Channel
@PaxTube
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,933subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001367880651 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PaxTube |
| Created | 9 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PaxTube |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 5,933 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 5,939 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 5,941 | +5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 5,936 | -12 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 5,948 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 5,952 | +9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 5,943 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 5,937 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:20 | 5,943 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 5,945 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (6 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 17,606 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
I support good faith political discussion and the exclusion of bad faith actors. Goebbels famously said; "The Jew has no interest in solving Germany’s fateful questions. He cannot, indeed. He lives because they are unresolved." Bad faith politics is deliberately used to derail consensus and confuse a people, so an outside group (usually Jews) can prosper from the dysfunction. Online, bad faith is common since it c…
When it comes to online liberal political commentators, I see many of them as simply hustlers making bank in Western capitalist culture. Most of their opinions are just repeating system narratives or whatever's popular. Let me give some examples of what I mean. They're anti-Israel, but then turn around and support Ukraine while calling Russia evil. There's no serious good faith attempt to understand the Russian posi…
The kidnapping of Maduro in Venezuela was in direct preparation for the Iran War. ZOG's goal was to replace some of the Middle Eastern oil that would be lost from the closure of the Strait of Hormuz with Venezuelan oil. They knew it was very possible Iran would close the Strait, and they were perfectly fine with throwing the Gulf puppets and world economy under the bus for it. I'll say two things: 1. All the Western…
— 🇺🇸/🇮🇷 NEW: The Financial Times reports that tolls in the Strait of Hormuz are ‘totally legit’, and says Iran will be ‘Suezmaxxing’ They point out that other countries have also imposed transit fees within their territorial waters, such as Turkey and Denmark, making tolls in the Strait of Hormuz ‘legally defensible’ according to experts. The FT notably used an image depicting Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei as the Godf…
Progressive Democrats are successfully electing politicians who are independent of Israel and AIPAC. The fact that GOP voters can't elect a single non-AIPAC candidate, and vote out the one good Republican in Congress (Thomas Massie), is disturbing.
I'm overjoyed the "Israel comes to me in my dreams" lady lost.
🇷🇺⚡️ — A migrant with any criminal record will not be able to obtain Russian citizenship or residency rights in Russia — a law signed by Putin. @IntelSlava
American mass shooters are the most Judeo-nihilistic freaks in the world. They say "My life sucks" then drive past the politician's house, drive past the NGO headquarters, drive past the billionaire's compound, to go shoot random people in Walmart or at school. Spiritually Israeli. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/in-n-out-employee-murdered-in-mass-shooting-was-working-her-first-job/ar-AA29mjgG?ocid=BingNewsSerp
Good message. AFD is moving in the right direction.👍 https://x.com/TomaszFroelich/status/2083152026800685410?s=20
The funny thing is, Faguentes is a literal Zionist. He supports the continued existence of Israel. His only complaint against Israel is that they aren't deferential enough to the US military industrial complex, which he supports. Don't confuse that for an anti-Zionist.
Politico writes how it uses "groyper" as "a catch-all term for young, anti-establishment right-wingers". The Jewish media is deliberately trying to conflate being a White anti-Zionist with Nick Faguentes. In reality, most of us have nothing to do with that nihilistic grifting scum. https://x.com/LeadingReport/status/2083652296085250451?s=20
Trump-Netanyahu-Zelensky The Axis of Epstein.
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @PaxTube. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 67,423 of 1,629,362 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pax Tube” (@PaxTube), 5,933 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PaxTube.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.