Dieser Kanal ist der einzige Telegram Kanal zur Information meiner Leser und Zuschauer. Andere Kanäle, die meinen Namen und mein Bild nutzen, sind nicht von mir und von Dritten in betrügerischer Absicht erstellt.
Created
24 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
32,700 average views per post against 35,009 subscribers — an engagement rate of 93.3%. Across the 24,485 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,991 subscribers — the middle half sit between 2.62% and 15.2%, with a median of 6.82%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (12 August 2026 – 11 September 2026)
Posts measured
9 of 9 published in the window (0 exact, 9 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
294,000
Mature posts only
93.3% over 9 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 11 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 34 days, net -268. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,969–35,317 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 08:39
35,009
-16
6 Sept 2026, 01:37
35,025
-17
3 Sept 2026, 18:36
35,042
-2
2 Sept 2026, 11:04
35,044
-6
1 Sept 2026, 10:37
35,050
-7
31 Aug 2026, 13:02
35,057
-8
30 Aug 2026, 16:13
35,065
-15
29 Aug 2026, 16:34
35,080
-4
28 Aug 2026, 15:26
35,084
-4
27 Aug 2026, 11:56
35,088
-9
26 Aug 2026, 13:03
35,097
-9
25 Aug 2026, 10:17
35,106
-12
24 Aug 2026, 11:39
35,118
-7
22 Aug 2026, 18:04
35,125
-9
21 Aug 2026, 05:42
35,134
-4
20 Aug 2026, 08:27
35,138
-7
18 Aug 2026, 12:35
35,145
-5
17 Aug 2026, 12:29
35,150
-21
16 Aug 2026, 04:24
35,171
-23
14 Aug 2026, 15:59
35,194
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
93.3%
avg views ÷ 35,009 subscribers
Avg views / post
32,700
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
9
of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026
Posts held
31 (31 May 2026 – 8 September 2026)
Views total
294,000
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Sept 2026, 01:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈403
Videos
≈291
Links
≈1,350
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 31m
Average length
1h 15m
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
AUDIO DATEI
DENKanstoß - August 2026 - Denk & Mittas Im Auftrag des Herren
WEITERE INFOS ZUR SENDUNG:
https://outoftheboxtvderschwachsinnhatprogramm.wordpress.com/2026/08/15/denkanstoss-august-2026-denk-mittas-im-auftrag-des-herren/
PETER DENK: HTTP://KRISENRAT.INFO
https://www.krisenrat.info/kongress2026.html
2026 wird an dem Wochenende 26./27. September wieder ein Kongress mit dem Titel „Wege aus der Matrix“ stattfinden. 2026 sind wir auf die Zielgerade der großen Wende eingebogen, die ganz großen Veränderungen haben eingesetzt. Was passiert aktuell und was wird kommen?
Dazu habe ich mir wieder hochkompetente Gäste eingeladen, die von sehr konkreten und fassbaren Bereichen d…
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @krisenrat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
DENKanstoß - Der Streaming und Info Kanal zur Sendung mit Peter Denk und Manuel C Mittas @DENKdasaktuelleWeltgeschehen · 10,043#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Bewusst TV - Jo Conrad @BewusstTV · 42,010 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
🌘 Der andere Blickwinkel 🌒 @Blickwinkel · 73,602 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
Lichtweiser @lichtweiser · 45,784 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 August 2026
HaJos Gedanken @hajosgedanken_offiziell · 31,704 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 5 September 2026
WissenSchafft Freiheit @WissenSchafftFreiheit · 46,373 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
fuf media - Freiheit denken @fufmedia · 55,852 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 August 2026
Matthias Langwasser Offiziell @matthiaslangwasser · 63,078 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 21 August 2026
Birgit Fischer official @mediumbirgitfischer · 81,947 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Sun Evo News @sunevonews · 40,915 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
Kai Brenner - Per Du mit dem Leben😃 @kaibrenner · 42,648 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
BaumMentor die EnergieKultur @BFE_Energiekultur · 60,905 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 22 August 2026
True Bavaria @Qbavaria · 27,409 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 September 2026
Christina von Dreien Offiziell @christinavondreien · 27,261 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
Germanische Heilkunde @JensNobis · 45,734 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 August 2026
🔎 Graphene Agenda 💉 @GrapheneAgenda · 70,941 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
Kai Orak @kaiorak · 34,479 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 3 September 2026
Digitaler Chronist @DigitalChronist · 29,582 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
AKASHA.TV @akasha_tv · 28,693 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 9 September 2026
Wahrheitsjäger @Wahrheits_jaeger · 83,496 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
Sören Schumann - Gesundheit Ganzheitlich @soeren_schumann · 59,961 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 22 August 2026
Heiko Schöning offiziell @heiko_schoening · 33,883 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
Schwurblerhumor😁 @schwurblerhumor · 38,398 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
MARKmobil @MARKmobil · 116,724 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
Dirk Dietrich @DDDDoffiziell · 56,065 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Krisenrat.info Peter Denk” (@krisenrat), 35,009 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krisenrat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.