Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Nicholas J. Fuentes

Channel

Nicholas J. Fuentes

@nickjfuentes

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

112,415subscribers

-10,885 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001343341889
TypeChannel
Username@nickjfuentes
DescriptionOfficial telegram channel for Nick Fuentes. America First: Monday-Friday at 9pm cst Cozy.tv/Nick Contact Me: [email protected]
Created19 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/nickjfuentes

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

112,233123,300117,766.5112,4156 August 20267 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 93 days, net -10,885. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 110,573–124,960 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 10:56112,415-3
6 Nov 2026, 12:15112,418+16
5 Nov 2026, 09:09112,402+109
4 Nov 2026, 08:08112,293+60
3 Nov 2026, 04:19112,233-42
2 Nov 2026, 07:36112,275-64
1 Nov 2026, 04:26112,339-94
31 Oct 2026, 06:46112,433-116
30 Oct 2026, 03:50112,549-111
29 Oct 2026, 05:19112,660-101
28 Oct 2026, 01:38112,761-39
27 Oct 2026, 03:06112,800-41
26 Oct 2026, 06:09112,841-73
25 Oct 2026, 05:11112,914-50
24 Oct 2026, 03:47112,964-89
23 Oct 2026, 00:56113,053-64
21 Oct 2026, 22:15113,117+78
20 Oct 2026, 19:10113,039-51
19 Oct 2026, 17:11113,090-74
18 Oct 2026, 19:56113,164first reading

Engagement

189 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 189 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.1%
avg views ÷ 112,415 subscribers
Avg views / post
32,700
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 189 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held189 (31 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total1,307,890
Reactions total77,197
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 16:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,580
Videos
≈836
Links
≈3,930

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 05s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

498,907 reactions across 183 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤218,67043.8%
👎87,08117.5%
😁86,59917.4%
🔥66,72013.4%
👍39,8377.98%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 189 of the 189 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 519,279 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 189 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 40 posts held from the last 30 days (2.50%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 10:00 UTC≈9,270 views825 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤588🔥177👍30👎18😁12

7 Nov 2026, 09:58 UTC≈9,720 views975 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤694🔥208👍36👎20😁17

7 Nov 2026, 03:33 UTC≈13,800 views2,083 reactionsread 7 November 2026

No show tonight back on Monday

👎1,300❤512😁125👍109🔥37

6 Nov 2026, 06:01 UTC≈18,400 views947 reactionsread 7 November 2026

America First is LIVE! Tonight we are discussing the Rubio vs Vance infighting and Trump’s Truth Social post blaming voters for the stock market crash Rumble.com/nickjfuentes

❤735🔥109👍44😁36👎23

5 Nov 2026, 19:05 UTC≈21,600 views1,973 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Wow Charles Yockey was fired? Too bad.

😁1,660❤183🔥89👎22👍19

5 Nov 2026, 05:20 UTC≈24,800 views1,136 reactionsread 7 November 2026

America First is LIVE! Tonight we are discussing the extinction-level defeat of MAGA in the midterms, VP Vance’s response, and the future of the Republican Party. Rumble.com/nickjfuentes

🔥868❤164👍49😁28👎27

4 Nov 2026, 20:43 UTC≈29,000 views4,145 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

The Groyper Effect.

🔥3,260❤518😁208👎92👍67

4 Nov 2026, 19:40 UTC≈27,100 views3,498 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

The world in our hands…

🔥2,630❤506😁249👎76👍37

4 Nov 2026, 06:48 UTC≈42,300 views4,444 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Thank you to everybody who tuned into my coverage of the 2026 midterm elections tonight! We peaked at 87k live viewers, new record— second biggest stream of all time I think. Third biggest in the US behind NBC and Hasan.

❤3,550🔥559😁142👍141👎52

4 Nov 2026, 01:36 UTC≈35,100 views1,424 reactionsread 7 November 2026

America First is LIVE! Tonight we are COVERING THE IMMINENT BLUE TSUNAMI 😈🌊⛈️😂 Rumble.com/nickjfuentes

❤1,050🔥206😁93👎54👍21

4 Nov 2026, 00:13 UTC≈30,300 views3,628 reactionsread 7 November 2026

We did it again.

❤2,640🔥533😁309👎106👍40

3 Nov 2026, 19:33 UTC≈27,700 views1,959 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @AmericaFirstHQPhoto

Nick Fuentes will be live TONIGHT at 7PM CT to cover the midterm elections! 🔥 Watch live on Rumble AND AF+! rumble.com/nickjfuentes americafirst.plus/live

🔥1,580❤232👍73👎37😁37

Showing the 12 most recent of 189 posts we hold for @nickjfuentes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republished by 70 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.

