Operation Gladio 2.0...they literally can't come up with new PSYOPS. https://t.me/disclosetv/21572

Channel
Open Minds Inc. 💡
@OpenMindsInc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
612subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001319555792 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OpenMindsInc |
| Created | 31 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OpenMindsInc |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 612 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 609 | +7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 602 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 600 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 600 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 11 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
20 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 11 | 55.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 10.0% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 10.0% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 10.0% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 10.0% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
BAM
🇬🇧🏳️🌈 UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer: “Proud that we've got the gayest parliament. I don't think just at all times anywhere in the world, I don't think there's any parliament that is gayer than this parliament” @Megatron_ron
🤣1
Is it ironic, even hilarious perhaps, to now watch globalist shills like Tony Bliar backtracking on the climate scam now they realise they can't power their data centres with windmills and sunshine. It is certainly irksome, after years of being called a "climate denier," to hear leading climate change alarmists, like Bliar, use many of the same arguments put by those of us he personally vilified as "climate deniers"…
🔥5
💥💥💥 IMF and World Bank are 'designed to keep developing countries poor' — Economist Richard Werner goes further on the institutions themselves: the IMF/World Bank system was built to replicate British colonial extraction, not enable development. 🔶 The system functions to keep developing nations as cheap exporters of raw materials — structurally, not accidentally 🔶 Werner describes it as "the modern version of the …
💯1
Best of OffG: A look at the “97.4% of climate scientists” meme Originally published February 2017, one of our earliest Climate Change articles. It tackles not only the broader narrative, but specifically one of most oft-quoted and misleading statistics on the internet. On 4 February, 2017 the Daily Mail published an article entitled: “World Leaders Duped by Manipulated Global Warming Data”. “…The Mail on Sunday to…
Photo, posted without a caption
JUST IN - Google authorizes the U.S. War Department to use AI tools in classified environments, accelerating the Pentagon’s push to embed AI in its operations, following OpenAI and xAI signing similar agreements in recent weeks. Read here: https://www.disclose.tv/id/eoxtjwrspf/ @disclosetv
Palantir, a CIA front company, now has its tentacles in the food supply, our healthcare data, our growing autonomous weapons industry, the military, the entire US intelligence community, border patrol, Space Force and so on. Seemingly, Palantir is soon to become the testrun for Yarvins "sov-corp", a privatized version of govt that replaces the existing govt and is ruled by a CEO dictator. That is, unless we do somet…
NYT: Just Steal https://archive.is/W94ZG
👍2
If anyone has read my book this will make you laugh, you couldn't make this shit up. Check out Trumps new Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Established by Executive Order, no less. Co-chairs: David Sacks and Michael Kratsios The Neoreactionary accelerationists are: Marc Andreessen Sergey Brin Safra Catz Michael Dell Jacob DeWitte Fred Ehrsam Larry Ellison David Friedberg Jensen Huang John Martinis Bob…
🤯1
https://youtu.be/y3SDWwAwNY0?si=3XtS0ucbYyS674yc
🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @OpenMindsInc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@OrwellianDystopia · 14,3014 postsIain Davis
@iaindavis · 1,6022 postsDisclose.tv
@disclosetv · 324,7531 postGeopolitics Prime | Iran & Ukraine News Updates
@geopolitics_prime · 293,1761 postGeopolitics & Empire
@GeopoliticsAndEmpire · 12,6221 post𝕀𝕟 𝕄𝕒𝕘𝕟𝕒 𝔼𝕩𝕔𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠
@inmagnaexcitatio · 19,4871 postJay Dyer
@jayd0007 · 4,4621 postMarion Koopmans Museum
@marionkoopmansmuseum · 3771 postMegatron
@megatron_ron · 76,2541 postOffGuardian (official)
@offguardian · 8,6491 postmosh.media
@photoparadigm · 851 postProphecy Recon ⚔️ Joe Hawkins
@prophecyrecon · 8671 postThe Daily Psyop
@PsyopDaily · 3,3841 postUnlimited Hangout
@unlimitedhangout · 13,8161 postZeee Media 🎙
@zeeemedia · 54,9311 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@OpenMindsInc named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Open Minds Inc. 💡” (@OpenMindsInc), 612 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OpenMindsInc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.