🚨🚨 New video out with Dr Mark Bailey & Dr Andy Kaufman The Poison Behind Your Prescription (w/ Dr. Mark Bailey) 👉 Watch on YouTube HERE
❤41👍22⚡6💯4🔥4
Signed Sam Bailey

Channel
@drsambaileyofficial
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,382subscribers
-120 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001551284937 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @drsambaileyofficial |
| Created | 17 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/drsambaileyofficial |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 16,382 | -7 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:17 | 16,389 | +1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 16,388 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:55 | 16,393 | -10 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 16,403 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 16,404 | -2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 16,406 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 16,409 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 16,416 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 16,420 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 16,424 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 16,426 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 16,427 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 16,428 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 16,433 | -9 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 16,442 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 16,449 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 16,452 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 16,455 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 16,460 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 2 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (2 December 2025 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 8,350 |
| Reactions total | 219 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,356 reactions across 22 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,568 | 47.9% | |
| 👍 | 1,230 | 23.0% | |
| 💯 | 501 | 9.35% | |
| 👏 | 214 | 4.00% | |
| 🔥 | 206 | 3.85% | |
| 😢 | 160 | 2.99% | |
| 😁 | 146 | 2.73% | |
| 🙏 | 74 | 1.38% | |
| ❤🔥 | 64 | 1.19% | |
| 🤯 | 64 | 1.19% | |
| ⚡ | 40 | 0.747% | |
| 🤔 | 38 | 0.709% | |
| 😱 | 32 | 0.597% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 0.205% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 0.093% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.056% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,356 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 2 December 2025 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨🚨 New video out with Dr Mark Bailey & Dr Andy Kaufman The Poison Behind Your Prescription (w/ Dr. Mark Bailey) 👉 Watch on YouTube HERE
❤41👍22⚡6💯4🔥4
Signed Sam Bailey
What if the most important question isn’t “Do you have CMV?” — but “What evidence do we actually have that CMV is causing the problem?” In this video, we go down the rabbit hole of CMV — from its origins in virology to modern PCR testing, pregnancy warnings, newborn diagnoses and the drugs used to treat it. What we found raises some uncomfortable questions about how a “virus” becomes the explanation for illness and…
❤78👍38💯16👏9🤔1
Signed Sam Bailey
🧀 **How to Make 2-Ingredient Mozzarella in 28 Minutes** Think making fresh mozzarella is complicated? This quick how-to video shows you how to make it at home using just **2 ingredients and 28 minutes**. 👉 Watch it here on YouTube
❤104👍39👏12🤔5🎉2🥰1
Signed Sam Bailey
What if the state was never meant to be the foundation of society — but became its ultimate authority? Discover how sovereignty gave the state the power to absorb almost every institution standing in its way. 👉 Watch the full video NOW
❤104👍52💯18🙏14❤🔥7🤔4
Signed Sam Bailey
The Biggest LIES About Cholesterol In this new video, Dr Sam Bailey examines the cholesterol narrative, statins, and the evidence behind one of medicine's most enduring beliefs. 🎥 Watch now HERE
❤160👍52👏21❤🔥8🤔2
Signed Sam Bailey
🧐 What if five common medical words don't mean what you've been led to believe? In this latest video, I explore the history and changing meanings of five familiar terms—and why understanding language is key to questioning modern medical narratives. ▶️ Watch now
❤142👍64🔥12⚡5🤔2🤯1
Signed Sam Bailey
🚨 NEW VIDEO: The Biggest Lies About Blood Pressure High blood pressure has been called the "silent killer" for decades—but where did this narrative come from? Dr. Sam Bailey examines the evidence behind hypertension guidelines, the expanding definition of "high" blood pressure, and whether the promised benefits of lifelong medication match the published data. 👉 Watch now and decide for yourself.
❤155👍66💯30🙏13⚡5👏2😱1
Signed Sam Bailey
🐄 The Dark Side of Foot-and-Mouth Disease We're told foot-and-mouth disease is a highly contagious viral threat requiring mass vaccination and the destruction of livestock. But when we examine the original 1898 experiments and the modern methods used to diagnose the disease, a very different picture emerges. 👉 Watch the full video here
💯114❤58👍48👏16🔥3🕊1🤔1
Signed Sam Bailey
🚨 Ebola is back in the headlines. We're told it's highly infectious, extremely deadly, and a constant global threat. So why has it never spread around the world as predicted? My latest video investigates the origins of the Ebola story, the testing claims behind it, and the latest fear campaign. 👉 Watch here
❤152💯53👍36🙏14🔥8😁8👏4⚡2
Signed Sam Bailey
Exciting and new. Come Aboard. We're expecting you! Another cruise ship “virus scare” is making headlines… but does the story actually make sense? In our latest video we break down the MV Hondius hantavirus claims, the media hype, and the bigger picture behind the fear campaign. 👉 Watch full video here
😁132👍67❤57👏27💯17❤🔥8🔥3⚡1
Signed Sam Bailey
The Truth About Antivirals 💊 If so-called “antivirals” exist… does that automatically prove viruses do? In this new video, we examine the claims behind antiviral drugs, the assumptions built into the virus model, and why many people may be accepting a narrative they’ve never fully questioned. 🔍 👉 Watch now and decide for yourself.
❤120👍59🔥21💯10🥰3⚡1
Signed Sam Bailey
A High Court was asked to provide proof of viruses and germ theory… and the response was not what you’d expect. Watch the full breakdown 👇 HERE
👍155❤82💯30🔥19❤🔥12👏8🙏5⚡3
Signed Sam Bailey
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @drsambaileyofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr. Sam Bailey” (@drsambaileyofficial), 16,382 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drsambaileyofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.