Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Prof. Dr. Martin Schwab Offiziell

Channel

Prof. Dr. Martin Schwab Offiziell

@MartinSchwab

Not marked by Telegram, checked 25 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,159subscribers

+34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002201252945
TypeChannel
Username@MartinSchwab
DescriptionJura-Professor, Uni Bielefeld
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held53
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/MartinSchwab

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

21,600 average views per post against 12,159 subscribers — an engagement rate of 177.3%. Across the 323 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,020–31,451 subscribers, posting mainly in German — the middle half sit between 8.93% and 28.2%, with a median of 16.2%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured18 of 18 published in the window (0 exact, 18 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled388,000
Mature posts only177.3% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers12,159 measured 4 November 2026
Cohortb10000:deu · 323 channels · p10 4.02% · p25 8.93% · p50 16.2% · p75 28.2% · p90 44.8%
Position in cohort100.000th percentile · 10.9× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.029% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageGerman · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

12,06612,15912,112.56 August 2026 — 12,125 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,125 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,128 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,125 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,122 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,119 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,123 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,122 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,121 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,119 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,115 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,111 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,110 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,115 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,117 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,108 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,106 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,109 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,107 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,109 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,107 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,108 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,106 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,103 subscribers7 September 2026 — 12,093 subscribers10 September 2026 — 12,087 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,083 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,093 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,096 subscribers30 September 2026 — 12,079 subscribers5 October 2026 — 12,066 subscribers10 October 2026 — 12,067 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,070 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,083 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,086 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,088 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,089 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,087 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,083 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,084 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,083 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,086 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,083 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,084 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,085 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,081 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,094 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,102 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,133 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,140 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,157 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,158 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,159 subscribers6 August 20264 November 2026
53 measurements spanning 90 days, net +34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,052–12,173 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 53
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 13:5112,159+1
3 Nov 2026, 13:4412,158+1
2 Nov 2026, 14:4612,157+17
1 Nov 2026, 13:1512,140+7
31 Oct 2026, 11:2012,133+31
30 Oct 2026, 13:2912,102+8
29 Oct 2026, 15:2912,094+13
28 Oct 2026, 12:0412,081-4
27 Oct 2026, 13:3812,085+1
25 Oct 2026, 12:4912,084+1
24 Oct 2026, 11:0512,083-3
23 Oct 2026, 08:5812,086+3
22 Oct 2026, 11:5012,083-1
21 Oct 2026, 08:2012,084+1
20 Oct 2026, 04:1812,083-4
19 Oct 2026, 06:3012,087-2
18 Oct 2026, 04:2912,089+1
17 Oct 2026, 04:4812,088+2
16 Oct 2026, 05:5712,086+3
15 Oct 2026, 02:4112,083first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
177.3%
avg views ÷ 12,159 subscribers
Avg views / post
21,600
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held56 (18 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total388,000
Reactions total4,780
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 07:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
213
Videos
17
Links
557

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

12,808 reactions across 56 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,85330.1%
❤2,68521.0%
💯2,38218.6%
👏7565.90%
🔥6465.04%
😢4773.72%
🤬4153.24%
🙏3582.80%
🤮2762.15%
🙈2191.71%
🕊1711.34%
🤣1010.789%
🤡950.742%
😁610.476%
🤯490.383%
🤔420.328%
⚡330.258%
🌭280.219%
🍾230.18%
🏆170.133%
22 further kinds1210.945%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,808 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (72.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 12:31 UTC≈7,180 views129 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

VOM VERFALL DER FREIHEIT Liebe Community, In Zeiten fortschreitender Zensur des Internets ist es wichtig, kritische Gedanken zum Handeln der Träger staatlicher Gewalt in gedruckter Form zu veröffentlichen und zu verbreiten. Die Autoren des hier gezeigten, von Prof. Dr. Henrieke Stahl herausgegebenen Buches haben eben dies getan. Einige der Beiträge enthalten die schriftliche Fassung von Vorträgen, die ich selbst m…

❤66👍48🙏8👏4🔥3

1 Nov 2026, 17:30 UTC≈41,700 views619 reactionsread 5 November 2026

SUCHARIT BHAKDI ZUM 80. GEBURTSTAG Liebe Community, Am 1.11.1946 erblickte ein Mensch das Licht der Welt, zu dem heute Millionen Menschen aufblicken: Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi vollendet heute sein 80. Lebensjahr! Sucharit Bhakdi erkannte im Frühjahr 2020 mithilfe seines überragenden Fachwissens sehr schnell, dass mit der Pandemie-Erzählung rund um SARS-CoV-2 hinten und vorne etwas nicht stimmen kann, und scheute s…

