Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PRVCY.world

Channel

PRVCY.world

@prvcyworld

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,356subscribers

-52 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001175056829
TypeChannel
Username@prvcyworld
Created9 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/prvcyworld

Growth

8,3568,4088,3826 August 2026 — 8,408 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,408 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,399 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,393 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,384 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,377 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,372 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,369 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,360 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,356 subscribers6 August 20261 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 26 days, net -52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,348–8,416 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 12:258,356-4
29 Aug 2026, 08:578,360-9
25 Aug 2026, 23:528,369-3
22 Aug 2026, 23:438,372-5
19 Aug 2026, 23:128,377-7
16 Aug 2026, 18:158,384-9
13 Aug 2026, 08:148,393-6
10 Aug 2026, 00:438,399-9
6 Aug 2026, 10:188,408no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:578,408first reading

Engagement

64 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.6%
avg views ÷ 8,356 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,640
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.409%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 64 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 48 of 49 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held64 (29 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total80,301
Reactions total323
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

462 reactions across 62 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12727.5%
🔥11524.9%
👎7816.9%
👍5211.3%
😁357.58%
🤯337.14%
😱122.60%
👏81.73%
🥰20.433%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 462 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC469 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🟠⚡ Bitcoin Lightning im Cake Wallet: Speed ohne Privacy-Verlust 💸 Cake Wallet integriert das Bitcoin Lightning Network mit voller Selbstverwahrung, kombiniert mit Silent Payments, PayJoin und einer eigenen Spark-Implementierung für starke On-Chain- und Off-Chain-Privatsphäre. 🛡️ Lightning-Transaktionen blenden standardmäßig Spark-Adressen aus, veröffentlichen keine Daten in öffentlichen Explorern und erschweren Dri

1👍1

28 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC742 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🧠🎮 Laborgezüchtete Gehirnzellen spielen DOOM – was heißt das für unsere digitale Zukunft? 📡 Australische Forscher von Cortical Labs trainieren rund eine Million menschliche Neuronen in einer Petrischale, um DOOM in Echtzeit zu spielen. Die „Mini-Gehirne“ steuern Zielen, Bewegen und Schießen über elektrische Signale, zugänglich als remote „biologischer Computer“ CL1 für Entwickler weltweit. 🕵️‍♂️ Befürworter sehen

1🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈1,130 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🟠🛡️ US-Regierung gibt Oracle-KI Zugriff auf sensible Bundes- und Gesundheitsdaten 📡 Oracle darf mit generativer KI streng geschützte Bundes- und Geheimdienstsysteme betreiben, inklusive Medicare-, Medicaid- und ACA-Daten von über 150 Millionen US-Bürgern, kombiniert mit Musks Grok-KI. 🧬 Gesundheitsakten, Genomdaten, Versicherungsdaten und militärische Informationen sollen in einheitlichen Datenplattformen zusammeng

🔥2

27 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC≈1,010 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🟥🛡️ US-Regierung gibt Oracle & xAI Zugriff auf sensible Gesundheits- und Regierungsdaten 💾 Oracle erhält DISA IL5- und FedRAMP-High-Freigaben, um mit Generative-AI-Diensten hochsensible Regierungs-Workloads zu verarbeiten – inklusive Medicare-, Medicaid- und ACA-Daten von rund 150 Millionen Amerikanern. 🧬 Gemeinsam mit Musks Grok-Modellen laufen nun automatisierte Auswertung, Mustererkennung und Entscheidungsunters

5🔥2

26 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈1,130 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🛡️🤖 KI enttarnt anonyme Social-Media-Konten in Minuten 🧬 Eine Studie von ETH Zürich und Anthropic zeigt: Sprachmodelle können auf Basis normaler Posts pseudonyme Nutzer mit bis zu 68 Prozent Trefferquote identifizieren. 🎯 Aus Alltagstexten lesen KIs Interessen, Beruf, Ort und Schreibstil aus, verknüpfen sie mit Profilen auf anderen Plattformen und erleichtern Doxxing, Überwachung und personalisierte Betrugsangriffe

🔥1

26 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC≈1,150 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🟦🛡️ Weltbank pusht globale Digital-ID – Bezahlen wird zur Identitätsprüfung 💳 Die Weltbank verknüpft schnelle Zahlungssysteme mit nationalen Digital-IDs und „Payment Identity Credentials“, um Betrug zu reduzieren und Onboarding in Finanzdiensten zu vereinfachen. Identität soll direkt in jede Transaktion eingebettet werden, inklusive staatlicher Leistungen und Händlerzahlungen, mit verifizierbaren Nachweisen in QR-Co

