Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GutmenschenKeule

Channel

GutmenschenKeule

@GutmenschenKeule

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,472subscribers

+1,049 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001155527603
TypeChannel
Username@GutmenschenKeule
Created7 January 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GutmenschenKeule

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17,41918,55817,988.56 August 2026 — 17,423 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,426 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,424 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,426 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,425 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,424 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,419 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,279 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,558 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,552 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,546 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,543 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,534 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,524 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,527 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,523 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,521 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,509 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,510 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,508 subscribers3 September 2026 — 18,500 subscribers5 September 2026 — 18,493 subscribers8 September 2026 — 18,488 subscribers11 September 2026 — 18,481 subscribers13 September 2026 — 18,474 subscribers15 September 2026 — 18,473 subscribers17 September 2026 — 18,472 subscribers18,4726 August 202617 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1,049. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,248–18,729 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 03:0018,472-1
15 Sept 2026, 05:3918,473-1
13 Sept 2026, 11:4018,474-7
11 Sept 2026, 15:1618,481-7
8 Sept 2026, 21:3818,488-5
5 Sept 2026, 16:3818,493-7
3 Sept 2026, 14:3618,500-8
2 Sept 2026, 05:5618,508-2
1 Sept 2026, 08:2518,510+1
31 Aug 2026, 06:2818,509-12
30 Aug 2026, 05:4318,521-2
29 Aug 2026, 03:2818,523-4
26 Aug 2026, 03:1818,527+3
25 Aug 2026, 01:4318,524-10
23 Aug 2026, 15:0218,534-9
20 Aug 2026, 18:0418,543-3
19 Aug 2026, 15:5818,546-6
18 Aug 2026, 13:5718,552-6
17 Aug 2026, 13:2318,558+279
16 Aug 2026, 08:0518,279first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.7%
avg views ÷ 18,472 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,260
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held51 (26 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total140,360
Reactions total7,200
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 08:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

26,564 reactions across 51 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣14,18253.4%
🤡6,01222.6%
💯3,31112.5%
😎5542.09%
🤬5101.92%
👍4981.87%
4851.83%
👏3961.49%
🤔2130.802%
🔥1920.723%
👎1320.497%
😢450.169%
😡340.128%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,564 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:33 UTC≈3,980 views389 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣284🤡75👏149💯5🔥2

31 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC≈6,220 views486 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Die AfD sollte die NGOs nicht gänzlich einstampfen. Nur die Busse für das Niederbrüllen von Regierungskritikern werden gestrichen. Aber die Netzaktivitäten sollten weiterhin unterstützt werden: Der Bullshit, den die NGO-Aktivisten im Netz verzapfen, ist die beste Wahlwerbung gegen linke Hirngülle.

💯250🤣154🤡45🤬199😎5👍4

30 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC≈6,560 views415 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣358🤡36👍8🔥64💯3

30 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC≈8,130 views466 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣43213👍8🤡7👏5😡1

29 Aug 2026, 21:40 UTC≈6,960 views372 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣299💯46😎12🤡87

29 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC≈7,130 views334 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣183💯104🤡22🔥15🤔82

28 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC≈8,070 views604 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Anzeige ist raus.

🤣51733🤡31🔥16👍5😢2

27 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC≈8,170 views396 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤡240🤣151🤬5

26 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC≈12,400 views431 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣288💯91🤬36🤡8😡71

26 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC≈8,740 views371 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯227🤣87🤔40🤡125

26 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC≈8,410 views460 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

"Diese verdammten Nazis und ihre... *zieht eine Karte* ...Mangas!"

🤣355🤡97🤔42😎2

25 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC≈9,010 views450 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣347💯8612🤔4👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @GutmenschenKeule. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Schanzenwatch-Broadcast
@drache208 · 52,986
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 7 September 2026
Clownswelt
@Clownswelt · 29,996
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
🔵 Martin Sellner [TELEGRAMELITE]
@martinsellnerIB · 72,106
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 August 2026
henning rosenbusch - Channel
@rosenbusch · 72,196
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
Tim K.
@timmkellner · 205,156
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
Horizont (YT: _horizont_ )
@horizont_telegram · 26,732
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 September 2026
Freie Sachsen
@freiesachsen · 109,785
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
COMPACT-Magazin
@CompactMagazin · 77,708
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
GlobalPatriots
@globalpatriots · 27,220
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026
Snicklink unzensiert
@snicklink3000 · 32,245
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
Mad in Germany ©️
@Mad_In_Germany · 22,193
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 21 September 2026
Lachen macht Freu(n)de
@LachenMachtFreude · 38,119
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 31 August 2026
Trau keinem Promi offiziell
@traukeinempromioffiziell · 39,613
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
Politische Bilder 😇
@PolitischeBilder · 69,321
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 August 2026
Paul Brandenburg
@paulbrandenburg · 45,438
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
Nius
@niusde · 34,645
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
achse:ostwest
@achseostwest · 26,444
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
Björn Höcke
@BjoernHoeckeAfD · 49,225
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GutmenschenKeule” (@GutmenschenKeule), 18,472 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GutmenschenKeule.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.