The Evangelist
@thevangelist666 · 2
9 posts
Texas Zoomer’s Rodeo Barn 🇨🇱
@TexZoomer · 167
7 posts
wendelegram
@Wendelegram · 2,946
7 posts
Nicholas J. Fuentes
@nickfuentes · 64
6 posts
ZIG-Zoomer Intelligence Group
@GenZesus24 · 203
5 posts
The Greyson
@GovGreyson · 281
5 posts
Amerikaner’s Stuff 2.0
@amerikanerstuff2 · 211
5 posts
PurpleNewsNetwork
@PurpleNewsNetwork · 6
4 posts
ROADRAGEyankee
@THETOOTHLESSyankee · 1
4 posts
/CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global
@CIG_telegram · 114,531
3 posts
The Fairfield Republicans
@FairfieldRepublicans · 16
3 posts
Pelly’s Nest
@PellysNest · 384
3 posts
Preparedness & Politics 🌲
@pgprepper · 193
3 posts
Aether💊Pills
@AetherPills · 324
2 posts
Punished Clossington
@Chossingston · 4,378
2 posts
Chris “England First” Mitchell
@ChrisEnglandFirst · 55
2 posts
CozyPlays
@CozyPlays · 186
2 posts
DC Perspective
@DCPerspective · 33
2 posts
Grant The Catholic ✝️🇻🇦⚡️
@Granthecatholic · 599
2 posts
Harley-Davidson Groyper
@HarleyDavidsonGroyper · 145
2 posts
Sunflower Society ヒマワリ会
@Himawarikai · 3,896
2 posts
LauraLoomerFanClub
@LauraLoomerFanClub · 68
2 posts
Michelle Malkin
@MichelleMalkin · 11,177
2 posts
Ali Jamal channel aka Wow-fi
@Wowfiedit · 133
2 posts
Based_Biracial 🇺🇸☝🏽
@based_biracial1 · 71
2 posts
House of Wagner
@houseofwagner · 1,138
2 posts
JFGariepy
@jfgariepy · 1,221
2 posts
Sonder Signals
@sondercalls · 9,878
2 posts
Spinachbrah
@spinachbrah · 457
2 posts
Assistant Groyper
@AssistantGroyper · 171
1 post
Black Hammer Party
@BHParty · 92
1 post
Cassandra Fairbanks
@CassandraFairbanks · 2,939
1 post
نیکلاس جی. فوئنتس
@FuentesFA · 21
1 post
GWKChan
@GWKChan · 379
1 post
𝙃𝙒'𝙨 🥯 𝘽𝙪𝙣𝙨
@HWsBuns · 1,015
1 post
[ 𝙅𝙑𝙀-𝙄𝙑 ]
@JVE_IV · 186
1 post
John Lawson | TheNationalObserver.co
@JohnLawson_TNO · 502
1 post
Карельский бальзам | Новости
@KB_Announcments · 47,375
1 post
Alpha, Omega, and Sigma
@alphaomegasigma · 222
1 post
Autochtoon Nederland
@autochtoonNL · 180
1 post
Беньямин Нетаньяху😎🇮🇱
@benjamin271k · 5
1 post
Chief Trumpster
@chieftrumpster · 2,090
1 post
Coulter Culture
@coulterculture · 65
1 post
+ FLAK +
@flakdieband · 2,109
1 post
Memetics Distribution Channel
@iberianfertilizer · 65
1 post
Keith Woods
@keith_woods · 27,827
1 post
temp
@kingdom_of_no_conscience · 1
1 post
𝕷𝖆 𝕷𝖆𝖌𝖚𝖓𝖆 𝕹𝖊𝖌𝖗𝖆 🏴‍☠️
@lalagunanegra · 956
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

