What are we doing here, man 😭
🤮17👨💻9😁8🥴5💅1💋1😱1

Channel
@mackenziepuff
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,015subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001508168535 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mackenziepuff |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mackenziepuff |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 1,015 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 1,016 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 1,015 | +3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 1,012 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:28 | 1,014 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 1,019 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 1,021 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 1,019 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 1,019 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
713 reactions across 19 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 244 | 34.2% | |
| 🔥 | 90 | 12.6% | |
| 😁 | 82 | 11.5% | |
| ⚡ | 46 | 6.45% | |
| 🎉 | 38 | 5.33% | |
| ❤ | 36 | 5.05% | |
| 💅 | 36 | 5.05% | |
| 😡 | 23 | 3.23% | |
| ❤🔥 | 22 | 3.09% | |
| 🤮 | 17 | 2.38% | |
| 🫡 | 15 | 2.10% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 1.82% | |
| 👨💻 | 12 | 1.68% | |
| 🤔 | 11 | 1.54% | |
| 😇 | 8 | 1.12% | |
| 💋 | 7 | 0.982% | |
| 🥴 | 5 | 0.701% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 0.281% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.281% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.281% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.281% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 713 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
What are we doing here, man 😭
🤮17👨💻9😁8🥴5💅1💋1😱1
Always nice to harvest a warm sunrise of flowers right out of your own land. I wasn’t planning on the white Rose of Sharyn’s and they’ll need to be picked much sooner for freshness, I just happened to notice them growing along the property line. Sunflowers bloom soon🌻🌼
❤🔥22😇3💋1
“Erm how can you be pro-White if you don’t support White degeneracy? You should be defending them because blacks don’t like them!” is a new one, I’ll give em credit for originality.
💅35👍6👨💻3🤔2❤1💋1
https://youtu.be/5dewJgWVkHg
🔥21
Video, posted without a caption
🤔8🫡3💋2
I need you all to understand that EVERY death threat and doxxing against me has been for having pro-White in bio specifically. I do not say slurs online. My account is incredibly tame, milquetoast even, compared to many large right-wing accounts. That’s it. That’s the sin. Every post of mine that had made these people angry has been tame. A MAGA hat, supporting ICE, asking about cosplay wigs. What infuriates them and…
💯63🫡12
Photo, posted without a caption
😡23❤2
Americans are being charged and found guilty for saying slurs at people who should have never entered this nation or been born here to begin with and I am tired.
💯51
Disorderly conduct Count 1 towards the child: not guilty Count 2 towards the videographer: guilty The Post-Floyd era, brought to you by the Civil Rights Era. Nothing has been done. Chud. Shiloh. More will come unless anything at all changes. The purpose of a system is what it does. Never forget that.
🔥37
Anyone seriously repeating the “they’re trying to divide us by race” is at best a liability and at worst a traitor. People naturally divide into races. The only issue is when White people do it. Every time I go viral I get death threats just for having pro-White in bio. Tribe up.
💯49👍6
It’s easy to get caught up on the mindset of things are happening TO you. Nothing you can do, just a little NPC being moved along. You become a victim of circumstances, why try? Social media, especially for women in my age bracket, thrives off of this mentality. Become the mover.
💯33❤4
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥26⚡10❤2💋1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @mackenziepuff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 245,891 of 1,629,535 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kenziepuff” (@mackenziepuff), 1,015 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mackenziepuff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.