Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Alex Jones

Channel

Alex Jones

@AlexJonesChannel

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

28,396subscribers

-317 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001332030398
TypeChannel
Username@AlexJonesChannel
DescriptionOfficial Telegram for real #AlexJones NEW SITE LAUNCHED! https://www.alexjoneslive.com Tune in 247: https://rumble.com/c/TheAlexJonesShowLive Shop: https://thealexjonesstore.com https://AlexJones.Live #AlexJonesShow #AlexJonesLive #AJN
Created8 May 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AlexJonesChannel

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “#AlexJones — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 6 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@AlexJonesChannel/13958 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC@AlexJonesShow/17134 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC1.003 minutes
@AlexJonesChannel/13959 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC@AlexJonesShow/17144 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC1.002 minutes
@AlexJonesChannel/13965 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC@AlexJonesShow/17205 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC1.004 minutes
@AlexJonesChannel/13966 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC@AlexJonesShow/17215 Aug 2026, 20:19 UTC1.0072 seconds
@AlexJonesChannel/13968 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 23:05 UTC@AlexJonesShow/17235 Aug 2026, 23:11 UTC1.007 minutes
@AlexJonesChannel/13970 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC@AlexJonesShow/17256 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC1.0012 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@AlexJonesShow22 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.006 minutesthis entry (220)
@AJNLIVE10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@AJNLIVE (64)
@BANNEDdotVIDEO13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (85)
@TheAmericanJournal11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (110)
@Owen_Shroyer12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (75)
@infowarslive10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (100)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 29 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 7, the earliest publisher we hold is @Owen_Shroyer. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 6 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

28,39628,71328,554.56 August 2026 — 28,713 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,697 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,683 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,654 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,640 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,614 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,588 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,577 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,558 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,540 subscribers16 August 2026 — 28,512 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,483 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,475 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,459 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,429 subscribers21 August 2026 — 28,412 subscribers23 August 2026 — 28,396 subscribers6 August 202623 August 2026
17 measurements spanning 17 days, net -317. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,348–28,761 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 08:2628,396-16
21 Aug 2026, 18:0528,412-17
20 Aug 2026, 16:5328,429-30
19 Aug 2026, 13:4528,459-16
18 Aug 2026, 12:2328,475-8
17 Aug 2026, 13:3728,483-29
16 Aug 2026, 05:2728,512-28
14 Aug 2026, 19:0528,540-18
13 Aug 2026, 12:1628,558-19
12 Aug 2026, 13:1728,577-11
11 Aug 2026, 11:0728,588-26
10 Aug 2026, 09:3328,614-26
9 Aug 2026, 09:5228,640-14
8 Aug 2026, 07:5728,654-29
7 Aug 2026, 09:5428,683-14
6 Aug 2026, 12:4128,697-16
6 Aug 2026, 02:0528,713first reading

Engagement

105 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.59%
avg views ÷ 28,396 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,300
105 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.812%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
105
of 105 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 103 of 105 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held105 (3 August 202623 August 2026)
Views total136,949
Reactions total1,099
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
560
Videos
1,020
Links
12,800

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
32s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,042 reactions across 96 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍14413.8%
🤬13813.2%
🔥11310.8%
1009.60%
🤡666.33%
🙈636.05%
💩424.03%
😈363.45%
😁353.36%
🙏353.36%
🤣302.88%
🤔242.30%
🤮232.21%
👎222.11%
💊212.02%
💯191.82%
😡171.63%
👏161.54%
👀131.25%
🎉121.15%
13 further kinds737.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 103 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,099reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTC≈1,050 views7 reactionsread 24 August 2026

#AlexJonesShow Sunday LIVE: Woman Carries Out Lindsay Clancy Copycat Killing Of Her Children In ND As Leftist Women Worldwide Celebrate Post-Birth Abortion! DC Faces End-Of-Line As World Dumps US Bonds & Ultimately The Dollar! Plus, Iran Threatens To Attack US Allies! Tune In NOW! https://www.alexjoneslive.com/2026/08/23/sunday-live-woman-carries-out-lindsay-clancy-copycat-killing-of-her-children-in-nd-as-leftist-wo

🤮5🔥2

23 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC456 viewsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @infowarslive

Judge Strikes Down Halt to Visa Processing for 75 Nations https://www.alexjoneslive.com/2026/08/22/judge-strikes-down-halt-to-visa-processing-for-75-nations/

23 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC449 views12 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @infowarslive

Newsom Signs “Stop Nick Shirley Act” into Law https://www.alexjoneslive.com/2026/08/23/newsom-signs-stop-nick-shirley-act-into-law/

🤬11💊1

23 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC449 views2 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @AJNLIVE

Trump Says He Got A Deal To Lower Beef Prices Via Imports Of Affordable Meat & Growing Domestic Herds ʀᴇᴀᴅ ᴛʜᴇ ғᴜʟʟ ʀᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ: https://alexjoneslive.com/2026/08/21/trump-says-he-got-a-deal-to-lower-beef-prices-via-imports-of-affordable-meat-growing-domestic-herds/

