Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Friedrich - Partner Offizieller News Kanal

Channel

Friedrich - Partner Offizieller News Kanal

@friedrichpartner

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

29,114subscribers

+1,347 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001298267509
TypeChannel
Username@friedrichpartner
Descriptionhttps://www.friedrich-partner.de/ 📺 Youtube https://www.youtube.com/c/MarcFriedrich7 🐦 Twitter https://twitter.com/marcfriedrich 📸 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/marcfriedrich7 Gold & Silber kaufen (Affiliate): https://go.flexgold.com/c/0UH1E
Created20 May 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/friedrichpartner

Growth

27,76729,11828,442.56 August 2026 — 27,767 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,776 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,788 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,795 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,792 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,785 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,788 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,791 subscribers15 August 2026 — 27,792 subscribers16 August 2026 — 27,944 subscribers17 August 2026 — 27,947 subscribers19 August 2026 — 27,948 subscribers20 August 2026 — 27,946 subscribers21 August 2026 — 28,098 subscribers23 August 2026 — 28,667 subscribers24 August 2026 — 28,831 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,864 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,866 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,870 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,867 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,089 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29,113 subscribers1 September 2026 — 29,118 subscribers2 September 2026 — 29,114 subscribers29,1146 August 20262 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 27 days, net +1,347. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,564–29,321 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 02:3429,114-4
1 Sept 2026, 03:3829,118+5
31 Aug 2026, 06:2829,113+24
30 Aug 2026, 06:4329,089+222
29 Aug 2026, 03:4328,867-3
28 Aug 2026, 01:5328,870+4
26 Aug 2026, 23:1128,866+2
25 Aug 2026, 21:4328,864+33
24 Aug 2026, 18:2428,831+164
23 Aug 2026, 04:0728,667+569
21 Aug 2026, 17:5728,098+152
20 Aug 2026, 13:4327,946-2
19 Aug 2026, 13:0327,948+1
17 Aug 2026, 17:5627,947+3
16 Aug 2026, 15:1327,944+152
15 Aug 2026, 01:0427,792+1
12 Aug 2026, 16:4527,791+3
11 Aug 2026, 14:4227,788+3
10 Aug 2026, 16:3127,785-7
9 Aug 2026, 17:4227,792first reading

Engagement

88 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.7%
avg views ÷ 29,114 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,510
73 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.814%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
73
of 88 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held88 (28 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total694,060
Reactions total5,652
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 21:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,080
Videos
190
Links
2,040

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 13s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,508 reactions across 88 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,92344.9%
1,29719.9%
🤣5378.25%
🔥4757.30%
👏2694.13%
🤮2133.27%
💯1922.95%
😢951.46%
😁570.876%
🤔530.814%
🍾520.799%
🙏500.768%
👎390.599%
🤡280.43%
🤬270.415%
💩210.323%
😎210.323%
🤷‍♂190.292%
👌180.277%
🥱180.277%
18 further kinds1041.60%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 88 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,508 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 88 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @friedrichpartner. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 88 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 15:45 UTC≈3,970 views81 reactionsread 2 September 2026

ACHTUNG: das hier ist mein einziger Telegram Kanal - alle anderen, auch wenn sie größer sind, sind fakes und scams. Löscht die bitte, informiert eure Bekannten und Freunde und meldet es. Nur dieser hier ist der einzig wahre.

👍64💯124🙏1

2 Sept 2026, 10:49 UTC≈5,160 views32 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

📩 Finanzielle Intelligenz direkt ins Postfach Einmal pro Woche versorgen wir dich in unserem kostenlosen Newsletter mit wichtigen Impulsen rund um Finanzen, Märkte und Vermögensaufbau. Außerdem erfährst du dort als Erstes von Neuigkeiten, neuen Produkten und aktuellen Entwicklungen aus unserem Haus. 👉 Jetzt kostenlos anmelden und nichts mehr verpassen: https://www.friedrich-partner.de/newsletter

20👍9🥰3

2 Sept 2026, 03:30 UTC≈6,070 views54 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Was haltet ihr von meiner Idee/Vorschlag? https://youtu.be/6BR6adm9Xbk

🔥2615👏5🤔5🤪3

1 Sept 2026, 17:01 UTC≈6,960 views72 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Photo

Bitcoin war erst der Anfang: Jetzt kommt die politische Revolution 👉 https://youtu.be/6BR6adm9Xbk Bitcoin ist mehr als nur Geld – aber könnte die Idee dahinter sogar als Blaupause für ein völlig neues politisches System dienen? In diesem Vortrag geht Marc Friedrich der Frage nach, was passiert, wenn man die Prinzipien von Bitcoin auf Politik und Gesellschaft überträgt. Es geht um Macht und Geldhoheit, den digitale

40👍17🔥10🤡4🥰1

1 Sept 2026, 13:07 UTC≈6,850 views72 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Diese Korrektur bei Edelmetallen ist notwendig und gesund. Antizyklisch nutzen!

👍5610👌4👎2

1 Sept 2026, 06:08 UTC≈7,430 views75 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Du musst limitierte Werte besitzen - durch die Natur oder durch die Mathematik limitiert https://friedrich.report

👍53🔥182🥰2

31 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC≈7,860 views42 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Wir suchen neue Kollegen https://www.marc-friedrich.de/jobs

👍2014🍾3🤔3👌1🤓1

31 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC≈7,710 views82 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Rohstoffe sind historisch günstig

👍61👏9🤡72🔥21

31 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC≈7,810 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Deutscher Milliardär exklusiv im Interview zu Deutschland, Politik, KI und Longevity https://youtu.be/aXERdMR0psw

👍87👎3🤔2🫡2😴2

30 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC≈8,490 views64 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

So wirst du 150-Jahre-alt! (Interview Christian Angermayer) 👉 https://youtu.be/aXERdMR0psw Warum verliert Deutschland den Anschluss und welche Technologien verändern die Welt in den nächsten Jahren? In diesem Gespräch mit Christian Angermayer geht es um künstliche Intelligenz, Langlebigkeit, Gesundheit, Politik und die größten Chancen unserer Zeit. Besonders interessant wird es, wenn Angermayer über den Traum viele

33🤔13👍7👎5🙏4🐳2

29 Aug 2026, 01:23 UTC≈9,660 views150 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Jeden Tag!

😢83👍34🌭14🖕86🤨5

28 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC≈10,300 views62 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Du musst Kupferaktien besitzen! Die besten Kupferminen gibt’s nur im https://friedrich.report

👍3613🖕5🤔5💩2🤮1

Showing the 12 most recent of 88 posts we hold for @friedrichpartner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 896,260 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Silberjunge Thorsten Schulte OFFIZIELL
@silberjungethorstenschulte · 76,663
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
MICHAEL WENDLER 🚨 & TEAM
@michaelwendlerlive · 41,396
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 29 August 2026
Dr. Daniele Ganser
@DanieleGanser · 73,813
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Friedrich - Partner Offizieller News Kanal” (@friedrichpartner), 29,114 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/friedrichpartner.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.