🔥5

25 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈1,200 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🟠📡 Weltbank treibt verknüpfte digitale IDs und Instant-Payments für globale Tokenisierung voran 💳 Die Weltbank verknüpft in ihrem “ID Meets Instant”-Rahmen digitale Identitäten mit Schnellzahlungssystemen, um Betrug zu reduzieren, Onboarding zu beschleunigen und globale Interoperabilität zu schaffen. Verifizierbare Zahlungs-Identitätsnachweise (PIC) sollen in Alltagsapps, QR-Codes und Wallets eingebettet werden, ink

🔥8👎3

25 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC≈1,240 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🟦🛡️ Microsoft Copilot kapert Standard-Browser und bündelt mehr Surf-Daten 🌐 Microsoft leitet Links aus Copilot nun zwangsweise in ein Edge-basiertes Seitenpanel um – unabhängig von deinem eingestellten Standard-Browser. Damit landen Surfverläufe, Einstellungen und Interaktionen tiefer im Microsoft-Ökosystem. 🧠 Copilot darf mit Zustimmung Tabs auslesen, Inhalte zusammenfassen, Texte verfassen und Passwörter sowie Fo

🤯7🔥5👏1

24 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈1,320 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🛡️📡 Türkei sperrt Social-Media-Accounts im Iran-Krieg: Digitaler Informationskrieg eskaliert 🔥 In der Türkei wurden 41 Accounts auf X, Facebook und Instagram gesperrt, Inhalte von 75 weiteren Profilen gelöscht und strafrechtliche Ermittlungen eingeleitet. Begründet wird dies mit angeblicher „Desinformation“, psychologischer Kriegsführung und dem Schutz nationaler Sicherheit im Kontext der Angriffe auf den Iran. 🌐 A

4🔥1

24 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 28 August 2026

🛡️💻 Iranische Hacker platzieren Backdoors in kritischer US‑Infrastruktur ⚙️ Forscher melden, dass die iranisch unterstützte Gruppe Seedworm Backdoors in Netzwerken einer US‑Bank, eines Flughafens und eines Rüstungs-Softwarezulieferers installiert hat. Ziel ist weniger Datendiebstahl als strategischer Zugriff auf kritikinfrastrukturelle Systeme. 🌐 Über die Malware „Dindoor“ sichern sich Angreifer dauerhaften Zugan

23 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈1,410 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🛡️📡 FTC öffnet Hintertür für Überwachung von Kindern durch „Altersverifizierung“ 🔍 Die neue FTC-Politik erlaubt Apps, biometrische Daten, Ausweiskopien und Verhaltensprofile von Kindern unter dem Vorwand der Altersprüfung zu sammeln – ohne echte elterliche Kontrolle. Diese Daten können für Werbung, KI-Training und Profilbildung genutzt werden, während Versprechen zur „schnellen Löschung“ praktisch nicht überprüfbar

👎1

23 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC≈1,340 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🟦🛡️ Thailand öffnet Derivatemärkte für Krypto – mit strenger Überwachung 📊 Thailands Regierung lässt digitale Assets wie Bitcoin und sogar CO₂-Zertifikate als Basiswerte für Derivate zu. Ziel: moderner Kapitalmarkt und institutionelle Krypto-Investoren. 🔐 Gleichzeitig bleiben Krypto-Zahlungen verboten, Stablecoins stark limitiert und Touristen müssen beim Krypto-Tausch in Baht harte KYC- und Due-Diligence-Checks in

4👍3🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @prvcyworld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 208,913 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

GesundIstBesser
@gesundistbesser · 43,851
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 August 2026
Raik Garve
@Gesundheitslehrer · 40,512
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
Kai Brenner - Per Du mit dem Leben😃
@kaibrenner · 42,758
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
WAS WIRKLICH IST - ENDE DER TÄUSCHUNG
@waswirklichist · 59,857
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 August 2026
BaumMentor die EnergieKultur
@BFE_Energiekultur · 60,880
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 22 August 2026
Chlordioxid
@Chlordioxid · 81,820
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
Eva Herman Offiziell
@EvaHermanOffiziell · 189,710
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
HDK - HINTER DEN KULISSEN
@HDKTelegram · 42,330
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 29 August 2026
WissenSchafft Freiheit
@WissenSchafftFreiheit · 46,414
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
Gute Nachrichten & Vibes
@GuteNachrichtenNews · 44,098
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
LION Media TV
@LIONMediaTV · 104,885
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
LION Media
@LIONMediaNews · 134,564
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
reitschuster.de
@reitschusterde · 208,323
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PRVCY.world” (@prvcyworld), 8,356 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prvcyworld.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.