Channel
@informationliberation
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,353subscribers
+63 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001209887535 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @informationliberation |
| Created | 4 December 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/informationliberation |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 5,353 | -3 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 5,356 | +14 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 5,342 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:14 | 5,344 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 5,343 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 5,350 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:49 | 5,347 | +10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 5,337 | +8 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 5,329 | +17 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:07 | 5,312 | +18 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 5,294 | +9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 5,285 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 5,288 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:00 | 5,290 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 5,290 | first reading |
33 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 33 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Bill O'Reilly urges Trump to commit war crimes in Iran, framing the bombing of Tehran's civilian infrastructure as a cheat code to victory. "We had enough with Japan, we had enough with Germany…we took care of that. And we're going to have to do the same thing with Iran!" (Keep in mind as you listen that Trump regularly calls O'Reilly for advice.)
"We lost the war!" John Podhoretz and the Commentary Mag crew lament that the Iran War they championed is a total disaster. "People say, 'Oh, the neocons got what they wanted!' No! None of us wanted this!" Abe Greenwald protests. Be careful what you wish for! 🤌
Brian Kilmeade says the US is never going to comply with Iran's new list of demands (withdraw from the region, pay them reparations for war damages, release frozen assets, lift all sanctions, etc.). "None of this stuff is going to happen!" he insists. Bookmark this for later, lmao.
Mark Levin kvetches up a storm over Trump wanting to make a deal with Iran. "It is apparent to me that we want a deal," Levin laments. "But the Israelis want to defeat the regime! They want to defeat the enemy, because they know that is the only way!" "We have sidelined, and through the press, have trash-talked our greatest ally—Israel," he whines. "[They're] not only [our greatest ally] in the region, but they're …
Lisa Boothe, in a rare moment of pushback, asks Amb. Mike Huckabee why America's efforts against Iran don't seem to be working. He insists the Iranian regime "is weaker than it has been in 47 years," but then notes how the range of their ballistic missiles is longer than ever. "Their missile capacity, unfortunately, has grown."
Mike Huckabee says war-weary Americans need to support the war because Iran plans to nuke us "the moment" they get a nuclear weapon. He also says they mustn't be allowed to drive up the price of oil and other goods by blocking the Hormuz Strait. (It's an affordability issue!)
Mark Levin throws a fit over Americans not wanting to fight Israel's wars, insisting that the "Greatest Generation" would be eager to fight Iran and wouldn't be complaining about higher prices. "I remember a time when America would say, 'Let's go! Let's destroy that country!'" He wonders if a draft would "work" today and insists that "the vast majority of us are utterly unaffected" by "what's going on in Iran."
Ben Shapiro proposes the US strike Iran's energy facilities and "walk away."
Bill O'Reilly to Ben Shapiro: "Researching you…there's almost a constant theme that you are a defender of Israel and Judaism. Would that be true?" Shapiro: "I mean, it's certainly true that I defend Israel… I would not say that that is my predominant characteristic…" (This is how he opened the interview, lmao)
Bari Weiss' "Free Press" has a podcast called "School of War" that's literally sponsored by the Dept of Defense's Maven Smart System ("powered by" Palantir). Their new episode features Ted Cruz lobbying for regime change in Iran and whining about Tucker Carlson/anti-Semitism.
Katie Pavlich evidently thinks it's a great idea that elderly Jewish women are getting armed and training with the Jewish gun group "Lox & Loaded" to fight Muslims they fear under Mamdani are going to come door to door to "take out" Jews and turn NYC into a Muslim caliphate.
🚨 Fox News just stealth-edited this report from Efrat Lachter (a former IDF spokeswoman) which claimed matter-of-factly that IRGC chief Ahmad Vahidi had "declared Wednesday" that Iran was "working on nuclear weapons." The report now says Vahidi "reportedly" said it and links to Channel 14 as the source. As YNet reported, the (almost certainly fake) quote first went viral after being shared by the Israeli propaganda…
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @informationliberation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Information Liberation” (@informationliberation), 5,353 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/informationliberation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.