❤491👏53👍23🍾22🙏17🏆4🕊3🤡2

30 Oct 2026, 12:06 UTC≈42,000 views499 reactionsread 5 November 2026

HAFTBEFEHL - JETZT AUCH SCHON BEI BELEIDIGUNGSDELIKTEN? Liebe Community, Mit Entsetzen habe ich vernommen, dass Paul Brandenburg in Untersuchungshaft sitzt. Sein Verteidiger, Rechtsanwalt Markus Haintz, berichtet, dass ihm vier einfache Beleidigungen (§ 185 StGB) und zwei "Majestätsbeleidigungen" in der Form der Verleumdung (§§ 187, 188 Abs. 2 StGB) vorgeworfen werden, allesamt zum Nachteil von Berlins (Noch-)Regie…

👍253💯137❤58🙏32😱8🔥4🕊3🏆1

29 Oct 2026, 05:40 UTC≈31,500 views222 reactionsread 5 November 2026

WEM NÜTZEN DIE KRAWALLE? Teil 2 (Fortsetzung von 👆 Teil 1) Wir haben allen Grund, mit der Politik der Bundesregierung unzufrieden zu sein und uns gegen übergriffige Gesetze und Gesetzesvorhaben zur Wehr zu setzen. Aber wir dürfen unter gar keinen Umständen zur Gewalt greifen! Ich möchte nicht in der Haut von Menschen stecken, die für das kommende Wochenende friedliche Demonstrationen angemeldet haben. Lässt man die…

💯131👍38🔥26❤16👏5🙏5🤮1

29 Oct 2026, 05:40 UTC≈30,100 views159 reactionsread 5 November 2026

WEM NÜTZEN DIE KRAWALLE? Teil 1 Liebe Community, Mehrfach habe ich in meinen öffentlichen Beiträgen zur Kritik an den Corona-Maßnahmen, auch auf Demonstrationen, dazu aufgerufen, dass wir unbedingt friedlich bleiben müssen. Ich verabscheue Gewalt, und jene, die sie anwenden, liefern nur der Politik einen Grund, ihrerseits zur Gewalt gegen ihre eigenen Bürger zu greifen. Erinnern wir uns: (1) Unzählige Menschen ha…

🔥66👍40❤27💯22🙏3👏1

24 Oct 2026, 01:08 UTC≈10,500 views240 reactionsread 5 November 2026

MÜLLER – DEN NAMEN WIRD MAN SICH MERKEN MÜSSEN! Liebe Community, Hinter dieser zugegeben etwas launigen Überschrift verbirgt sich eine sehr ernste Angelegenheit. Es geht um mögliche Unregelmäßigkeiten bei der Landratswahl im Kreis Ostprignitz-Ruppin. Diese Wahl ist, wie die Tagesschau am 23.10.2026 berichtet, https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/regional/brandenburg/rbb-landratswahl-ostprignitz-ruppin-klage-gegen-guelt…

👍146💯42🙏28❤17🔥4👀3

20 Oct 2026, 11:34 UTC≈9,540 views129 reactionsread 5 November 2026

WEM NÜTZT DAS THEATER UM DIE PANDA-APOTHEKE IN BIELEFELD? Teil 1 Liebe Community, Sollte irgendjemand noch daran zweifeln, dass es Bielefeld wirklich gibt, wurden diese Zweifel in der vergangenen Woche nachdrücklich zerstreut durch ein Video, mit dem Elisabeth Kutter, Inhaberin der Panda Apotheke in Bielefeld viral gegangen ist. In diesem vielbeachteten Video spricht Elisabeth Kutter allen Menschen, die der AfD nah…

🙈55❤30👍20💊6🤯4🕊3🤔3🙏3

20 Oct 2026, 11:34 UTC≈10,100 views300 reactionsread 5 November 2026

WEM NÜTZT DAS THEATER UM DIE PANDA-APOTHEKE IN BIELEFELD? Teil 2 (Fortsetzung von 👆 Teil 1) Das Lager der „Gutenden“ formiert sich und bekräftigt den eigenen Anspruch angeblicher moralischer Überlegenheit – auf dass die Spaltung der Gesellschaft weiter voranschreite. Angeblich soll es gegen Elisabeth Kutter und ihr Team Gewaltdrohungen gegeben haben. Ich habe das nicht überprüft. Aber wenn es diese Drohungen gegeben…