1👍1

23 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC473 views4 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @AJNLIVE

USPS Finalizes New Rules for Mail-in Ballots https://www.alexjoneslive.com/2026/08/23/usps-finalizes-new-rules-for-mail-in-ballots/

👍3🙈1

22 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC≈1,970 views4 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Saturday LIVE: Migrant Invasion Reaches Spain! Iran Threatens “Devastating Responses” To US Sanctions, Trump Slaps 50% Tariffs On Canada As Trade Talks Collapse, MAGA Rallies Dwindle! Plus, Top Pollster Mark Mitchell Breaks Latest On Data Centers, Midterms & MORE! https://www.alexjoneslive.com/2026/08/22/saturday-live-migrant-invasion-reaches-spain-iran-threatens-devastating-responses-to-us-sanctions-trump-slaps-50-t

2🔥1🙈1

21 Aug 2026, 23:07 UTC≈1,210 views16 reactionsread 24 August 2026

VIDEO: IT’S OFFICIAL— The Democratic Socialists of America Proclaim Their Platform Is To OVERTHROW The US Constitution https://www.alexjoneslive.com/2026/08/20/video-its-official-the-democratic-socialists-of-america-proclaim-their-platform-is-to-overthrow-the-us-constitution/

😈11👎2🔥1😡1🙈1

21 Aug 2026, 23:06 UTC≈1,110 views8 reactionsread 24 August 2026

JUST IN: Bill Gates’ Daughter Caught Plotting World Domination! Secret Class At Stanford Focused On Controlling Society & Ruling The World! https://www.alexjoneslive.com/2026/08/20/just-in-bill-gates-daughter-caught-plotting-world-domination-secret-class-at-stanford-focused-on-controlling-society-ruling-the-world/

👎3💊31🖕1

21 Aug 2026, 23:04 UTC933 views5 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Must-Watch! Infowars, Oath Keepers & Proud Boys All Victims Of SPLC Scheme Where Indicted Fraudster Was Key Witness! https://www.alexjoneslive.com/2026/08/21/must-watch-infowars-oath-keepers-proud-boys-all-victims-of-splc-scheme-where-indicted-fraudster-was-key-witness/

🙏4💯1

21 Aug 2026, 22:56 UTC907 views5 reactionsread 24 August 2026

THE WORLD HAS NEVER BEEN IN MORE DANGER! Top Experts Warn Trump Literally Thinks He’s Genghis Khan, And Netanyahu’s Plan For Reelection Is Nuclear War! https://www.alexjoneslive.com/2026/08/20/the-world-has-never-been-in-more-danger-top-experts-warn-trump-literally-thinks-hes-genghis-khan-and-netanyahus-plan-for-reelection-is-nuclear-war/

🥴2🤔1🥱1🙈1

21 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC868 views9 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @AJNLIVE

✰✰✰✰✰ #WarRoomLive: Feds Thwart Another “Terror” Plot Created By FBI, North Korea Boosts Support Of Russia In Ukraine War, Liberal Feminists Rally Behind Mother Who Strangled Her Three Children To Death — Must-Watch Broadcast! https://www.alexjoneslive.com/2026/08/21/friday-live-texas-appellate-court-overturns-alex-jones-sandy-hook-show-trial-verdict-tune-in-now-for-exclusive-details-on-the-biggest-1st-amendment-cas

👏52🔥1🙈1

21 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC≈1,850 views21 reactionsread 24 August 2026

#AlexJonesShow Friday LIVE: Texas Appellate Court Overturns Alex Jones/Sandy Hook Show Trial Verdict! Tune In Now For Exclusive Details On The Biggest 1st Amendment Case In US history! Plus, Nation Horrified After Mother Who Confessed To Murdering Her Three Children Receives Massive Support From Women! TUNE IN: https://www.alexjoneslive.com/2026/08/21/friday-live-texas-appellate-court-overturns-alex-jones-sandy-hook

🎉124🔥4🙈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @AlexJonesChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 8,576 of 1,585,381entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Project Veritas
@project_veritas · 210,109
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Health Ranger
@RealHealthRanger · 64,168
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Stew Peters ✝️🇺🇸
@stewpeters · 139,197
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
Tucker Carlson Fanbase
@TuckerFans · 108,350
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
Zeee Media 🎙
@zeeemedia · 55,187
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Dr. Tenpenny
@DrTenpenny · 90,228
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
Robert W Malone, MD
@RWMaloneMD · 106,931
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
Dr Jane Ruby
@DrJaneRuby · 59,415
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Dan Bongino
@DBongino · 108,954
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q319121 on Wikidata, read 16 August 2026
LabelAlex Jones
DescriptionAmerican far-right conspiracy theorist (born 1974)
X / Twitter@RealAlexJones

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alex Jones” (@AlexJonesChannel), 28,396 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AlexJonesChannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.