
44,027
-3
25 Aug 2026, 01:14
44,030
-11
23 Aug 2026, 13:07
44,041
+6
21 Aug 2026, 23:55
44,035
+4
20 Aug 2026, 17:13
44,031
-19
19 Aug 2026, 16:26
44,050
first reading
Engagement
182 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.6%
avg views ÷ 43,759 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,370
97 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
100
of 182 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
182 (30 July 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
617,810
Reactions total
12,388
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 11:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈566
Videos
≈1,360
Links
≈2,930
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 03m
Average length
58s
Measured directly from 66 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
24,655 reactions across 178 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
8,965
36.4%
❤
8,197
33.2%
🙏
2,320
9.41%
👏
1,711
6.94%
🔥
1,625
6.59%
💯
948
3.85%
😁
798
3.24%
🎉
64
0.26%
🥰
14
0.057%
🤩
7
0.028%
❤🔥
3
0.012%
😍
2
0.008%
😘
1
0.004%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 178 of the 182 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,655 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 182 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
THE WORLD IS TRANSFORMING BEFORE OUR EYES | JOSH REID JOINS THE INSIDERS CLUB
This Saturday, Josh Reid from The Redpill Project joins Charlie Ward and the team inside the Insiders Club for a live conversation on the changes unfolding around the world.
🌍 Geopolitics
💰 Global economics
🇺🇸 Trump and current developments
🏦 The changing financial system
🧠 The bigger picture behind the headlines
❓ PLUS — live questions fr…
🚨 TRUMP & XI STATE DINNER — TECH GIANTS AT THE TABLE
President Donald Trump hosted Chinese President Xi Jinping and First Lady Peng Liyuan at a White House state dinner on 24 September, with some of the biggest names in global technology and finance seated alongside them. ABC News
Among the guests were:
• Elon Musk — Tesla / SpaceX
• Jensen Huang — NVIDIA
• Lisa Su — AMD
• Tim Cook — Apple
• Sam Altman — OpenAI
• Sun…
🚨 TODAY’S DAILY NEWS — FRIDAY 25 SEPTEMBER 2026
Charlie Ward brings you today’s headlines, including:
⚠️ 5th Generation Warfare — Charlie discusses propaganda, psychological operations and how narratives are used
🌍 False flag warnings — claims circulating about possible European targets and attempts to provoke wider conflict
📜 Birth certificates & the financial system — Charlie revisits long-running claims about iden…
2034: WHEN A CONSPIRACY BECOMES THE TRUTH
What could our world look like by 2034?
Charlie Ward sits down with his longtime friend Ian Goddard, author of 2034: When a Conspiracy Becomes the Truth, for a fascinating conversation about the ideas that inspired his novel.
🔴 Digital ID
🔴 Digital money & the future of cash
🔴 15-minute cities
🔴 Surveillance & control
🔴 Banking and financial freedom
🔴 Self-sufficiency
🔴 And w…
🚨 DAILY NEWS — THURSDAY 24 SEPTEMBER 2026
🇺🇸🇨🇳 TRUMP & XI FACE-TO-FACE
President Trump welcomes Chinese President Xi Jinping to the United States as military aircraft fly overhead — with trade, tariffs, Taiwan, AI and Iran in focus.
🇬🇧 TOMMY ROBINSON DETAINED
Robinson says he was stopped at a UK airport and questioned under counter-terrorism powers.
🌍 THE OLD SYSTEM IS BEING DISMANTLED?
Charlie gives his take on the …
🙏 DAILY VERSE | ROMANS 12:13
Getting what you want may bring happiness for a moment…
❤️ But helping someone else can bring joy that lasts.
Give where you can.
Help where you can.
Be there for someone today.
📖 Romans 12:13
Be a blessing to somebody today. 🙏
🚨 Charlie will NEVER privately contact you asking for money, crypto or investments. Beware of fake accounts.
#DailyVerse #Romans1213 #BibleTok #ChristianTikTok #Bi…
🏆 JOHN BAXTER WINS TESLA AWARD!
Charlie Ward sits down with John Baxter following his Spirit of Nikola Tesla Award, as John demonstrates the technology behind his work and explains why he believes grounding and frequency are so important.
⚡️ Grounding technology
🔴 Red light & far infrared
〰️ Frequency technology
🏆 The Tesla Award
🧬 Plus John's latest health technology
John also demonstrates his grounding system and f…
Holy Shiz! Dr Oz is now notifying the IRS on those that stole from MEDICAID Fraud!!
Watch what's coming .....👀
Follow me for more!
www.charlieward.com
#medicade #medicarefraud #trump2024 #jdvance #kashpatel #scottbessent #elonmusk #fraud #gaurdianship
🔥108👏52❤15👍9😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 182 posts we hold for @officialcharliewardfriends. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
President Donald Trump has launched a poll asking whether the words “Artificial Intelligence” still accurately describe this rapidly developing technology.
His three alternatives are:
Superior, Extreme16%
Supreme Intelligence?24%
Or should it remain Artificial Intelligence?61%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 182 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
4
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@officialcharliewardfriends named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@charliebitmytictoc named in 20 posts, 11 August 2026 – 26 September 2026
@thedrcharlieward named in 19 posts, 11 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
@racheldemp444 named in 7 posts, 2 September 2026 – 10 September 2026
@officialcharliewardshow named in 3 posts, 20 September 2026 – 22 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Official Simon Parkes @simon_parkes · 113,136 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
The Mark Attwood Show: Adventures in a Cosmic Suit 2 @theMarkAttwoodShow · 21,018 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 25 September 2026
Nicholas Veniamin @NicholasVeniamin · 92,154 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 August 2026
RealRawNews @realrawnews · 28,313 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 9 September 2026
Utsava @utsavaprophecy · 24,435 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 16 September 2026
RVhighlights @RVhighlights · 27,723 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 10 September 2026
Patriot Streetfighter @patriotstreetfighter · 71,576 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
Tarot By Janine Channel @TarotByJanineChannel · 55,122 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 September 2026
John Durham @johndurhamchannel · 24,195 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 September 2026
SantaSurfing @SantaSurfing · 123,811 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
QFS - BRICS - GESARA - CRYPTO - BLOCKCHAIN - FinancialMarkets - GeoPolitics @GESARAandNESARA · 26,063 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 13 September 2026
Mr. Pool @MrPool_Q · 62,188 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 1 September 2026
American Patriot 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 @ishjay1960 · 29,756 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 8 September 2026
Jason Shurka @jasonyosefshurka · 31,153 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 6 September 2026
TRUTH Social @TRUTHSociaIQ · 40,930 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 16 September 2026
Patriot Princess 777 @patriot_princess · 39,534 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 30 August 2026
DUTCH DIGGER NEWS @maddogholland · 27,129 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 11 September 2026
Dr. Scott Young-END THE FED @DrScottNESARA · 30,082 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 7 September 2026
AMG-NEWS.COM @AMGNEWS2022 · 80,505 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 18 August 2026
Princess Diana 👒 @PrincessDiana_Q · 60,499 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 22 August 2026
Michael Jackson @M_JacksonQ · 70,551 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 20 August 2026
TRUTH PUPS @TruthPups · 21,356 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 23 September 2026
JFK TV @JFK_TV · 36,127 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 1 September 2026
DavidNinoRodriguez @ninoscorner · 79,829 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
8 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Charlie Ward & Friends” (@officialcharliewardfriends), 43,759 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/officialcharliewardfriends.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.