Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
21,900 average views per post against 30,347 subscribers — an engagement rate of 72.2%. Across the 48,075 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,621 subscribers — the middle half sit between 3.39% and 15.2%, with a median of 7.60%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (23 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Posts measured
28 of 28 published in the window (0 exact, 28 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
613,700
Mature posts only
72.2% over 28 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 22 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -159. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,323–30,530 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 15:01
30,347
-17
16 Sept 2026, 05:40
30,364
-15
14 Sept 2026, 13:01
30,379
-17
13 Sept 2026, 01:59
30,396
-7
11 Sept 2026, 05:38
30,403
-26
8 Sept 2026, 09:01
30,429
-17
5 Sept 2026, 04:56
30,446
-6
3 Sept 2026, 11:59
30,452
+22
2 Sept 2026, 06:44
30,430
+13
1 Sept 2026, 09:16
30,417
-14
31 Aug 2026, 05:54
30,431
-2
30 Aug 2026, 07:56
30,433
-4
29 Aug 2026, 05:37
30,437
-6
28 Aug 2026, 04:16
30,443
-2
27 Aug 2026, 03:43
30,445
+24
26 Aug 2026, 00:23
30,421
+10
25 Aug 2026, 00:09
30,411
-25
23 Aug 2026, 12:02
30,436
-17
21 Aug 2026, 21:28
30,453
-3
20 Aug 2026, 20:44
30,456
first reading
Engagement
53 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
72.2%
avg views ÷ 30,347 subscribers
Avg views / post
21,900
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 53 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 September 2026
Posts held
53 (7 July 2026 – 16 September 2026)
Views total
613,700
Reactions total
7,175
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
21 Sept 2026, 23:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,680
Videos
≈1,380
Links
≈5,940
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 57m
Average length
8m 27s
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
14,645 reactions across 53 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
5,263
35.9%
💯
4,126
28.2%
❤
2,016
13.8%
🔥
1,622
11.1%
👏
531
3.63%
🙏
358
2.44%
⚡
333
2.27%
🕊
166
1.13%
🥰
95
0.649%
🫡
59
0.403%
🏆
36
0.246%
❤🔥
31
0.212%
😍
9
0.061%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,645 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 16 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Der EU-Abgeordnete und langjährige UN-Diplomat Michael von der Schulenburg warnt die Bundesregierung!
Die sogenannte Feindstaatenklausel, die in bestimmten Fällen auch militärisches Vorgehen gegen die ehemaligen Achselmächte erlaubt, ist weder vergessen noch obsolet….
…Bereits zuvor, so die Argumentation der Bundesregierung, hätten die vier Siegermächte im Zwei-plus-Vier-Vertrag auf ihre besonderen Rechte gegenüber…
"Wenn einer es baut, sterben alle"
Die KI-Riesen stecken in einem gefährlichen Teufelskreis
Jacob Coxon hätte wohl nie gedacht, dass er die Firma, bei der er gerade erst aus Überzeugung angefangen hatte, so schnell wieder verlassen würde. Der 27-jährige Brite ist Mathematiker und trainierte bis vor Kurzem KI-Modelle bei OpenAI, bevor er anschließend zu Anthropic wechselte, weil die Firma größeren Wert auf Sicherhei…
TEIL 2/2
Sichtbar ist, daß dieses System bereits massive Probleme hat, um alles durchziehen zu können.
Die Umsetzung muß immer wieder neu koordiniert werden.
Doch die Ergebnisse bleiben aus.
Und hier stellt sich natürlich die Frage, warum das so ist.
Nun, die Menschen machen bei vielen Dingen nicht mehr mit. Sie spüren, daß sie gemolken werden.
So sollen sie weiter ihrer Freiheit beraubt werden, noch mehr Kontrolle …
♦️ARMINIUS ERBEN - SONDERBERICHT
📝Gedanken zum 9.9.2026
TEIL 1/2
Die Welt kann sich in ihren Grenzen nicht mehr halten.
Die Schönheit der Natur legt sich wie ein sanfter Hauch über die Schwere der Herzen.
Der Zeitgeist wütet, sichtbar in Auswüchsen wider des Seins.
Die natürliche Ordnung wurde mißachtet, vergewaltigt und versucht einzusperren.
Und dennoch wird es nicht gelingen!
Menschen werden immer mehr erwach…
TEIL 3/3
Aber die Renditedifferenz zwischen französischen und deutschen Anleihen, der zusätzliche Zins, den Frankreich Gläubigern bieten muss, um sie zum Halten seiner riskanteren Schulden zu bewegen, liegt nun nahe bei einem Prozentpunkt. Die Fragmentierung der Zinsen unter den EU-Ländern ist immer noch weit von den Niveaus entfernt, die während der Eurozonenkrise der 2010er Jahre zu sehen waren. Das ist größtentei…
TEIL 2/3
Amerika hat einen enormen Schuldenberg.
