Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
30,000 average views per post against 40,386 subscribers — an engagement rate of 74.4%. Across the 23,599 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,997 subscribers — the middle half sit between 2.65% and 15.1%, with a median of 6.81%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
27 of 27 published in the window (0 exact, 27 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
811,200
Mature posts only
76.3% over 26 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 92 days, net -481. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,304–40,929 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 15:06
40,376
-2
5 Nov 2026, 17:58
40,378
-8
4 Nov 2026, 21:06
40,386
-9
3 Nov 2026, 21:20
40,395
-7
2 Nov 2026, 21:49
40,402
-8
1 Nov 2026, 22:05
40,410
-17
31 Oct 2026, 22:21
40,427
-9
31 Oct 2026, 00:44
40,436
-4
29 Oct 2026, 21:45
40,440
-10
28 Oct 2026, 22:07
40,450
-9
27 Oct 2026, 19:00
40,459
-2
26 Oct 2026, 17:00
40,461
-8
25 Oct 2026, 16:27
40,469
-15
24 Oct 2026, 18:18
40,484
-11
23 Oct 2026, 16:45
40,495
-5
22 Oct 2026, 15:50
40,500
-11
21 Oct 2026, 08:06
40,511
-10
20 Oct 2026, 02:29
40,521
-1
19 Oct 2026, 04:27
40,522
-8
18 Oct 2026, 07:55
40,530
first reading
Engagement
103 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 175 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
74.5%
avg views ÷ 40,376 subscribers
Avg views / post
30,100
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
27
of 103 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
103 (14 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
812,300
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 09:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
31m 17s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 51 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Showing the 12 most recent of 103 posts we hold for @Lachkanal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Lachkanal edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
6 September 2026
Most recent edit
6 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 36 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Lachen macht Freu(n)de @LachenMachtFreude · 37,185 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 31 August 2026
Lustige Bilder & Videos @lustigebilderDE · 24,399 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 16 September 2026
Nasirea - Solfeggio Frequenzen @solfeggiofrequenzen · 21,078 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 September 2026
☉ 🐝 Ɲєuє єR𝕯є ♾️ คltєs WissєN ☀️ ☉ @neue_erde · 22,980 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 September 2026
Christina von Dreien Offiziell @christinavondreien · 26,833 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
Alles was du zum Leben brauchst @AlleswasduzumLebenbrauchst · 29,249 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 8 September 2026
maraswelt @maraswelt · 3 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 31 August 2026
Snicklink unzensiert @snicklink3000 · 32,936 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
Bewusst-Vegan-Froh 🍎 @bewusst_vegan_froh · 31,295 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 6 September 2026
Ich hab mal eben durchgezählt, ich hab sie tatsächlich nicht mehr alle 🤪 @nichtmehralle · 21,121 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 September 2026
Seelengut 🤍 @seelen_gut · 20,602 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 28 September 2026
Gute Nachrichten & Vibes @GuteNachrichtenNews · 43,014 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
Schwurblerhumor😁 @schwurblerhumor · 38,549 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
☠️ Giftige Wahrheit @GiftigeWahrheit · 34,420 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 4 September 2026
Timo G. 🌱 veganunterhaltsam @veganunterhaltsam · 52,962 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
FREQUENCY HUB 〰️, @Frequency_Hub · 34,986 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
WissenSchafft Freiheit @WissenSchafftFreiheit · 46,101 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
[ℂ𝕠𝕟𝕤𝕡𝕚𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪𝕟𝕖𝕨𝕤𝕣𝕠𝕠𝕞] @CNconspiracynewsroom · 26,480 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 September 2026
🏛TEMPEL DER AHNEN🏛 @tempelderahnen · 21,536 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 September 2026
Corona_Fakten @Corona_Fakten · 47,918 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026
Kanal Rechtsanwalt Dirk Sattelmaier @rasattelmaier · 38,425 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
🇨🇭QS24 | Schweizer Gesundheitsfernsehen - Eine Perspektive mehr Gesundheit & Persönlichkeitsentwicklung. @QS24_tv · 27,075 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 September 2026
Bleib Stark 🤜🤛 @bleibtstark · 25,546 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 September 2026
Herzkrieger @infoHerzkrieger · 25,594 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 74 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lachkanal” (@Lachkanal), 40,376 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lachkanal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
