Ya know, if I were to go back in time to Oct. 2019 and tell myself what we'd all go through for the next 7 years in this chitshow, she'd think I was batchit crazy. She really would. How about you?

Channel
Nancy Drew
@KBlive
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
122,522subscribers
-5,420 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001193413031 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KBlive |
| Description | DC adventures |
| Created | 18 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 47 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KBlive |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:45 | 122,522 | -54 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:39 | 122,576 | -83 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:39 | 122,659 | -42 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 122,701 | -78 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 122,779 | -56 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:26 | 122,835 | -32 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 122,867 | -95 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 23:27 | 122,962 | -40 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 23:36 | 123,002 | -74 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 14:37 | 123,076 | -239 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 16:37 | 123,315 | -226 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 123,541 | -454 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 123,995 | -833 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:38 | 124,828 | -138 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:55 | 124,966 | -124 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 125,090 | -130 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 125,220 | -189 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 125,409 | -201 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 125,610 | -251 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 125,861 | first reading |
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 160 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.5%
- avg views ÷ 122,522 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 19,000
- 45 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 45
- of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 65 (2 July 2026 – 24 October 2026) |
| Views total | 855,590 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Oct 2026, 01:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,210
- Videos
- ≈1,950
- Links
- ≈423
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2h 54m
- Average length
- 11m 39s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
At least not to my knowledge....😬😂
For the past week Jalin has had an appt everyday with a specialist in different areas. Its been incredibly stressful and at times I felt so defeated and emotional. On the verge of tears several times. If it wasnt for all the people that we were in the presence of I probably wouldve broken down. Every single doctor, nurse, assistant and even the other patients were just as kind and loving as they could be. They saved…
Photo, posted without a caption
FB live💖 10/18/2026 11 am
Here we go Maryland. The shenanigans begin. Leaving out important information. Vote in person if at all possible. https://www.wbaltv.com/article/anne-arundel-county-sample-ballot-missing-pages/74159479?utm_campaign=snd-autopilot&fbclid=IwdGRzaAU_hhVjbGNrBT-DCmV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHBkb2YBc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQMMzUwNjg1NTMxNzI4AAEeFK0r7qXC8gP_5whYgLI8Wg32gpxTlMeAVTa-7shEsi9RA2sBRi4PEBwer7k_aem_oyMRUIbNtIi0cHA_LiaSnA
Please dont let anyone discourage you from voting. Get out there and vote!❤
This is not medical advice but if you have psoriasis excema or a sore babies bottom try the tallow butter on it. Its been helping people ❤❤ Even if you dont buy mine consider trying it. I'm hearing great things.
Yes! We are still filling orders, in fact we are looking forward to them! We have no plans to stop. Keeps our minds occupied, so treat yourself or someone ya luv. Nourish that skin and hair! Beards too.❤❤ *All prices include shipping* Mail payments to- PO Box 561 Severna Park, MD. 21146 Or send it through Zelle at- [email protected] Tallow Butter- $22 grass fed Quiet Place- Frankensence, Lavender and Chamomi…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Carol Fye, could you please email me? ❤ [email protected]
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @KBlive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@DevolutioninAction · 224 postsTRUMPWQRLD
@Trumpworld · 2,5212 postsSanta Surfing
@trumpsbestgirl · 2,3312 postsAngelResQue USA🇺🇸
@AngelResQue · 1,4651 postAngelResQue UK 🇬🇧
@AngelResQueUK · 8871 postForHumanity 🌹⚜️
@BeAudatiouslyBoldTrustGod · 31 postPRETTY WEIRD
@PRETTYWEIRD369 · 61 postTRUMP PATRIOTS
@Patriots4Trump2 · 141 post..🚨🚔𝐐𝟗𝟏𝟏🚔🚨..
