This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
28 measurements spanning 34 days, net -104. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,689–19,825 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 23:17
19,705
-16
5 Sept 2026, 12:41
19,721
+1
3 Sept 2026, 17:41
19,720
+2
2 Sept 2026, 11:12
19,718
-4
1 Sept 2026, 11:47
19,722
-3
31 Aug 2026, 15:07
19,725
-10
29 Aug 2026, 11:03
19,735
-5
28 Aug 2026, 07:37
19,740
-1
27 Aug 2026, 05:03
19,741
+7
26 Aug 2026, 02:22
19,734
-4
25 Aug 2026, 00:54
19,738
-11
23 Aug 2026, 12:59
19,749
-4
20 Aug 2026, 19:17
19,753
-8
19 Aug 2026, 18:32
19,761
-1
18 Aug 2026, 15:34
19,762
-6
17 Aug 2026, 16:24
19,768
-5
16 Aug 2026, 13:59
19,773
-1
15 Aug 2026, 00:14
19,774
-4
13 Aug 2026, 16:08
19,778
-5
12 Aug 2026, 18:33
19,783
first reading
Engagement
119 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.99%
avg views ÷ 19,705 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,380
82 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
82
of 119 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
119 (30 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
112,976
Reactions total
2,616
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 01:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 22m
Average length
1m 15s
Measured directly from 66 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,023 reactions across 119 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,097
52.1%
👍
753
18.7%
🔥
360
8.95%
💯
238
5.92%
🙏
115
2.86%
🤬
91
2.26%
🤮
68
1.69%
⚡
49
1.22%
👏
40
0.994%
🤯
36
0.895%
😢
35
0.87%
🤣
29
0.721%
❤🔥
28
0.696%
😁
18
0.447%
🤔
17
0.423%
👀
14
0.348%
👎
14
0.348%
🏆
5
0.124%
😱
4
0.099%
🤩
4
0.099%
5 further kinds
8
0.199%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 119 of the 119 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,023 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 119 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
For the last 30+ years, I have had thousands of people come to me with these issues:
Weight gain. Fertility struggles. Hormone imbalances. Parasites. Blood sugar issues. Fatigue. Skin problems. Digestive complaints.
Almost every time, I ask the same question:
“How’s your liver?”
Most people, even doctors, have never even thought about it.
Yet your liver is doing 500+ of vital jobs for you every single day, inclu…
SELENIUM WAS FOUND TO
PREVENT & CURE CANCER.
“selenium has a selective action against cancer cells but didn’t hurt healthy tissues”
SELENIUM FUNCTIONS
👉🏻Component of glutathione peroxidase
👉🏻Detoxification of peroxidases & free radicals
👉🏻Reduces oxidized Vitamin E
👉🏻Prevents oxidations of skeletal & heart muscle fibers
👉🏻Vitamin C metabolism & thyroid function - fertility
👉🏻Acts as a powerful antioxidant
…
Lymphedema Complete Protocol – Part 2
🥤 Nutrient-Rich Green Juice
Green Juice Recipe
1 bunch celery
1 bunch flat-leaf parsley
2 tablespoons freeze-dried wheatgrass powder
3 teaspoons spirulina powder
2 cucumbers
Directions
Blend or juice all ingredients until smooth.
Strain through a nut milk bag if desired.
Store in the refrigerator.
Use within 1 week.
Drink 2 cups daily.
🛁 Epsom Salt Bath
Add ½ pound (about 225 g…
Dr. Eric Nepute says he treated more than 11,000 patients during COVID without losing a single one.
Then, the federal government came after him with potential penalties totaling $508 BILLION. ⚠️
For “violating the COVID-19 Consumer Protection Act”.
And this is the part that should concern every American:
They attempted to count individual views, emails and replays of his content as separate violations.
More than…
Holy shit….
Trump just dropped a red-pill nuclear bomb on Truth Social.
He posted a video showing NIH Geneticist and Biochemist outlining that vaccines have toxic chemicals like Mercury in them, and can cause autism.
Trump just called vaccines “poison”…
MUST WATCH!
Follow: Quantum Medicine ✅️
👂 Blocked ears, buzzing or woozy head? Here’s my go-to 60-second routine that uses points that (in TCM) help with lots of ear issues!
👉🏻 Warm-up
Thumb-stroke up the front of the ear and down behind it a few times to get the circulation moving.
👉🏻 Three points on the tragus – press each for 60 sec
• GB 2 – dip just below the tragus tip
• SI 19 – dip level with the pointy bit
• TB 21 – dip just above the tip
👉🏻 Fini…
For more than 30 years, I’ve watched couples do almost ANYTHING to get pregnant. 🤰
And the first question I ask is:
“How’s your liver?”
Because I don’t believe in simply chasing symptoms.
Symptoms are messages.
Your liver performs over 500 vital functions and is the most important organ for your hormones.
Yet very few couples struggling with fertility have ever been asked:
“Have you ever cleansed your liver?”
…
❤34👏8🙏5💯2🔥1🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 119 posts we hold for @drgroupofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@drgroupofficial named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@banned_truth named in 4 posts, 24 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
@dredwardgroup named in 2 posts, 10 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Jonathan Otto - Health Secret @jonathanottohealth · 29,497 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
Dr. Bryan Ardis @BryanArdis · 36,737 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
Medical Medium @MedicalMedium · 54,298 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
Christiane Northrup M.D @drchristianenorthrup · 42,197 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
Dr. Mercola @DoctorMercola · 31,652 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 5 September 2026
The TRUTH About Cancer | Vaccines @TheTruthAboutCancer_Vaccines · 29,103 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
Health Ranger @RealHealthRanger · 63,704 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr. Edward Group, DC” (@drgroupofficial), 19,705 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drgroupofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.