Channel
@sayerji
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,319subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001531466557 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sayerji |
| Created | 25 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sayerji |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 3,319 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 3,315 | +23 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 3,292 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 3,296 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 3,302 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 3,305 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 3,309 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 3,311 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 3,311 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
150 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 82 | 54.7% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 14.7% | |
| 💯 | 17 | 11.3% | |
| 🙏 | 15 | 10.0% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 2.67% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 2.00% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.33% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.33% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 0.667% | |
| 😴 | 1 | 0.667% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.667% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
You Bought It Faster Than We Could Ferment It CardioNK™ is back in stock. First come, first served — and this time, the whole story. https://sayerji.substack.com/p/you-bought-it-faster-than-we-could
🌸 Beyond the Opposition — What 40 Years of Traditional Astrology Couldn’t See For centuries, astrology evaluated birth charts in isolated two-body fragments—drawing 45 separate pairwise lines on a 2D wheel and guessing which aspect "wins." The Scalar Flower Model replaces this fragmented wheel with a single continuous 3D wave equation: treating all 10 planets as wave sources playing a total, unified chord. In our …
When major media outlets turn their attention to astrology, the result is almost universally the same: a blend of pop-psychology, unfalsifiable tropes, and political inkblot tests disguised as ancient wisdom. https://sayerji.substack.com/p/the-huffpost-astrologers-and-the
👍2🤮1
💚For most of the past two decades, my work has lived inside studies, databases, and long hours of reading. I would find a paper, follow its references, examine the mechanism, compare it with what came before, and try to understand what it meant for the human body. Then I would write. That is how GreenMedInfo began, and it is how I have served this community for nearly twenty years, with over a billion views on our a…
👏3❤2
Join my Substack here: https://substack.com/@sayerji
❤1
Following today’s Anthony Fauci hearing, Sayer Ji, Chairman and Co-Founder of GWF joined the MAHA Media Hub with a powerful reminder: while millions of Americans are still seeking answers and accountability, we’ve already crossed an important threshold. Despite years of censorship, ridicule, and relentless efforts to silence honest questions about COVID-era policies, the truth continued to spread. And now, the veil…
❤9💯7🙏5❤🔥1
💚After twenty years of writing about the research, I finally have something incredbily inspiring to show you. 🎉https://open.substack.com/pub/sayerji/p/what-if-a-multivitamin-could-be-grown
❤9
☀️More than a multi—it’s a complete reimagining of what daily nutrition can be. 🍄Introducing the new Regenerate Men’s + Women’s Multivitamins, made with 40+ food-based nutrients, fermented vitamins, functional mushrooms, BIOSTEM Cell Blend™, and peptide-powered minerals. Real food. Regenerative sourcing. Ancient intelligence. Now available! 🌱Explore the Men’s Multi: https://regeneratecompany.com/products/mens-mult…
A strangely timed hit piece accusing me of forgetting the HPV literature never mentions the fourteen deaths in the vaccine's own randomized trial. Here is the rest of the ledger, sourced to the manufacturer's data, the WHO's database, and the National Cancer Institute's own words. Substack: https://open.substack.com/pub/sayerji/p/whose-amnesia-what-science-based?r=x6go&utm_medium=ios On X: https://x.com/sayerjigmi/…
👍3
The blue isn't dye — it's phycocyanin. 💙 🔹It's the pigment protein that gives blue spirulina its deep color, and in nature it does real work: capturing light and donating electrons during photosynthesis. That same redox chemistry is why phycocyanin is so well-studied as an antioxidant, including for its role in the NRF2 pathway — the body's own antioxidant response system. 🔹We built MethylateBLUE around 500mg of or…
❤3👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤11👍5👏1😴1
Photo, posted without a caption
💯10👍5🤔1😈1
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @sayerji. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sayer Ji Official Channel” (@sayerji), 3,319 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sayerji.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.