Channel
@horizont_telegram
On this record: Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,741subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001209450450 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @horizont_telegram |
| Description | YouTube: https://tinyurl.com/1pz8slts / Twitter: https://tinyurl.com/5sr6mxde / Odysee: https://tinyurl.com/1i5en5hy / GETTR: https://tinyurl.com/y5xzbev6 |
| Created | 27 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/horizont_telegram |
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
26,100 average views per post against 26,741 subscribers — an engagement rate of 97.5%. Across the 347 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,381 subscribers, posting mainly in German — the middle half sit between 10.1% and 28.6%, with a median of 17.7%.
| Window | 30 days (30 July 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 67 of 67 published in the window (0 exact, 67 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 1,746,220 |
| Mature posts only | 100.5% over 64 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 26,741 measured 28 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:deu · 347 channels · p10 4.95% · p25 10.1% · p50 17.7% · p75 28.6% · p90 46.9% |
| Position in cohort | 99.133th percentile · 5.5× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.109% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | German · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 29 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 26,741 | +4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 26,737 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 26,735 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 26,736 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:19 | 26,733 | +17 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 26,716 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 26,720 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 26,725 | +5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 26,720 | -8 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 26,728 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 26,733 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 26,735 | -6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 26,741 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 26,739 | -10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 26,749 | +8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 26,741 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 26,744 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 26,742 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 26,746 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:10 | 26,752 | first reading |
73 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 73 (27 July 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,740,088 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Nach der RTL-Sendung „Am Tisch mit Friedrich Merz“: Merz habe Kinderärztin Bea Merscher gesagt, dass ihre Äußerungen in der Sendung „straffällig“ gewesen seien. Wenn er das so gesagt hat, ist das eine indirekte Drohung nach dem Motto: Seien Sie künftig sehr vorsichtig. Merscher habe Merz außerdem ein weiteres Treffen angeboten, woraufhin er sie ausgelacht und „Ganz sicher nicht“ erwidert habe. Unfassbar.
Typisch ÖRR. Das ZDF hat im heute-show spezial (28.08.2026) Sandra Gabriel von Utopia TV und Aktivist Mann unkenntlich gemacht.
Grönemeyer und sein obsessiver KAMPF GEGEN RECHTS
Ob Ilse Aigner oder Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf – das Muster ist klar: Die SPD will ganz offensichtlich eine Bundespräsidentin, die ein AfD-Verbot vorantreibt.
25 Minuten wurde beim Schlagabtausch der Spitzenkandidaten über Migration geredet (MDR "Fakt ist!" zur Landtagswahl Sachsen-Anhalt). Das Foto, welches auf dem Bildschirm im Studio immer wieder zu sehen war, sollte natürlich die übliche Wirkung erzielen. Man kennt die Strategie bei der Bildauswahl ja seit 2015. Zwei Frauen, zwei Kinder und ein Mann im Grenzdurchgangslager Friedland – im Hintergrund ist die katholisc…
Nach dem TV-Duell wirkt es so, als gehöre die WELT nun zum Wahlkampfteam von Sven Schulze. Es ist das Gegenteil von Journalismus.
MDR-Moderator Gunnar Breske: „Ihre Parteivorsitzende hat am Wochenende alle Regierenden in Deutschland pauschal als Flachzangen bezeichnet, Herr Siegmund.“ Das ist falsch. Alice Weidel sagte: „Ich will nicht mehr angelogen werden von irgendwelchen Flachzangen, die da oben sitzen und irgendwas versprechen und genau das Gegenteil von dem tun.“ Danach nannte sie Merz und Klingbeil.
Sven Schulze echauffiert sich über den harmlosen Begriff „Flachzange“. Niemals vergessen: Lars Klingbeil hat Alice Weidel als „Nazi“ bezeichnet.
Sven Schulze (CDU) hat es gerade als Tatsache dargestellt, dass Martin Reichardt (AfD) im Jahr 2020 einen Hitlergruß gezeigt hat. Es gibt kein Gerichtsurteil dazu. Laut Landesvorstand handelte es sich um einen symbolischen Ritterschlag.
Die AfD liegt im gesamten Osten nun bei 43 Prozent. Die CDU dümpelt bei jämmerlichen 13 Prozent.
Nach den Recherchen von Apollo News ist Sven Hüber von seinem Posten als stellvertretender Vorsitzender der Gewerkschaft der Polizei (GdP) zurückgetreten. Deutschlandfunk: „Das rechtspopulistische Portal Apollo News [...]“ DIE ZEIT: „Das rechtsgerichtete Portal Apollo News [...]“ Sie mögen echten Journalismus einfach nicht.
Die Bundesregierung hat in der offiziellen Mitschrift des heutigen Pressestatements das folgende Zitat von Merz verändert. Das Wort „nur“ wurde weggelassen.
Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @horizont_telegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 807 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Horizont (YT: _horizont_ )” (@horizont_telegram), 26,741 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/horizont_telegram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.