Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Iain Davis

Channel

Iain Davis

@iaindavis

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,612subscribers

+26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001572133975
TypeChannel
Username@iaindavis
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/iaindavis

Growth

1,5851,6121,598.56 August 2026 — 1,586 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,586 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,585 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,591 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,590 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,595 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,604 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,599 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,598 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,602 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,608 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,612 subscribers6 August 202614 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 39 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,581–1,616 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 03:371,612+4
10 Sept 2026, 18:151,608+6
5 Sept 2026, 11:371,602+4
29 Aug 2026, 19:241,598-1
26 Aug 2026, 14:581,599-5
24 Aug 2026, 00:151,604+9
20 Aug 2026, 03:411,595+5
16 Aug 2026, 21:361,590-1
13 Aug 2026, 08:481,591+6
6 Aug 2026, 20:001,585-1
6 Aug 2026, 07:331,586no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:351,586first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 29s
Average length
8m 29s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

228 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6227.2%
🔥6227.2%
4118.0%
👏2812.3%
🤣104.39%
🤔73.07%
💯62.63%
😁62.63%
🍾31.32%
🥰20.877%
👌10.439%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTC529 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Please check out my latest discussion with Richard D. Hall where we explore the Network State. https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=320&part=1&gen=99

👏9👍43🔥3

26 Jul 2026, 21:51 UTC654 viewsread 7 August 2026

Every time I post something on this channel I immediately get a porn bot response. I block them but any idea how I can block them all.

26 Jul 2026, 21:49 UTC579 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

If you go to Richplanet.net and get this from your Google, Android, Microsoft, etc., browser ignore it. Realise you are using a censorship and control system and find an alternative. No problems with Firefox, Brave, etc. You are in an information war. Don't believe the censors.

👍132

26 Jul 2026, 13:46 UTC783 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Please check out my discussion with Richard D. Hall. We cover some of the topics discussed in my latest book "The Technocratic Dark State." https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=319&part=1&gen=99

🔥10

23 Jul 2026, 00:05 UTC763 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @offguardianPhoto

The Multipolaristas’ China-Maxxing Let’s consider the arguments of those who advocate global governance, the people whom Hrvoje Morić identifies as the Multipolaristas. They are often engaged in China-maxxing and are, whether they know it or not, essentially serving as propagandists for the global oligarchy. Research conducted by analysts working for the South China Morning Post (SCMP)—an English-speaking, Western-

🔥121👍1

21 Jul 2026, 12:22 UTC835 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣10😁6💯5🍾3

21 Jul 2026, 12:22 UTC818 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Well, here's to the continuity of government in the UK.

👍3

21 Jul 2026, 06:35 UTC≈1,090 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/a-home-for-lewis

12🥰2

19 Jul 2026, 17:33 UTC≈1,180 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://corbettreport.substack.com/p/the-stunning-collapse-of-the-climate

👍14👌1

16 Jul 2026, 15:57 UTC782 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @unlimitedhangout

NEW from Iain Davis In Part 1, Iain Davis defined the Praxians, considered their openly stated control of the Trump administration, and examined their extensive partnerships with the Israeli defence technology sector. In Part 2, Davis considered global events through the lens of State Crimes Against Democracy (SCADs) and noted how civil-military fusion and hybrid war, combined with SCADs, are socially engineering a

6👍3🔥1

16 Jul 2026, 15:27 UTC≈1,420 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

In my latest article for Whitney Webb's Unlimited Hangout I delve into how global forces have aligned behind the Silicon Valley-adjacent "Praxian" oligarchs' vision of a Network State Empire in the march toward a Multipolar World Order that both the ostensibly "anti-globalist" Praxians and the overtly "globalist" UN and its allies are working to accelerate. (67 minute read) https://unlimitedhangout.com/2026/07/inves

🔥101👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iaindavis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel
@DrMikeYeadonsolochannel · 26,026
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Iain Davis” (@iaindavis), 1,612 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iaindavis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.