Channel
@thevangelist666
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001414842639 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thevangelist666 |
| Description | S h i t p o s t |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thevangelist666 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 2 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 2 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5 years ago, we had brilliant conservative female thought leaders like Michelle Malkin blowing the lid open on mass migration and pissing off CPAC donors so badly that she was never invited back. Now? Conservative female talking heads are just a bunch of shallow, disgusting skanks spewing low-IQ takes about Muslims. Disgusting.
He is basically a fat, arrogant retard who acts dumber than he really is while quietly thinking he's much smarter than he really is.
Tucker Carlson is not somebody that I even reluctantly admire, like Elon Musk or Donald Trump. He isn't self-made, has no body of work, not original, not visionary. When I think about the pantheon of heroes for my generation, it's Trump, Elon, Ye, Alex Jones, Andrew Tate. These are all absolutely original personalities, created an archetype, pushed the boundaries. Tucker in comparison is the definition of a mockingb…
GAY
I wish Sam Smith wasn’t a satanic homosexual cross dressing pedophile because a lot of his early songs are good despite the fact that he was probably thinking about guys when writing them.
NICK FUENTES & HUNTER BIDEN INTERVIEW (NO B-ROLL RAW)
EVERYBODY LOCK IN
🔥 #PurgeTheGOP #AmericaFirst 🇺🇸 https://archive.is/n8nkV https://x.com/nickjfuentes/status/2029350024706957491?s=61 #NeverVance
>Jews take over all of the media >"It's not a conspiracy stupid goy, we're just smarter!!" >Worst ratings in history >"ANTISEMITISM!!!" https://x.com/nick_field90/status/2036636104678375885?s=20
Photo, posted without a caption
Who remembers this
Peak Content
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thevangelist666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Evangelist” (@thevangelist666), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thevangelist666.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.