22 measurements spanning 23 days, net -174. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,170–23,396 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 09:13
23,196
-11
28 Aug 2026, 09:53
23,207
-8
27 Aug 2026, 08:32
23,215
+10
26 Aug 2026, 09:15
23,205
+1
25 Aug 2026, 07:07
23,204
-14
24 Aug 2026, 03:47
23,218
-13
22 Aug 2026, 10:22
23,231
-10
20 Aug 2026, 22:02
23,241
-21
19 Aug 2026, 19:12
23,262
+2
18 Aug 2026, 18:36
23,260
-6
17 Aug 2026, 15:25
23,266
-7
16 Aug 2026, 06:03
23,273
-16
14 Aug 2026, 18:17
23,289
-20
13 Aug 2026, 07:45
23,309
-2
12 Aug 2026, 04:42
23,311
+2
11 Aug 2026, 01:36
23,309
-8
9 Aug 2026, 22:31
23,317
-19
8 Aug 2026, 23:51
23,336
-6
7 Aug 2026, 23:42
23,342
-21
6 Aug 2026, 23:42
23,363
first reading
Engagement
96 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 23,196 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,340
96 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
96
of 96 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
96 (1 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
321,080
Reactions total
12,625
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,350
Videos
≈7,150
Links
≈1,130
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 36m
Average length
1m 23s
Measured directly from 69 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12,061 reactions across 91 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
2,764
22.9%
❤
1,375
11.4%
💯
1,303
10.8%
🙏
1,258
10.4%
👍
1,235
10.2%
👏
874
7.25%
😡
638
5.29%
🔥
561
4.65%
🤮
424
3.52%
🤡
359
2.98%
🤣
307
2.55%
⚡
208
1.72%
😁
197
1.63%
😢
144
1.19%
🤯
144
1.19%
😱
141
1.17%
👎
82
0.68%
🤔
24
0.199%
💔
10
0.083%
👌
8
0.066%
3 further kinds
5
0.041%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 96 of the 96 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,625reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 96 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @StormIsUponUsJM. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 96 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
TERRIFYING: During a TikTok live battle, an Algerian Muslim influencer asks a girl why she’s wearing a cross. She says she’s a Lebanese Christian.
He then becomes enraged and says he’d spit on her, and threatens to rape her and kill her, declaring that Christians deserve nothing but to be tortured in this world and the afterlife.
He has half a million followers and has illegally arrived in France via Spain just a f…
Bill Gates rejects the argument that "you don't want China to control the rollout" of AI
"Do you think China wants bio-terrorism? Do you think China wants cyber attacks?"
(The same week this interview was conducted, the DOJ took action to stop Chinese state-sponsored hackers who infiltrated the Federal Reserve, the U.S. Senate, NASA, and several other federal agencies)
Subscribe and share 👉 @StormIsUponUsJM
HOLY CRAP! BESSENT REPORTEDLY EYES TAX-EXEMPT STATUS OF SOROS, CAIR AND SPLC
Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent is reportedly gearing up to REVOKE the tax-exempt status of nonprofits including George Soros’ Open Society Foundation, CAIR and the SPLC, according to the NYP, with the operation potentially resulting in CIVIL PENALTIES. The move could target MULTIPLE leftist nonprofits accused of abusing their tax-exempt status…
Charlie Kirk said Anthony Fauci is a criminal responsible for hundreds of thousands of American deaths.
Was he right?
Look at the record.
Mandates and lockdowns that didn’t stop the virus.
Kids locked out of school.
Businesses destroyed.
Mask rules that changed every few weeks.
The lab-leak question treated like heresy.
Early treatments pushed aside.
Dissent treated like a crime.
One side still calls him a hero who…
Forwarded from @COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIESPhoto
Two people die of measles in Pennsylvania.
Media’s first move?
“BOTH WERE UNVACCINATED.”
That’s the headline.
That’s the only detail they wanted you to see.
Ages? Withheld.
Health history? Withheld.
Any other context? Withheld.
Just “unvaccinated” .. the perfect scare word to keep the fear machine running.
This is the same playbook every time. Lead with the narrative. Bury anything that softens the panic. Th…
I think there's two agendas in play with this Measles PsyOp
1) Attack RFK Jr. That one is obvious
2) A little more subtle - target the Amish communities, known for their incredibly low (or zero) vaccination rates.
Lancaster PA has a huge Amish population, this is where the alleged "two deaths from measles!" occurred (deaths which weren't caused by Measles, of course)
Another "outbreak of measles" is also occurrin…
You have to watch this. This man was issued a ticket by an AI Red light Camera and he wasn’t even in the state that issued him the ticket.
Subscribe and share 👉 @StormIsUponUsJM
MSM:
OMG.. the measles outbreak has killed 2 people, they were unvaccinated. First death in 35 years! RFK bad…
Reality:
They were 87-89 years old, and both had pre-existing health issues..
Subscribe and share 👉 @StormIsUponUsJM
Kacey Musgraves
American Grammy award winner, singer-songwriter…
Swinging from a pair of testicles..
If people haven’t figured out by now the purpose of these “stars”, the music industry, is to slowly but surely degrade the hearts and minds of each new generation, they never will.
Subscribe and share 👉 @StormIsUponUsJM
RFK JR:
President Trump met with leading regenerative farmers in the Oval Office to discuss transitioning away from glyphosate on U.S. Crops—The Pilot program drew a MASSIVE 60,000 Farmer and Ranch applicants
“We talked about how do we transition off of glyphosate and other chemicals toward a more sustainable kind of agriculture.”
Subscribe and share 👉 @StormIsUponUsJM
🚨Big Pharma is Terrified of This Man: Jim Humble Says “Chlorine Dioxide Cures 98% of All Diseases — Backed by Over 100,000 Patents!”
Did you know one simple, suppressed substance could destroy Big Pharma’s control over your health forever?
Legendary discoverer Jim Humble boldly declares:
“Chlorine Dioxide cures 98% of all diseases and is backed by more than 100K patents worldwide.”
Malaria gone in hours. Cancer un…
🙏75👍31❤22🤔2⚡1👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @StormIsUponUsJM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 45,661 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Joe M Storm Is Upon Us” (@StormIsUponUsJM), 23,196 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StormIsUponUsJM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
