Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Soulflix Media πŸ’£πŸ’₯

Channel

Soulflix Media πŸ’£πŸ’₯

@SoulflixMedia

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

5,530subscribers

-325 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001534752767
TypeChannel
Username@SoulflixMedia
Created18 January 2022 β€” measured β€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/SoulflixMedia

Topic

Politics & activism β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,5305,8555,692.57 August 2026 β€” 5,855 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 5,855 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 5,853 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 5,833 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 5,802 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 5,784 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 5,769 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 5,758 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 5,749 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 5,745 subscribers3 September 2026 β€” 5,735 subscribers8 September 2026 β€” 5,721 subscribers12 September 2026 β€” 5,707 subscribers16 September 2026 β€” 5,692 subscribers24 September 2026 β€” 5,671 subscribers4 October 2026 β€” 5,639 subscribers10 October 2026 β€” 5,619 subscribers14 October 2026 β€” 5,609 subscribers17 October 2026 β€” 5,601 subscribers21 October 2026 β€” 5,580 subscribers24 October 2026 β€” 5,567 subscribers26 October 2026 β€” 5,561 subscribers30 October 2026 β€” 5,553 subscribers2 November 2026 β€” 5,543 subscribers5 November 2026 β€” 5,530 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net -325. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,481–5,904 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 10:195,530-13
2 Nov 2026, 08:265,543-10
30 Oct 2026, 02:315,553-8
26 Oct 2026, 19:175,561-6
24 Oct 2026, 03:515,567-13
21 Oct 2026, 00:195,580-21
17 Oct 2026, 12:405,601-8
14 Oct 2026, 10:495,609-10
10 Oct 2026, 16:205,619-20
4 Oct 2026, 20:395,639-32
24 Sept 2026, 22:215,671-21
16 Sept 2026, 16:015,692-15
12 Sept 2026, 14:595,707-14
8 Sept 2026, 02:555,721-14
3 Sept 2026, 02:255,735-10
30 Aug 2026, 20:465,745-4
27 Aug 2026, 22:085,749-9
24 Aug 2026, 16:345,758-11
20 Aug 2026, 21:435,769-15
17 Aug 2026, 13:265,784first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 43 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 09m
Average length
3m 18s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀1947.5%
πŸ‘1332.5%
🀑410.0%
πŸ’―25.00%
πŸ”₯12.50%
πŸ™12.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 00:38 UTC13 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @bioclandestineVideo

Some on the Left are floating the idea of running Obama in 2028, if Trump somehow runs again. Don’t tempt us with a good time. Trump addressed this exact scenario in March 2025. Trump vs Obama 2028, in a secure election? Trump wins by a landslide, and the American People would be shown definitively, that Obama and the Dems’ support was kept afloat entirely on voter fraud and propaganda this whole time. Trump destro…

12 Aug 2026, 00:35 UTC13 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @devrijeomroepVideo

https://x.com/i/status/2087122583439212997 Moderna had already approved its Covid 3 years before 2020.

11 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC147 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @devrijeomroepVideo

What you should be aware and woken up about during your adult lifetime.

11 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC184 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

This guy is a fraud trying to slip in that Hitler stood up to Rothschild... Why did Hitler received for a fact 160 million dollar between 1930 - 1945 from a Florida bank????? From the handlers of the Rothschild family, from Prescott Sheldon bush??? (Grandfather George w bush) .... Because Hitler was family!

πŸ‘1

10 Aug 2026, 21:38 UTC191 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @devrijeomroep

https://odysee.com/@devrijeomroep/Ted-Gunderson--MK-Ultra-program Ted Gunderson on MK Ultra program - Provides evidence of satanic rituals involving children in the US and the rest of the world

πŸ”₯1

10 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC202 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @devrijeomroep

https://odysee.com/Cathy-O'Brien-Mark-Phillips--Vuk-Jovanovich Mark Phillips & Cathy O'Brien, CIA's MK-Ultra mind control program | VUK JOVANOVICH Documentary by Vuk Jovanovich where he interviews former MK Ultra sex slave Cathy O'brien and Mark Phillips about Mk Ultra Mind Control and the people behind and how far corruption reaches in the government. Revealing and reinforcing the many innuendos that have been circl…

πŸ™1

10 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC231 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dbow73Bp0Ms/?igsh=MXR4bnllM3NzdnlqZA== Hitler, the rogue asset of the banksters elite

9 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC238 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @devrijeomroepPhoto

https://mailchi.mp/bondoverheidszaken/worden-we-bestuurd-door-het-wef-rechtszaak-tegen-jetten1

9 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC225 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @TeamGratieGods

🚜πŸ”₯ ALLERLAATSTE WAKE-UP CALL β€” FRYSLΓ‚N, MOARN IS IT SA FIER! πŸ”₯🚜 MORGEN. MAANDAG 10 AUGUSTUS. Geen β€œvolgende keer”. Geen β€œeen ander gaat wel”. Geen β€œhet zal mijn bedrijf wel niet raken”. DIT IS DIE VOLGENDE KEER. De trekker staat op het erf. De sleutel ligt klaar. En morgen bepaal JIJ of je blijft zitten… of dat je opstaat voor onze agrarische sector. β€οΈπŸ€πŸ’™ FRYSLΓ‚N, NO MOATTE WY STEAN! Niet voor een organisatie.…

❀2

9 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC227 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @devrijeomroep

https://youtu.be/lzR6JYna_Ag?si=99x9_azyPYw4XIjA

8 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC248 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @projectcamelotKerry

https://bekahdayyy.substack.com/p/the-photo-album-ghislaine-maxwell?utm_source=multiple-personal-recommendations-email&utm_medium=email&triedRedirect=true

❀1

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @SoulflixMedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Klokkenluiders πŸ•ŠπŸ•Š voor vrijheid πŸ€œπŸ€› Nieuws
@klokkenluiders Β· 38,474
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 76 here β€” alongside 75 others β€” read 11 September 2026
Artsen Collectief
@artsencollectief Β· 19,701
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here β€” alongside 79 others β€” read 29 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œSoulflix Media πŸ’£πŸ’₯” (@SoulflixMedia), 5,530 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SoulflixMedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.