Aber Europa hat ein ebenso enormes Schuldenproblem.
Das Größenproblem Frankreichs im Herzen der EU
Teuropäer zu sein bedeutet, feine Küche, fußgängerfreundliche Städte und ständige Klagen über die vielen Bereiche zu erleben, in denen die eigene Wirtschaft hinter der amerikanischen zurückbleibt. In den letzten Jahren haben sich gewichtige Berichte über Europas sinken…
‼️Anmerkung:
Dies haben wir bereits vor 4 Jahren hier im Kanal angekündigt
The Economist
Der finanzielle Ruin Frankreichs wird für die gesamte EU zur Katastrophe
@arminius_erben
Teil 1/3👇
X-Beitrag
In Spanien hat das Volk genug von illegaler Massenmigration und der sozialistischen Regierung.
Massenproteste im ganzen Land.
Von Madrid bis Bilbao fordert man Sánchez Rücktritt.
In den deutschen Medien???
FUNKSTILLE bei
ARD
ZDF
Bild
SZ
Spiegel
FAZ
usw.
@arminius_erben
Ohne Vorlage jeglicher Beweise oder Argumente machten die deutschen Behörden Russland für die Vorbereitung der angeblich beabsichtigten Sabotage verantwortlich. Unter Verweis auf die „zunehmenden hybriden Angriffe Moskaus“ wurde die Verhängung weitreichender Sanktionen sowohl auf Ebene der Europäischen Union als auch bilateral angekündigt. Zu den letzteren zählen insbesondere die Schließung des Generalkonsulats der R…
Uncut News
‼️‼️‼️
@RusBotschaft
François Fillon, der zweitlängst amtierende Premierminister Frankreichs, hat gerade gesagt, dass „die bedeutendste ausländische Einmischung“, mit der Europa konfrontiert ist, „zunächst und vor allem die der Amerikaner“ sei und die Amerikaner „ständig in die Organisation europäischer Länder eingreifen“.
@arminius_erben
👇👇👇
Er argumentiert, dass der demografische Wandel in Großbritannien und anderen westlichen Staaten kein zufälliger Prozess sei, sondern politisch gewollt und vorangetrieben werde.
Er stellt die Frage, wer diese Entwicklung betreibe und warum die Bevölkerung über eine derart tiefgreifende Veränderung ihrer Gesellschaft nie direkt abstimmen durfte.
„Die Bevölkerung will das offensichtlich nicht“, sagt Carlson.
„Es gibt k…
👍152💯64❤24🙏18⚡10👏2🫡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @arminius_erben. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 47 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Wahrheitsjäger @Wahrheits_jaeger · 83,480 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
Silberjunge Thorsten Schulte OFFIZIELL @silberjungethorstenschulte · 76,471 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
SC-360* Media @SC360Media · 34,095 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 3 September 2026
Die WAHRsager – Wissen bewegt! @derwahrsagerwissenbewegt · 55,570 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 23 August 2026
Friedrich - Partner Offizieller News Kanal @friedrichpartner · 29,203 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
Metropol Chronicles @metropolchronicles · 25,459 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 September 2026
Herzkrieger @infoHerzkrieger · 25,931 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
UNN - Unabhängig-Neutrale Nachrichten @unabhaengig_neutral · 22,395 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 20 September 2026
Veikko aka Son Go Q @BitchBotBoiiLive · 71,467 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 August 2026
🌘 Der andere Blickwinkel 🌒 @Blickwinkel · 73,374 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
Traugott Ickeroth - Der Sturm ist da! @ti_origin · 23,649 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 18 September 2026
Lichtweiser @lichtweiser · 45,888 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 August 2026
Politik Spezial @PolitikSpezial · 26,823 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
Lohrey Training🌞🌞🌞 @lohreytraining · 24,155 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 September 2026
HaJos Gedanken @hajosgedanken_offiziell · 31,605 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 5 September 2026
Krisenrat.info Peter Denk @krisenrat · 34,935 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 2 September 2026
Tom Lausen ‼️❗️original Datenanalyst @TomLausen · 45,533 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
AKASHA.TV @akasha_tv · 28,644 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 9 September 2026
Schwurblerhumor😁 @schwurblerhumor · 38,344 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
Kanal Rechtsanwalt Dirk Sattelmaier @rasattelmaier · 38,923 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
Gute Nachrichten & Vibes @GuteNachrichtenNews · 43,869 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
MARKmobil @MARKmobil · 116,560 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
MMnews offiziell @mmnews_offiziell · 30,079 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 7 September 2026
LION Media TV @LIONMediaTV · 104,448 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Arminius Erben” (@arminius_erben), 30,347 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arminius_erben.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
