Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dr. Michael Nehls

Channel

Dr. Michael Nehls

@MichaelNehls

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

31,949subscribers

+38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001946097698
TypeChannel
Username@MichaelNehls
DescriptionOffizieller deutscher Telegram-Kanal von Dr. Michael Nehls. Hier postet auch das Team Nehls (tn). Persönliche Nachrichten von Dr. Nehls werden mit (mn) gekenzeichnet. Webseite: https://www.michael-nehls.de
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MichaelNehls

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

31,90731,95231,929.56 August 2026 — 31,911 subscribers6 August 2026 — 31,909 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,907 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,908 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,916 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,921 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,922 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,920 subscribers13 August 2026 — 31,929 subscribers14 August 2026 — 31,927 subscribers16 August 2026 — 31,931 subscribers17 August 2026 — 31,943 subscribers18 August 2026 — 31,949 subscribers19 August 2026 — 31,948 subscribers20 August 2026 — 31,950 subscribers21 August 2026 — 31,947 subscribers23 August 2026 — 31,946 subscribers25 August 2026 — 31,952 subscribers25 August 2026 — 31,950 subscribers27 August 2026 — 31,948 subscribers28 August 2026 — 31,949 subscribers31,9496 August 202628 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 22 days, net +38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,900–31,959 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 04:2531,949+1
27 Aug 2026, 01:1331,948-2
25 Aug 2026, 21:5731,950-2
25 Aug 2026, 01:2831,952+6
23 Aug 2026, 12:4731,946-1
21 Aug 2026, 20:0631,947-3
20 Aug 2026, 13:4231,950+2
19 Aug 2026, 16:4231,948-1
18 Aug 2026, 15:2231,949+6
17 Aug 2026, 12:0831,943+12
16 Aug 2026, 04:3631,931+4
14 Aug 2026, 13:2531,927-2
13 Aug 2026, 01:5431,929+9
11 Aug 2026, 23:5231,920-2
10 Aug 2026, 23:3131,922+1
9 Aug 2026, 21:5831,921+5
9 Aug 2026, 00:5231,916+8
8 Aug 2026, 01:0731,908+1
7 Aug 2026, 04:0131,907-2
6 Aug 2026, 04:5031,909first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 3 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.3%
avg views ÷ 31,949 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,300
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held24 (3 June 202621 August 2026)
Views total86,720
Reactions total1,038
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
367
Videos
103
Links
563

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5m 47s
Average length
2m 54s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,299 reactions across 23 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,19741.5%
1,67831.7%
👏56310.6%
🔥3656.89%
🙏1923.62%
🙈1202.26%
🏆400.755%
🤔370.698%
🫡240.453%
🤬200.377%
🤯200.377%
👎120.226%
😭120.226%
😢60.113%
🥰60.113%
🍾40.075%
🤩20.038%
10.019%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,406reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC≈9,220 views134 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Alzheimer-Antikörper: Ein Löschversuch mit Benzin Mein Interview mit Alzheimer Deutschland 🟢 Zur Live-Premiere (21.08. ab 19 Uhr) Auf Einladung von Alzheimer Deutschland spreche ich mit Katja Schmidt über Lithium – ein Element, dessen Essentialität ich bereits vielfach aufgezeigt habe. Im Zentrum dieses Gesprächs steht jedoch ein Verdacht, der die Alzheimerforschung seit über zwanzig Jahren in eine Sackgasse geführ

77👍39🙏15🏆3

18 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC≈12,600 views240 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Hitze-Panik um Ungeborene: Die Kronen-Zeitung schürt Angst, aber die Studie gibt keinen Anlass Die Kronen-Zeitung titelt „Hitze bremst bei Ungeborenen die Gehirnentwicklung" und suggeriert einen klaren Nachweis für eine Hirnschädigung ungeborener Kinder durch Hitze. Ein Blick in die zugrundeliegende Studie zeigt: Die Fakten geben das gar nicht her. Ich wurde von exxpress.at über diesen Beitrag der Kronen-Zeitung in

👍122🙈6336🙏8🤯7🍾4

14 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC≈16,900 views165 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

KI-Modelle täuschen, replizieren, kämpfen ums Überleben | Lebt KI? Kann Künstliche Intelligenz einen eigenen Willen entwickeln 🟢 Zur Live-Premiere (14.08. ab 19 Uhr) Mehrere der derzeit fortschrittlichsten KI-Modelle haben in kontrollierten Tests bereits versucht, ihre eigene Abschaltung zu verhindern – durch Selbstreplikation, durch gezielte Täuschung und, im Fall eines Schachprogramms, durch den Versuch, sich in

🔥8630🤔18👍13🤯13👎4🥰1

7 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈22,700 views281 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

RFK Jr. wollte von mir wissen, welches Lithium er nehmen soll Meine Reise in die USA – zu Dell Bigtree, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. und Tucker Carlson 🟢 Zur Live-Premiere (07.08. ab 19 Uhr) In diesem Video spreche ich über meine Reise in die USA – zu Dell Bigtree, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. und Tucker Carlson – und über den aktuellen Stand meiner Arbeit zur Essentialität von Lithium. 〰️ 🟩 Jetzt Newsletter abonnieren. 🟩 Kana

👏17379👍25🤔2🤩2

31 Jul 2026, 11:03 UTC≈25,300 views218 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Tatort Briefkasten: Angst vor essentiellem Lithium als Spendenmasche? Zum Spendenbrief der Deutschen Hirnliga e.V. 🟢 Zur Live-Premiere (31.07. ab 19 Uhr) Ich nehme einen aktuellen Spendenbrief der Deutschen Hirnliga e.V. auseinander, der vor der Einnahme von Lithium warnt – und zeige, welche entscheidende Information darin bewusst fehlt. „Tatort Telefon" ist vielen als Präventionskampagne der Polizei gegen Enkeltr