NJF Archive
@NJFArchive · 9,647
#1
Paul's Town
@paultownreal · 3,099
#2
Vincent James
@RealVincentJames · 27,745
#3
☧ speckzo 🇻🇦
@speckzo · 3,585
#4
E. Michael Jones
@RealEMichaelJones · 8,197
#5
Pax Tube
@PaxTube · 5,895
#6
𝔸𝔽 𝕍𝔸𝕌𝕃𝕋 🇺🇸
@afvault · 2,425
#7
Cozy Corner
@CozyTVCorner · 3,348
#8
Nativist Concern
@nativistconcern · 5,354
#9
DD Geopolitics
@DDGeopolitics · 189,984
#10
The Western Chauvinist (Main)
@TheWesternChauvinist11 · 10,111
#11
Keith Woods
@keith_woods · 27,827
#12
Disclose.tv
@disclosetv · 317,088
#13
Rerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸
@rnintel · 161,013
#14
/CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global
@CIG_telegram · 114,531
#15
Bellum Acta - Intel, Urgent News and Archives ✝️ #FreeVenezuela
@BellumActaNews · 107,872
#16
Middle East Spectator — MES
@middle_east_spectator · 397,207
#17
Pinesap ✝️🌲🍯
@thenarrowway · 4,939
#18
Emerson Artwork
@emerson_artwork · 3,198
#19
Joel Davis
@joeldavis_x · 10,241
#20
Intel Slava
@intelslava · 385,815
#21
Thuletide
@thuletide · 22,788
#22
Paul Joseph Watson
@pjwnews · 37,227
#23
Classical Theist
@classicaltheist · 4,737
#24
TYLER RUSSELL
@TylerLRussell · 2,613
#25
Fisk Financial
@fiskfinancial · 1,364
#26
Global Intel Watch
@waffairsblog · 10,393
#27
Chief Trumpster
@chieftrumpster · 2,090
#28
Lauren Witzke ✝️🇺🇸
@LaurenWitzkeOfficial · 14,937
#29
America First HQ
@AmericaFirstHQ · 13,207
#30
Mark Collett
@markacollett · 20,364
#31
Eurochud
@eurochud · 8,370
#32
Zoomer Historian
@ZoomerHistorian · 10,408
#33
Imperium Press
@ImperiumPressOfficial · 8,847
#34
Mediterranean Man
@medmannews · 76,710
#35
War Monitor
@warmonitors · 150,962
#36
Paleocon Steve
@timposts · 236
#37
Working Men Memes
@WorkingMenMemes · 21,897
#38
Laura Towler
@lauratowler · 9,169
#39
Blair Cottrell 🇦🇺
@realblaircottrell · 19,606
#40
𝕊𝕋𝕌𝔻𝕀𝕆 𝔾ℝ𝕆𝕐ℙ𝕃𝕀 🐸📝
@groypergallery · 1,830
#41
The End Times
@demacre · 37,917
#42
Stonetoss
@stone_toss · 20,889
#43
Catholics IRL🇻🇦
@catholicsirl · 5,676
#44
ghosteroven
@ghosteroven · 1,478
#45
Catholic Arena
@Catholicarena · 6,953
#46
TikTok Groyper's Artwork
@ttgart · 947
#47
Femoids Unleashed
@FemoidsUnleashed · 14,470
#48
/g/'s Tech Memes
@gentoomemes · 28,545
#49
Internet puke
@internetpuke · 17,302
#50
Zoomers IRL
@ZoomersIRLOfficial · 9,723
#51
T.R. Sartor Official
@OSAntiquity · 575
#52

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Vincent James
@RealVincentJames · 27,745
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 9 September 2026
Keith Woods
@keith_woods · 27,827
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 9 September 2026
LAURA LOOMER
@loomeredofficial · 19,269
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 1 October 2026
Blair Cottrell 🇦🇺
@realblaircottrell · 19,606
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 30 September 2026
Thuletide
@thuletide · 22,788
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 20 September 2026
Paul Joseph Watson
@pjwnews · 37,227
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 31 August 2026
INFOWARS.COM 🚫🚫🚫
@infowarslive · 22,211
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 September 2026
Stew Peters ✝️🇺🇸
@stewpeters · 132,655
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
Mark Collett
@markacollett · 20,364
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 27 September 2026
Alex Jones
@AlexJonesChannel · 27,420
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
Disclose.tv
@disclosetv · 317,088
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
Stonetoss
@stone_toss · 20,889
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 25 September 2026
Invictus Portucale 🇵🇹
@invictus_portucale · 28,076
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 9 September 2026
/CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global
@CIG_telegram · 114,531
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
Candace Owens On Fire🔥
@CandaceOnFire · 28,749
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
Rerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸
@rnintel · 161,013
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

2022 United States Senate election in Ohio (en.wikipedia.org)
“…''America First'' and the leader of the [[Groypers]]{{cite web|url=https://t.me/nickjfuentes/6992|title=JD Vance = Endorsed|last=Fuente…”
read 1 November 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nicholas J. Fuentes” (@nickjfuentes), 112,415 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nickjfuentes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.