https://www.simonparkes.org/post/important-tuesday-8th-september-2026-update

Channel
Official Simon Parkes
@simon_parkes
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
113,136subscribers
-2,469 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001237612356 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @simon_parkes |
| Description | The OFFICIAL Telegram Channel of Simon Parkes. |
| Created | 13 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/simon_parkes |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 113,136 | -117 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 113,253 | -106 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 113,359 | -87 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 113,446 | -105 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:35 | 113,551 | -116 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:56 | 113,667 | -166 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 113,833 | -88 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:48 | 113,921 | -46 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:55 | 113,967 | -60 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 114,027 | -63 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 114,090 | -43 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:49 | 114,133 | -55 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 114,188 | -80 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:59 | 114,268 | -19 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 114,287 | -49 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 114,336 | -17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 114,353 | -77 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 114,430 | -106 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 114,536 | -129 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:42 | 114,665 | first reading |
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 12 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 26.1%
- avg views ÷ 113,136 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 29,500
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (12 February 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 88,500 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Sept 2026, 09:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈9
- Videos
- ≈5
- Links
- ≈1,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
https://www.connecting-consciousness.org/
https://www.simonparkes.org/post/sunday-23rd-august-2026-update
https://www.simonparkes.org/post/exclusive-spectra-pre-launch-offer
https://www.simonparkes.org/post/sacred-wisdom-leylines-standing-stones-monuments-part-2-q-a-with-simon-parkes
https://www.simonparkes.org/post/exclusive-spectra-pre-launch-offer-save-over-60
https://www.simonparkes.org/post/quote-from-a-cc-usa-member
https://www.simonparkes.org/post/sacred-wisdom-ley-lines-q-a-with-simon-parkes-for-monthly-spiritual-topic
https://www.simonparkes.org/post/atom-lab-the-evolution-is-here
https://www.simonparkes.org/post/exclusive-48-hours-only-atom-lab-promotion-receive-a-free-atom-lab-pendant-valued-at-169-99-with-ea
https://www.simonparkes.org/post/monday-8th-june-2026-update
https://www.simonparkes.org/post/sacred-wisdom-be-the-change-live-from-tennessee-june-2026
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @simon_parkes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@inofficialsimonparkes · 4,09619 postsPATRIOTI 17 (Ingrid)
@rytiri · 7054 postsAmerGrmaPat
@AmerGrmaPat · 11 postNewsKitchen24
@NewsKitchen24 · 2421 postKresimir Oreski
@OKresimir · 541 postCrypto Holdings platform
@cryptoholdingplatformworldwide · 211 postDavid Ashton
@davidmashton · 111 postFreedom ANZACS 🇳🇿🇦🇺
@freedomanzac · 1371 postHet Andere Nieuws
@hetanderenieuwsnu · 1,5561 postMiniQ Starship 🛸
@miniQ_starship42 · 3,1741 postI M O Y A N A
@samoaitram2Q21 · 191 postThe Messages
@the_medjugorje_messages · 31 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@RVhighlights · 27,739#1
@PatriotsRising1 · 31,499#2
@qthestormrider777 · 155,787#3
@ShadowofEzra · 147,226#4
@real_donaldjtrump · 593,162#5
@officialcharliewardfriends · 43,759#6
@GeneralMCNews · 144,492#7
@NicholasVeniamin · 92,283#8
@RealDonaldoTrumpo · 155,981#9
@disclosetv · 322,872#10
@RealGenFlynn · 149,219#11
@georgenews · 144,438#12
@ninoscorner · 79,829#13
@TrumpJr · 357,086#14
@realx22report · 160,968#15
@realrawnews · 28,379#16
@Whiplash347 · 124,162#17
@SantaSurfing · 124,189#18
@JulianAssangeWiki · 162,545#19
@PepeMatter · 146,993#20
@looP_rM_3117211 · 236#21
@QuantumStellarInitiative · 32,102#22
@ResisttheMainstream · 130,027#23
@Ezra_Cohen_Q17 · 68,121#24
@insiderpaper · 108,477#25
@AMGNEWS2022 · 80,505#26
@MasterCMiller · 27,399#27
@CodeMonkeyZ · 126,157#28
@SpaceForceGalacticFederation · 57,402#29
@qazempire23 · 3,478#30
@KanekoaTheGreat · 117,219#31
@utsavaprophecy · 24,488#32
@bioclandestine · 139,192#33
@M_JacksonQ · 70,797#34
@SidneyPowell · 127,205#35
@QNewsOfficialTV · 82,487#36
@docsalla · 14,482#37
@ishjay1960 · 29,756#38
@WeTheMedia · 143,429#39
@PrincessDiana_Q · 60,615#40
@TheStormHasArrived17 · 92,725#41
@candlesinthenight · 93,867#42
@thewhitehatshome · 8,307#43
@freedomforcebattalion · 77,307#44
@DonaldTrumpOffice · 56,834#45
@JFK_Q17 · 105,121#46
@DrScottNESARA · 30,140#47
@MedBedsTechnologyNews · 78,700#48
@BREAKINGHEADLINES · 67,943#49
@TartariaHistoryChannel · 120,122#50
@iceg0v · 15,543#51
@TruthPups · 21,402#52
@realRTMnews · 36,243#53
@Jack_Posobiec · 117,451#54
@Richardcitizenjournalists · 110,046#55
@DanScavinoFORCE · 90,379#56
@TerraGenesisInnovations · 1,425#57
@blackrockholdings · 2,359#58
@patriotstreetfighter · 71,852#59
@QTSR2 · 18,166#60
@ElenaDanaanOfficialChannel · 16,857#61
@rmn_judybyington · 17,859#62
@GeneralPatton17 · 39,210#63
@TrumpChannel · 134,619#64
@rsbnetwork · 103,474#65
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@officialcharliewardfriends · 43,759
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 28 August 2026
@NicholasVeniamin · 92,283
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 August 2026
@News_3Dto5D · 39,519
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 31 August 2026
@realrawnews · 28,379
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 9 September 2026
@PatrickKennedy777 · 48,460
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 26 August 2026
@jasonyosefshurka · 31,153
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 6 September 2026
@MedicalMedium · 54,023
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
@KBlive · 124,828
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 August 2026
@patriotstreetfighter · 71,852
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
@CodeMonkeyZ · 126,157
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
@TheAmericanSovereign · 30,938
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 6 September 2026
@ReinerFuellmichEnglish · 84,909
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
@ninoscorner · 79,829
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026
@SidneyPowell · 127,205
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
@TrumpJr · 357,086
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
@Richardcitizenjournalists · 110,046
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026
@RealGenFlynn · 149,219
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
@realRTMnews · 36,243
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026
@drchristianenorthrup · 41,964
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Official Simon Parkes” (@simon_parkes), 113,136 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/simon_parkes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.