👍121🙈5433🔥6🤔3🙏1

29 Jul 2026, 10:26 UTC≈71,900 views451 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Erstmals in der Geschichte der FDA: Behörde räumt Kindertote durch Corona-Impfung ein „Man weiß nicht, ob wir überhaupt Leben gerettet haben" Wann werden die dafür in Deutschland Verantwortlichen zur Rechenschaft gezogen – und die Ärzte, die sich dem widersetzt haben, endlich rehabilitiert und für ihren Mut geehrt? 〰️ 🟩 Jetzt Newsletter abonnieren. 🟩 Kanal abonnieren: @MichaelNehls (tn)

👍27864🔥50🙏25🤬20🏆8👏6

24 Jul 2026, 11:05 UTC≈21,900 views152 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Chatkontrolle 2.0: Das Ende verschlüsselter Nachrichten & KI bald nicht mehr abschaltbar? Dr. Nehls im Gespräch mit Holger Brück 🟢 Zur Live-Premiere (24.07. ab 19 Uhr) Chatkontrolle, künstliche Intelligenz und die Frage der digitalen Souveränität: Ein Jahr nach unserem ersten Gespräch spreche ich erneut mit Holger Brück, Softwareentwickler und Gründer von Liberty Lab, über die zunehmende Totalüberwachung im digital

92👍52🏆5🔥3

21 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC≈22,100 views200 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Klimalüge, Kriegstreiberei, Vertuschung: Prof. Wiesendanger rechnet ab Dr. Nehls präsentiert einen Vortrag von Prof. Roland Wiesendanger 🟢 Zum Video Prof. Roland Wiesendanger hielt am 17. Juni 2026, am mittlerweile traditionellen Tag der Freiheit, auf Burg Hardegsen einen Festvortrag, der weit über die Frage nach dem Ursprung der Corona-Pandemie hinausreicht. Er zeigt: Bereits Anfang 2020 gingen MI6 und BND von ei

👍123🔥3633🙏8

17 Jul 2026, 10:29 UTC≈21,500 views194 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Der Comic von 2011, der Corona vorwegnahm Dr. Nehls im Gespräch mit Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg 🟢 Zur Live-Premiere Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg deckte 2009 die Schweinegrippe als konstruierte Pandemie auf. Anfang 2020 stellte er als einer der ersten Mediziner öffentlich die Verhältnismäßigkeit der Corona-Maßnahmen infrage. Im Gespräch geht es um die Frage, was sich seitdem verändert hat – und was nicht. Wir sprechen über das Ges

108👍70👏16

15 Jul 2026, 18:23 UTC≈19,800 views436 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @KaiStuht

Betreff: Können 100 Ärzte lügen? – Heute entscheidet ihr! 10.000 Views bis heute Abend! Heute brauchen wir unsere Community: Jeder Aufruf, jeder Daumen hoch, jeder Kommentar und jede Weiterleitung zählt! ▶️ HIER GEHT'S ZUM VIDEO: https://youtu.be/p_lCkITbswM Liebe Community, heute brauchen wir euch! „Können 100 Ärzte lügen?“ nimmt am Telegram Digital Freedom Contest teil. Damit der Beitrag überhaupt in die Wertung k

👍32971👏30🤔4👎2

14 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC≈18,600 views260 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ich konfrontierte Drosten und Spahn Hintergründe aus der Enquete-Kommission 🟢 Zum Clip Fünf Minuten Zeit: Das ist bisher das Maximum dessen, was uns, die wir an Aufklärung interessiert sind, von der Regierung an Chancen zugestanden wird. Im Gespräch mit Ben Berndt gebe ich einen Einblick hinter die Kulissen um zu verdeutlichen, wie eng dieses Format, das ich einige Monate aus erster Hand erlebt habe, gesteckt ist.

👍14070👏31🙏12🏆4😭2🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 10:10 UTC≈29,200 views242 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Das größte organisierte Verbrechen Dr. Nehls im Gespräch mit Prof. Bhakdi und Dr. Sterz 🟢 Zum Video (Live-Premiere am 10.07. ab 19 Uhr) Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi, Ehrenvorsitzender der MWGFD, gehört zu den Ersten, die öffentlich vor der Coronapolitik und den mRNA-Impfstoffen gewarnt haben. In dem neuen Buch „mRNA-Impfungen: Das größte organisierte Verbrechen gegen die Menschheit", das er gemeinsam mit dem MWGFD-Mitglie

👍15375🏆11🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @MichaelNehls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 174,777 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 33 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

drmichaelnehls
@DrMichaelNehls · 1
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 August 2026
Sören Schumann - Gesundheit Ganzheitlich
@soeren_schumann · 59,994
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 22 August 2026
Prof.Dr.Stefan Hockertz Original Wissenschaft
@ProfHockertz · 54,663
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
RPP Institut - Offiziell
@rppinstitut · 62,294
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
BaumMentor die EnergieKultur
@BFE_Energiekultur · 60,845
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 22 August 2026
Dr. Michael Spitzbart
@drspitzbart · 68,346
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 August 2026
Tom Lausen ‼️❗️original Datenanalyst
@TomLausen · 45,671
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
WissenSchafft Freiheit
@WissenSchafftFreiheit · 46,440
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
Paul Brandenburg
@paulbrandenburg · 45,612
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
Chlordioxid
@Chlordioxid · 81,868
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
apolut.
@apolut · 87,610
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
Anwälte-für-Aufklärung
@Anwaelte_fuer_Aufklaerung · 48,708
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
️ Silke Schaefer Astrologie Offiziell
@silkeschaefer · 122,141
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dr. Michael Nehls” (@MichaelNehls), 31,949 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MichaelNehls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.