Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Beneder.Media⚖️

Channel

Beneder.Media⚖️

@geroldbeneder

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,292subscribers

-179 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001489987192
TypeChannel
Username@geroldbeneder
Created17 October 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/geroldbeneder

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

16,29216,47116,381.56 August 2026 — 16,471 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,471 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,466 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,457 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,453 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,451 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,446 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,442 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,434 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,426 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,424 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,417 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,412 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,409 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,408 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,394 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,384 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,378 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,372 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,360 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,358 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,354 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,348 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,339 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,333 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,329 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,328 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,322 subscribers5 September 2026 — 16,313 subscribers8 September 2026 — 16,300 subscribers11 September 2026 — 16,292 subscribers6 August 202611 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 36 days, net -179. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,265–16,498 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 03:1516,292-8
8 Sept 2026, 06:1916,300-13
5 Sept 2026, 02:0116,313-9
3 Sept 2026, 10:1216,322-6
2 Sept 2026, 01:4616,328-1
1 Sept 2026, 03:3616,329-4
31 Aug 2026, 00:4816,333-6
30 Aug 2026, 03:1616,339-9
29 Aug 2026, 01:0416,348-6
28 Aug 2026, 01:0216,354-4
27 Aug 2026, 00:4516,358-2
26 Aug 2026, 02:0316,360-12
25 Aug 2026, 00:1716,372-6
23 Aug 2026, 11:5416,378-6
22 Aug 2026, 00:5716,384-10
20 Aug 2026, 17:5216,394-14
19 Aug 2026, 18:2616,408-1
18 Aug 2026, 21:2816,409-3
17 Aug 2026, 23:0216,412-5
16 Aug 2026, 21:4616,417first reading

Engagement

233 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.1%
avg views ÷ 16,292 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,300
155 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
155
of 233 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 147 of 155 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held233 (4 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total357,041
Reactions total6,027
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 05m
Average length
3m 56s

Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,586 reactions across 218 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯2,49229.0%
👍2,33527.2%
👏1,57418.3%
1,04512.2%
🍾8439.82%
😁1752.04%
🤩1151.34%
😍70.082%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 219 of the 233 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,586 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 233 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 09:43 UTC118 viewsread 3 September 2026

https://mobil.versicherungsjournal.at/versicherungen-und-finanzen/kunden-beurteilten-17-rechtsschutzversicherer-25549.php?vc=newsletter&vk=25549&auto=yes

3 Sept 2026, 09:33 UTC190 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://exxpress.at/politik/kickl-kuendigt-orf-volksbegehren-an-keine-zwangsgebuehren/ Kommentar: Weg mit der Zwangsabgabe! Für eine Gesundschrumpfung des ORF! #orf

👍13

3 Sept 2026, 09:28 UTC204 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://report24.news/erzieherische-abreibung-antifa-mob-pruegelt-konservative-in-mannheim-krankenhausreif/

🍾2

3 Sept 2026, 09:07 UTC307 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://x.com/rusbotschaft/status/2095184531921711146?s=52&t=gcLZ-iG6aZyDRMEk39Pf_Q

💯3

3 Sept 2026, 07:28 UTC648 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://youtu.be/FB7-g-RrGuQ?si=apNMvkESFe3QKhth

👏20

3 Sept 2026, 06:28 UTC858 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://tkp.at/2026/09/03/mmr-impfung-2026-mehr-impftote-als-maserntote/

👍9💯3

2 Sept 2026, 20:51 UTC≈1,350 views38 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @oliverjanichVideo

💥Sensation: Oliver Janich gewinnt vor Verfassungsgericht! 📺 Komplette Sendung.

30👏8

2 Sept 2026, 20:48 UTC≈1,370 views75 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @rosenbuschVideo

Madrid am heutigen Abend. Schätzungen zwischen 50k und 150k: - „Sánchez dimisión“ — Sánchez Rücktritt - „Sánchez a prisión“ — Sánchez ins Gefängnis - „Pedro Sánchez, hijo de puta“ — Pedro Sánchez, Hu…sohn - „Ceuta, aguanta, España se levanta“ — Ceuta, halte durch, Spanien erhebt sich t.me/Rosenbusch

👍39👏267💯3

2 Sept 2026, 20:12 UTC≈1,440 views46 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://x.com/diemutaerzte/status/2095188986981453825?s=52&t=gcLZ-iG6aZyDRMEk39Pf_Q

👍3313

2 Sept 2026, 16:50 UTC≈1,790 views25 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZN8Y2rb3f/ Kommentar: Flug buchen macht richtig Spass?! #flugbuchen

🤩17💯7👏1

2 Sept 2026, 15:23 UTC≈1,750 views102 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @HaintzPhoto

Markus Haintz auf 𝕏: sic semper tyrannis Hiermit distanziere ich mich von der deutschen Bundesregierung und ihrer Maßnahmenpolitik gegen die Russische Föderation und die Interessen Deutschlands. Ohne Beweise wird Russland die Schuld an einem vermeintlichen Drohnenangriff auf dem Flughafen in Leipzig gegeben, der offenkundig, ob als false flag oder PsyOp, nur im Interesse der Ukraine liegen kann. Heute vor 87 Jahre

👏74💯157👍6

Showing the 12 most recent of 233 posts we hold for @geroldbeneder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

AUF1
@auf1tv · 273,848
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Beneder.Media⚖️” (@geroldbeneder), 16,292 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/geroldbeneder.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.