❤138💯101👍42🕊7🙏5🔥4🍌1🥰1

16 Oct 2026, 00:40 UTC≈10,900 views231 reactionsread 5 November 2026

„MAJESTÄTSBELEIDIGUNG“ ALS STRAFTAT – DREHT SICH JETZT DER WIND? Teil 2 (Fortsetzung von 👆 Teil 1) 4. Zudem sollte in die Strafprozessordnung eine Regelung eingeführt werden, wonach Hausdurchsuchungen wegen Meinungsdelikten unzulässig sind. Ich erinnere an den unrühmlichen Auftritt von drei Göttinger Staatsanwälten im US-Magazin „60 Minutes“ im Februar 2025. Darin brüsteten sich jene Staatsanwälte damit, dass schon …

👍136💯43👏23❤17🕊7🤡2👎1🥱1

16 Oct 2026, 00:40 UTC≈8,680 views123 reactionsread 5 November 2026

„MAJESTÄTSBELEIDIGUNG“ ALS STRAFTAT – DREHT SICH JETZT DER WIND? Teil 1 Liebe Community. Wie t-online am 15.10-2026 berichtete, https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/deutschland/id_101482894/halle-ermittlungen-gegen-juedische-studenten-nach-synagogen-protest.html?utm_source=firefox-newtab-de-de ermittelt die Staatsanwaltschaft aktuell gegen jüdische Studenten, die den stellvertretenden Vorsitzenden des AfD-Landesverb…

👍81❤33🔥7🙏2

14 Oct 2026, 23:38 UTC≈15,100 views178 reactionsread 5 November 2026

MUTIGE ÄRZTE UND FURCHTBARE JURISTEN Teil 4 (Fortsetzung von 👆 Teil 3) (10) ein Amtsrichter, der eine Angeklagte in erster Instanz wegen der angeblichen Herstellung dreier gefälschter negativer Corona-Testzertifikate verurteilte, dabei im Strafmaß noch über die Forderung der Staatsanwaltschaft hinausging und der Angeklagten bei der Urteilsverkündung vorwarf: „Wegen Leuten wie Ihnen waren wir jahrelang gefährdet und …

❤88👍51👏15💯12🙏9✍1👌1🤔1

14 Oct 2026, 23:38 UTC≈15,200 views159 reactionsread 5 November 2026

MUTIGE ÄRZTE UND FURCHTBARE JURISTEN Teil 3 (Fortsetzung von 👆 Teil 2) (6) jene Verwaltungsrichter, die – ohne dass der Wortlaut der Corona-Verordnungen dazu gezwungen hätte – urteilten, ein Maskenattest müsse eine Diagnose enthalten (erstmals VG Würzburg v. 16.9.2020 – W 8 E 20.1301). Man stelle sich eine Frau vor, die deshalb keine Maske tragen kann, weil dies das Trauma einer früher erlebten Vergewaltigung wieder…

❤73👍54👏16🔥10✍2💯2🙏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @MartinSchwab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republished by 77 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.

