Simone Rizkallah should register as the agent of a foreign government. https://x.com/CathsAgainstJws/status/2092056086278738069

Channel
E. Michael Jones
@RealEMichaelJones
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
8,257subscribers
-42 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001493506330 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RealEMichaelJones |
| Created | 25 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RealEMichaelJones |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 8,257 | -16 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:43 | 8,273 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 8,275 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 8,272 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 8,280 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 8,277 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 8,284 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 8,282 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:20 | 8,284 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 8,294 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 8,299 | first reading |
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 27.3%
- avg views ÷ 8,257 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,260
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (6 July 2026 – 26 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20,300 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5m 21s
- Average length
- 1m 20s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Roy Schoeman nails it. Catholic-Jewish dialogue means Catholics selling their religion down the river.
Stream Starting! EMJ Live 183: Breaking the Yoke of Jewish Tyranny EMJ Live is every Friday at 5:00pm ET Call In - Telegram: t.me/EMichaelJonesChat?videochat YouTube: youtube.com/@E_Michael_Jones Rumble: rumble.com/c/c-920885 Twitter (X): twitter.com/emichaeljones1 Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/3KNrIgfrRRCjZG2Oa8bRmB CW Magazine: culturewars.com EMJ Books: fidelitypress.org
Which means every Jew is a spy working for another country. People like this should not be allowed to hold office. https://x.com/Parodyjeffx/status/2089731307014070434
Col. MacGregor: "wealthy Jews have managed to get control of our government." https://x.com/EMichaelJones1/status/2089877165399580954/video/1
I stand by what I said 34 years ago.
Stream Starting! EMJ Live 182: "If you let Jews in, they take over." EMJ Live is every Friday at 5:00pm ET Call In - Telegram: t.me/EMichaelJonesChat?videochat YouTube: youtube.com/@E_Michael_Jones Rumble: rumble.com/c/c-920885 Twitter (X): twitter.com/emichaeljones1 Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/3KNrIgfrRRCjZG2Oa8bRmB CW Magazine: culturewars.com EMJ Books: fidelitypress.org
As Father Hesburgh once said, "If you let the Jews in, they take over."
The Nazis used many words. Are all of them taboo? How about "Autobahn"? How about "Volkswagen"? We need a definitive list of taboo words, so that we don't inadvertently commit the sin of anti-Semitism. Get Bishop Bambera working on this. https://www.newsweek.com/zohran-mamdani-rebuked-by-israeli-diplomat-for-using-same-words-as-nazis-12294886
Repeal the health code to make way for gay sex? We've been down this road before. How did that work out in the 1970s? Ever hear of AIDS? AIDS wasn't caused by a virus. It was a lifestyle disease. And it will continue to be a lifestyle disease if they repeal the health code. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/08/nyregion/gay-bathhouses-ny-law.html
Stream Starting! EMJ Live 181: Breaking the Jew Taboo EMJ Live is every Friday at 5:00pm ET Call In - Telegram: t.me/EMichaelJonesChat?videochat YouTube: youtube.com/@E_Michael_Jones Rumble: rumble.com/c/c-920885 Twitter (X): twitter.com/emichaeljones1 Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/3KNrIgfrRRCjZG2Oa8bRmB CW Magazine: culturewars.com EMJ Books: fidelitypress.org
Cooper has clearly been reading my books. Why doesn't he cite them as his sources? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r77366-ea08&t=4166s
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @RealEMichaelJones. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nickjfuentes · 115,155
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 13 August 2026
@RealVincentJames · 28,400
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 9 September 2026
@keith_woods · 28,337
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 9 September 2026
@pjwnews · 38,175
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | E. Michael Jones |
|---|---|
| Description | Catholic traditionalist author and editor |
| X / Twitter | @EMichaelJones1 |
| YouTube | UCqu-4AY-501xV5iCtt7dMKQ |
| Official site | https://culturewars.com/e-michael-jones |
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“E. Michael Jones” (@RealEMichaelJones), 8,257 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RealEMichaelJones.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.