Channel
@docsalla
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,620subscribers
-105 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001258524115 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @docsalla |
| Created | 14 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/docsalla |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 14,620 | -13 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 14,633 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 14,641 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 14,647 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 14,648 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 14,652 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 14,656 | -16 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 14,672 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 14,673 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 14,683 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 14,690 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 14,699 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 14,707 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 14,709 | -11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:40 | 14,720 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 14,725 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 14,725 | first reading |
43 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 43 (19 July 2026 – 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 132,839 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Why wait for official disclosure of extraterrestrial life before investigating its consequences at the personal, national, and global levels? The five UFO document drops by the US Dept of War, the public emergence of credible mil-intel whistleblowers, statements by members of the US Congress on Non-Human Intelligence, and unprecedented legacy media coverage all point to significant official disclosures are on the way…
Evidence grows that Moon and Antarctica were attacked by German Dark Fleet: Exopolitics Today Week in Review https://exopolitics.org/evidence-grows-that-moon-and-antarctica-were-attacked-by-german-dark-fleet/
In the Space.com story linked below, Brett Tngley speculates about "Russian 'space activity'" being the cause of a USAF C-17 Globemaster aircraft turning back from a trip to McMurdo base in Antarctica on Aug 18. The Russian space activity reportedly began on Aug 14, according to a Notice to AirMen (NOTAM) issued by the FAA. This NOTAM is a cover story for the US Space Force/Space Command taking preventive measures t…
I've often interviewed Jean Charles Moyen on my Exopolitics Today channel about his extraordinary psychic abilities such as teleportation, remote healing, and influencing electronics around him. His teleportation ability is unique and has enabled him to visit nearly a dozen ancient space arks hidden underground around the world. Jean Charles sent me this video showing how he was able to psychically turn off a dista…
Free Energy, ET Technology & the Science they tried To Suppress | Dr. David Clements https://exopolitics.org/free-energy-et-technology-the-science-they-tried-to-suppress-dr-david-clements/
In his latest video update, JP (US Army, ret.) describes his missions to the Moon and Ganymede in Nov 2021, when he was stationed at Eglin AFB with the Army's 7th Special Forces Group. He describes aspects of the moon missions and how, after the missions, all the soldiers have to walk through a room with special equipment designed to erase their memories of the missions. In some cases, due to musical abilities, etc…
Could this giant USO (aka tic tac factory/mothership) off the coast of the Bahamas that's been tracked by the US Navy/Mitre Corp, since at least 1959, have anything to do with the giant space ark that JP has been describing since 2018 in the same area? While JP has described the space ark releasing orbs to monitor surface humanity, the "tic tac factory" has been observed to be releasing "transmedium spacecraft". I…
Area 51 Attacked, Then the Moon? Contactee Reveals Shocking 3-Day Timeline https://exopolitics.org/area-51-attacked-then-the-moon-contactee-reveals-shocking-3-day-timeline/
What's the connection between the secret spaceport under Green Mountain, Alabama, and the Dark Fleet attack on the Moon that took place on July 28? Today, we received a report from the engineering team of the company that hosts our webinars, Crowdcast, about the technical glitch that caused our Green Mountain Mystery webinar to fail to transmit last week. Crowdcast support wrote: "I’m pleased to let you know that …
Here's the first official report of a SpaceX rocket crashing into the Moon that appeared on July 30, 2026. It drew attention to an upcoming lunar impact on Aug 5 that was allegedly photographed by South Korean and Chinese lunar orbiters. Fact: The SpaceX Moon crash story appeared only two days after Dr. Katharine Milano reported a Dark Fleet attack on the Moon-based Space Force fleet at Lunar Operations Command (LOC…
Here's my latest interview on John Michael Chambers channel. Excellent panel discussion with him and Lt Col Tom Lennox on: "The Galactic Federation, Time Travel, and the Last President - Through the Portal" https://youtu.be/LVCL_2l-Fg8?si=wxOuqFhOna-vyxsw
Dark Fleet Attacks the Moon: Space Force Fleet Devastated in Surprise Assault (Space Force Update 1) https://exopolitics.org/dark-fleet-attacks-the-moon-space-force-fleet-devastated-in-surprise-assault-space-force-update-1/
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @docsalla. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 168,422 of 1,585,237entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Michael Salla” (@docsalla), 14,620 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/docsalla.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.