Anwälte-für-Aufklärung
@Anwaelte_fuer_Aufklaerung · 47,944
14 posts
▫️Rechtsanwältin Beate Bahner
@rechtsanwaeltin_beate_bahner · 81,954
10 posts
impfen-nein-danke.de offiziell | Vorsprung durch Wissen
@impfen_nein_danke · 12,295
6 posts
Care4Truth — Masken tragen; ein Risiko?
@Care4Truth · 1,013
5 posts
Bleib Stark 🤜🤛
@bleibtstark · 25,554
4 posts
HAINTZ.media 🇩🇪🇦🇹🇨🇭🇪🇸
@Haintz · 72,296
3 posts
Kanal Freiheit und Selbstbestimmung
@Kanal_Freiheit · 54
3 posts
Reiner Fuellmich 🇩🇪/🇦🇹/🇨🇭
@ReinerFuellmich · 89,399
3 posts
Der Waldgang
@WaldgangAlbdruck · 14,512
3 posts
AllerleyRaum
@allerleyraum_status · 182
3 posts
[ST] Demokratische Montagsspaziergänge Sachsen-Anhalt
@demo_sachsenanhalt_montag · 37
3 posts
®INFOKANAL ElternStehenAuf e.V
@eltern_stehen_auf · 13,484
3 posts
Oliver Janich & Team
@oliverjanich · 106,257
3 posts
KAI STUHT - Offizieller Kanal
@KaiStuht · 19,056
2 posts
Psychotherapeut*innen stehen auf!- Infokanal 🦋 offiziell
@PT_stehen_auf · 1,429
2 posts
Archiv - Solinger Widerstand
@SolingerWiderstandArchiv · 19
2 posts
WHO Pakt Nein!
@WHOPaktNein · 90
2 posts
dieBasis BW Infokanal
@dieBasisBW · 478
2 posts
Freie Linke Zukunft Nachrichten
@freielinke · 2,544
2 posts
Et bliev nix wie et wor
@friedenundwahrhaftigkeit · 9
2 posts
Gegenoffensive
@gegenoffensive · 127
2 posts
Mündige Bürger Viersen
@muendigebuergerviersen · 75
2 posts
Naturheilpraxis Gabriele Drews - Heilpraktikerin
@naturheilpraxislehrte · 7
2 posts
henning rosenbusch - Channel
@rosenbusch · 71,610
2 posts
❤️Frangipani❤️
@wirsinddubist · 108
2 posts
Ärztlicher Berufsverband Hippokratischer Eid
@Aerzte_hippokratischer_Eid · 6,322
1 post
Alles Ausser Mainstream
@AllesAusserMainstream · 108,426
1 post
ChristenStehenAuf
@ChristenStehenAuf_de · 795
1 post
David gegen COVID
@David_vs_Covid · 845
1 post
Die Bielefeld Bewegung
@DieBielefeldBewegung · 83
1 post
🍀Freiheit macht Wahr, Wahrheit macht Frei🍀
@FrMaWa · 54,769
1 post
Für alle Kinder!
@Fuer_alle_Kinder · 962
1 post
📯 BÜRGERINFORMATIVE - 🗞 News
@buergerinformative · 7,654
1 post
Covid-Injektion & Co. Sicherheit - Wirksamkeit - Notwendigkeit
@covidimpf · 14,115
1 post
Dave Brych Kanal
@davebrych_public · 27,408
1 post
[BB] Demokratische Montagsspaziergänge Brandenburg
@demo_brandenburg_montag · 66
1 post
[HB] Demokratische Montagsspaziergänge Bremen
@demo_bremen_montag · 49
1 post
[MV] Demokratische Montagsspaziergänge Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
@demo_meckpom_montag · 84
1 post
[NI] Demokratische Montagsspaziergänge Niedersachsen
@demo_niedersachsen_montag · 100
1 post
[RP] Demokratische Montagsspaziergänge Rheinland-Pfalz
@demo_rheinlandpfalz_montag · 134
1 post
[SL] Demokratische Montagsspaziergänge Saarland
@demo_saarland_montag · 42
1 post
[SN] Demokratische Montagsspaziergänge Sachsen
@demo_sachsen_montag · 95
1 post
[SH] Demokratische Montagsspaziergänge Schleswig-Holstein
@demo_schleswigholstein_montag · 93
1 post
[TH] Demokratische Montagsspaziergänge Thüringen
@demo_thueringen_montag · 47
1 post
Deppenkanal 🙈🤡
@deppenkanal · 1
1 post
Die Jaworskis (offiziell)
@diejaworskis_offiziell · 10,010
1 post
Dr. Philip Zeschmann
@drphilipzeschmann · 37
1 post
Eltern für Ihre Kinder NRW
@eltern_fuer_ihre_kinder_nrw · 140
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Kanal Rechtsanwalt Dirk Sattelmaier
@rasattelmaier · 38,428
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
Aya Velázquez
@ayawasgeht · 21,482
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 September 2026
Rolf Kron - Ärzte stehen auf Offizieller Kanal
@Rolf_Kron · 43,815
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
Tom Lausen ‼️❗️original Datenanalyst
@TomLausen · 45,189
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
RA Ludwig - Querdenkeranwalt
@RA_Ludwig · 63,028
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 August 2026
Dr. med. Carola Javid- Kistel MITEINANDER MUTIG SEIN- ÄRZTE STEHEN AUF FÜR PATIENTEN.....🙏❤
@miteinander_mutig_sein · 27,073
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 September 2026
Multipolar Magazin
@multipolar_magazin · 22,722
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
Martin Sichert Infokanal
@martinsichertinfo · 20,942
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 September 2026
Reiner Fuellmich 🇩🇪/🇦🇹/🇨🇭
@ReinerFuellmich · 89,399
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026
Friedrich - Partner Offizieller News Kanal
@friedrichpartner · 29,232
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Prof. Dr. Martin Schwab Offiziell” (@MartinSchwab), 12,159 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MartinSchwab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.