Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Unoccupy America

Channel

Unoccupy America

@OhHeyFucQYou

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,276subscribers

+140 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001840238787
TypeChannel
Username@OhHeyFucQYou
Description#ChristIsKing #SaveTheChildren #itsthejews White Lives Matter
Created21 December 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/OhHeyFucQYou

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@navigatingthelies/147235 Aug 2026, 14:44 UTC@OhHeyFucQYou/90967 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC1.004.3 hours
@navigatingthelies/147276 Aug 2026, 01:29 UTC@OhHeyFucQYou/90976 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 02:57 UTC1.0088 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@navigatingthelies5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0047 minutes@navigatingthelies (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @navigatingthelies. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

8,1368,2768,2066 August 2026 — 8,136 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,146 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,159 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,163 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,166 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,208 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,236 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,255 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,246 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,247 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,219 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,201 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,180 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,167 subscribers26 September 2026 — 8,193 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,206 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,208 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,224 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,235 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,248 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,233 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,235 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,248 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,255 subscribers5 November 2026 — 8,276 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net +140. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,115–8,297 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 07:168,276+21
1 Nov 2026, 21:548,255+7
30 Oct 2026, 04:088,248+13
27 Oct 2026, 11:118,235+2
24 Oct 2026, 12:368,233-15
21 Oct 2026, 03:408,248+13
18 Oct 2026, 08:368,235+11
15 Oct 2026, 02:118,224+16
11 Oct 2026, 22:148,208+2
5 Oct 2026, 09:008,206+13
26 Sept 2026, 21:588,193+26
17 Sept 2026, 23:558,167-13
13 Sept 2026, 12:378,180-21
9 Sept 2026, 23:398,201-18
5 Sept 2026, 00:388,219-28
1 Sept 2026, 13:448,247+1
29 Aug 2026, 17:248,246-9
26 Aug 2026, 15:118,255+19
23 Aug 2026, 12:228,236+28
19 Aug 2026, 22:148,208first reading

Engagement

369 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.13%
avg views ÷ 8,276 subscribers
Avg views / post
259
92 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
92
of 369 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 83 of 92 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held369 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total23,864
Reactions total558
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 11:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈52,800
Videos
≈25,300
Links
≈26,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3h 44m
Average length
1m 40s

Measured directly from 135 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,503 reactions across 268 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯40627.0%
🔥15110.0%
😁1328.78%
❤1258.32%
👍1177.78%
🙏976.45%
😈684.52%
🤡573.79%
🖕543.59%
🤮422.79%
🤬392.59%
🤣372.46%
👏332.20%
⚡241.60%
😢181.20%
💩140.931%
👀90.599%
🏆70.466%
👎70.466%
🤯70.466%
24 further kinds593.93%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 282 of the 369 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,535 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 369 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 92 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 07:59 UTC91 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥1

Signed PhilThese 👻🇺🇸

7 Nov 2026, 05:12 UTC167 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

"The plan of the Great Reset is that you will die with nothing." Australian senator, Malcolm Roberts, dropping serious truth bombs about the WEF—and its dystopian Great Reset agenda—in the Australian parliament. Subscribe to @HATSTRUTH 🎩

👍4

Signed PhilThese 👻🇺🇸

7 Nov 2026, 04:51 UTC177 viewsread 7 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed PhilThese 👻🇺🇸

7 Nov 2026, 04:06 UTC227 viewsread 7 November 2026
Video

Pregame for next year

Signed PhilThese 👻🇺🇸

7 Nov 2026, 03:50 UTC220 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁3

Signed PhilThese 👻🇺🇸

7 Nov 2026, 03:17 UTC142 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Welcome to the West: Where Make-Believe Makes the "Rules"

👍2🖕1

Signed PhilThese 👻🇺🇸

7 Nov 2026, 03:17 UTC128 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Transgenderism: A Jewish invention What Boy George taught me about being Jewish

💯2❤1

Signed PhilThese 👻🇺🇸

7 Nov 2026, 03:17 UTC147 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Is Trump Really Anti-Trans? | MRETV Let's take a look at some of Trump's pre-planned talking points regarding certain topics and analyze what they really mean. 👀 – Make Humanity Great Again (2022) 👀 – It’s official! The national GOP platform has been stripped of all anti-LGBT language! Inclusion won! Thank you @realDonaldTrump! (2024)

🖕2👎1

Signed PhilThese 👻🇺🇸

7 Nov 2026, 03:16 UTC160 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Unworthy, but forever thankful

🙏4🖕1

Signed PhilThese 👻🇺🇸

7 Nov 2026, 03:16 UTC159 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

The 2026 “blue wave” was always the intended (orchestrated) outcome, just as 2024’s “red MAGA wave” was also. Neither was organic. Both are deliberate phases of a much larger, overarching PsyOp… The political pendulum’s constant swing from one extreme to the other is not natural, it is entirely by design IMO: this is all about doing away with left and right, and ultimately creating a centrist political party that w…

❤2👍2

Signed PhilThese 👻🇺🇸

7 Nov 2026, 03:16 UTC150 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍1💯1🖕1

Signed PhilThese 👻🇺🇸

Showing the 12 most recent of 369 posts we hold for @OhHeyFucQYou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

𝕀𝕟 𝕄𝕒𝕘𝕟𝕒 𝔼𝕩𝕔𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠
@inmagnaexcitatio · 19,225
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 2 October 2026
Old Glory Vortex
@Old_Glory_Vortex · 20,015
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 28 September 2026
Daily Bible Devotionals
@dailybibledevotionals2 · 19,902
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 27 September 2026
Midnight Rider Channel 🇺🇸
@realKarliBonne · 180,093
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026
🔴 Blazing Press 🔴 BP NEWS
@trumpetnews1 · 19,181
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 2 October 2026
Australiaforfreedom
@australiaforfreedom · 19,399
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 30 September 2026
The General
@GeneralMCNews · 142,505
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
Police frequency
@police_frequency · 69,106
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
Intelsky 🚨
@Intelsky · 20,323
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 September 2026
RealTimeNews™
@dailyrealtimenews · 19,174
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
UNN
@UnityNewsNetwork · 20,339
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 27 September 2026
The Library
@The_Library_II · 18,619
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 October 2026
Patri0tsareinContr0l ⭐️⭐️⭐️
@Patri0tsareinContr0l · 19,456
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 September 2026
Insider Paper
@insiderpaper · 107,904
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
Election Wizard
@realelectionwizard · 20,960
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Unoccupy America” (@OhHeyFucQYou), 8,276 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OhHeyFucQYou.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.