@REALQ911 · 2,0901 postAwakened Woman
@iamawakened_woman · 231 postAmerican Patriot 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@ishjay1960 · 29,4041 postStarseedQ
@lightwinsoverdark · 131 postRed Step Stacker
@official_redstepstacker · 3511 postTexas Ted Talks
@texastedtalks · 2361 postYoda & Romeo
@yodaandromeo · 371 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@PatriotsRising1 · 31,073#1
@qthestormrider777 · 153,630#2
@real_donaldjtrump · 583,445#3
@candlesinthenight · 92,688#4
@bioclandestine · 138,063#5
@Ezra_Cohen_Q17 · 67,925#6
@freedomforcebattalion · 76,508#7
@WHGrampaChannel · 45,450#8
@ninoscorner · 78,819#9
@ResisttheMainstream · 127,368#10
@RealGenFlynn · 146,419#11
@gatewaypunditofficial · 109,476#12
@DrScottNESARA · 29,855#13
@TheStormHasArrived17 · 90,570#14
@ishjay1960 · 29,404#15
@CodeMonkeyZ · 123,706#16
@WHGrampaOfficial47 · 6,133#17
@KanekoaTheGreat · 115,145#18
@americanpatriotus · 14,871#19
@SGTnewsNetwork · 110,232#20
@lightnerpatriot17 · 35,597#21
@BREAKINGHEADLINES · 66,109#22
@Bearded_PatriotsUSA · 12,254#23
@TruthPups · 21,122#24
@JFK_Q17 · 103,777#25
@RealDonaldoTrumpo · 154,567#26
@GeneralMCNews · 143,081#27
@georgenews · 141,910#28
@ShadowofEzra · 145,408#29
@PepeMatter · 143,821#30
@DanScavinoFORCE · 88,743#31
@SantaSurfing · 122,269#32
@Richardcitizenjournalists · 107,602#33
@DirtRoadDiscussion · 131,963#34
@realx22report · 158,449#35
@insiderpaper · 108,059#36
@RVhighlights · 27,596#37
@WeTheMedia · 140,863#38
@JulianAssangeWiki · 162,293#39
@X777EAGLE · 8,241#40
@Jack_Posobiec · 115,066#41
@disclosetv · 318,817#42
@TrumpJr · 349,495#43
@DeepDives · 32,139#44
@police_frequency · 69,408#45
@MasterCMiller · 26,667#46
@newstreasonupdates · 35,063#47
@AMGNEWS2022 · 79,755#48
@toresaysPlus · 44,258#49
@simon_parkes · 111,130#50
@liltalkshow · 48,607#51
@DUMBSandUnderground · 101,782#52
@NicholasVeniamin · 91,669#53
@rmn_judybyington · 17,487#54
@thewhitehatshome · 8,198#55
@Whiplash347 · 122,021#56
@realrawnews · 28,018#57
@rsbnetwork · 101,254#58
@QuantumStellarInitiative · 31,070#59
@JULIEGREENMINISTRIES · 52,969#60
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@FCBPODCAST · 22,962
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 20 September 2026
@CodeMonkeyZ · 123,706
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
@DirtRoadDiscussion · 131,963
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 13 August 2026
@TheDonaldUS · 21,923
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 September 2026
@CatturdFanClub · 22,205
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 September 2026
@RealGenFlynn · 146,419
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
@SantaSurfing · 122,269
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
@real_donaldjtrump · 583,445
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@TruthPups · 21,122
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 23 September 2026
@KanekoaTheGreat · 115,145
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
@General_PattonQ · 19,913
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 28 September 2026
@TarotByJanineChannel · 54,368
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 September 2026
@ResisttheMainstream · 127,368
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
@qthestormrider777 · 153,630
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
@bioclandestine · 138,063
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
@theMarkAttwoodShow · 20,915
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 25 September 2026
@RealDonaldoTrumpo · 154,567
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
@georgenews · 141,910
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
@PepeMatter · 143,821
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
@realx22report · 158,449
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
@SidneyPowell · 124,153
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
@TrumpJr · 349,495
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
@Q_Anon8 · 21,260
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 September 2026
@ShadowofEzra · 145,408
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nancy Drew” (@KBlive), 122,522 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KBlive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.