Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Blocktrainer Feed

Channel

Blocktrainer Feed

@BlocktrainerFeed

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,584subscribers

+30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001380450115
TypeChannel
Username@BlocktrainerFeed
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/BlocktrainerFeed

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,5494,5884,568.56 August 2026 — 4,554 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,554 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,549 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,552 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,553 subscribers18 August 2026 — 4,551 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,565 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,584 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,588 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,586 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,584 subscribers7 September 2026 — 4,585 subscribers11 September 2026 — 4,579 subscribers15 September 2026 — 4,584 subscribers4,5846 August 202615 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,543–4,594 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 15:004,584+5
11 Sept 2026, 22:004,579-6
7 Sept 2026, 05:144,585+1
2 Sept 2026, 08:234,584-2
30 Aug 2026, 11:344,586-2
27 Aug 2026, 18:244,588+4
25 Aug 2026, 03:574,584+19
21 Aug 2026, 19:084,565+14
18 Aug 2026, 15:024,551-2
15 Aug 2026, 20:584,553+1
12 Aug 2026, 02:064,552+3
9 Aug 2026, 10:514,549-5
6 Aug 2026, 18:484,554no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:464,554first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 30 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

537 reactions across 30 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍17232.0%
🔥6612.3%
6011.2%
🤡6011.2%
🍌315.77%
😁183.35%
🤣183.35%
😭152.79%
👌142.61%
🥴132.42%
😱91.68%
🥱91.68%
👀81.49%
71.30%
💩61.12%
🙏61.12%
🤮50.931%
😡40.745%
🎉30.559%
🖕30.559%
6 further kinds101.86%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 537 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC914 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Die Bitcoin-ETFs hatten nach dem Coldcard–Vorfall die beste Zuflusswoche seit April. 📊 BlackRock verkündete zugleich, dass die Schwelle für In-Kind-Transfers von 25 auf 1 Mio. $ gesenkt wurde. 👀 Das befeuerte Spekulationen über einen Inside-Job. 🧐 ⬇️ https://www.blocktrainer.de/blog/nach-coldcard-vorfall-bitcoin-etfs-verzeichnen-zufluesse-waehrend-blackrock-btc-gegen-ibit-tauschen-laesst

🖕3😁3🤮2👍1

11 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC≈1,100 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

TMTG, die Aktiengesellschaft von Donald Trump, hat ihre Bitcoin-Reserve auf 14.139 BTC vergrößert. 🛒📈 Dies geschah, während viele wegen On-Chain-Transfers über Verkäufe spekulierten. 👀 Trotzdem kann man nicht sagen, dass TMTG den Dip kauft. 🤔 ⬇️ https://www.blocktrainer.de/blog/trumps-aktiengesellschaft-hat-keine-bitcoin-verkauft-sondern-bestand-vergroessert

🤮3🔥2🍾1👍1💩1

10 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈1,220 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Das Unternehmen Strategy hat schon wieder Bitcoin verkauft. 📉 Dieses Mal flossen die Erlöse ausschließlich in $STRC-Rückkäufe. 👀 Gelingt es so, den $STRC-Kurs auf 100 US-Dollar zu bringen und somit wieder im großen Stil kaufen zu können? 🤔 ⬇️ https://www.blocktrainer.de/blog/strategy-hat-1690-bitcoin-verkauft-um-strc-zurueckzukaufen

🍌14😁2👍1

9 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC≈1,290 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Neue Folge des Wochenrückblicks! ⚡️🎙️ Tristan bespricht die verschobene Abstimmung beim CLARITY Act, den Erfolg der Haltefrist-Petition, Strategys jüngsten Bitcoin-Verkauf, die vermeintlichen Verkäufe von TMTG u.v.m. 👀 Jetzt hören! 🧡🎧 ⬇️ https://www.blocktrainer.de/wissen/blocktrainer-podcast#1786286977

👍3

9 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC≈1,320 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Gestern Nacht hat sich die BIP-110-Kette abgespalten – und es gibt einen klaren Gewinner. 👀 Was bedeutet der Chain-Split für Bitcoin? Ist jetzt eine weitere Unsicherheit aus dem Weg geräumt? 🤔 Heute um 20:15 Uhr live auf YouTube mit Roman Reher! 🎥 👉https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MInKgMJfSNU

😁6👍42🤡2

9 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC≈1,330 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

BIP-110 resultierte gestern in einer Spaltung des Bitcoin-Netzwerks. 💥 Auf der BIP-110-Kette gab es seither nur 2 Blöcke, während es auf der richtigen Blockchain 90 waren. 👀 Doch die BIP-110-Befürworter wollen noch nicht aufgeben. 🤔 ⬇️ https://www.blocktrainer.de/blog/bitcoin-netzwerk-spaltet-sich-bip-110-ist-gescheitert

👌11🍌10🤡42👍2

7 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈1,560 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Nach Coldcard und Boltz sorgt nun BTCPay-Server für die nächste Sicherheitswarnung im Bitcoin-Ökosystem. 🚨 Betreiber öffentlich erreichbarer Instanzen sollten ihre Systeme dringend aktualisieren/herunterfahren. ⚠️ Was bisher bekannt ist! ⬇️ https://www.blocktrainer.de/blog/btcpay-server-sicherheitswarnung

🥴10🤯32👍1

7 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC≈1,480 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Vor der Augustpause des Senats wird es zu keiner Abstimmung mehr beim CLARITY Act kommen. 🇺🇸❌ Im September soll das Thema aber wieder angegangen werden. 🧐 Ein neuer Vorschlag sieht derweil vor, dass Trump bestimmte Krypto-Investments verkauft. 📉👀 ⬇️ https://www.blocktrainer.de/blog/clarity-act-abstimmung-fuer-krypto-gesetz-verschoben

🤣11🤡6👍4

7 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC≈1,450 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ab Sonntagabend wieder verfügbar. shop.blocktrainer.de

🔥6🤣3👍1🙏1

Signed René | Blocktrainer.de

6 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,520 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Der Coldcard-Vorfall hat viele Bitcoiner dazu gebracht, ihr Self-Custody-Setup noch einmal zu überdenken. 🔐👀 Mit Multisig hätte ein einzelner kompromittierter Seed nicht zum Verlust der $BTC geführt. 🧐 Eine Schritt-für-Schritt-Anleitung! 🎓 ⬇️ https://www.blocktrainer.de/blog/bitcoin-selbstverwahrung-noch-sicherer-anleitung-fuer-multisig-wallet

👍5😁1

6 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC≈1,500 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Der CLARITY Act steht vor dem Aus! 🇺🇸❌ Bitcoin zeigt sich davon aber unbeeindruckt. Dasselbe gilt für den Coldcard-Vorfall sowie den BTC-Verkauf von Strategy. 🧐 Sind das alles gute Zeichen? 🤔 Heute um 21 Uhr live auf YouTube mit Roman Reher! 🎥 👉https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1MeFlLn5yY

7👍1🔥1🤡1🙏1

5 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈1,630 views63 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Jetzt auf YouTube! 🔥 Roman Reher war bei {ungeskriptet} by Ben zu Gast. 👀 👇 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DTCgjiBgV4

🔥48👍64🎉3👏1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @BlocktrainerFeed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Friedrich - Partner Offizieller News Kanal
@friedrichpartner · 29,203
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
KRYPTO NEWS DE
@KryptoKompassDe · 24,421
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
Bitbull Trading
@BK_btc_trading · 24,702
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 September 2026
Christian Bischoff
@christian_bischoff_mindset · 26,548
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Blocktrainer Feed” (@BlocktrainerFeed), 4,584 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BlocktrainerFeed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.