Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OSINT

Channel

OSINT

@OSINT_1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

600subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001532078724
TypeChannel
Username@OSINT_1
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/OSINT_1

Growth

587600593.57 August 2026 — 591 subscribers7 August 2026 — 591 subscribers7 August 2026 — 592 subscribers15 August 2026 — 587 subscribers23 August 2026 — 592 subscribers31 August 2026 — 600 subscribers7 August 202631 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 24 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 585–602 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 01:42600+8
23 Aug 2026, 07:25592+5
15 Aug 2026, 13:04587-5
7 Aug 2026, 19:20592+1
7 Aug 2026, 10:48591no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:35591first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🖕525.0%
🔥420.0%
🤯420.0%
🤬315.0%
👎210.0%
👏210.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC37 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://thedreydossier.substack.com/p/we-need-to-talk-about-tucker

Signed John Kolak

7 Aug 2026, 01:10 UTC55 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://substack.com/@anonymouslyenlightening/note/c-301567342?utm_source=notes-share-action&r=6g2my7

Signed Caffeinated Woman

7 Aug 2026, 01:10 UTC46 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://cyberlifecoach.substack.com/p/ices-reactivated-graphite-spyware?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web

Signed Caffeinated Woman

7 Aug 2026, 00:27 UTC37 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @australiaforfreedomVideo

🇮🇱🎪👀✍️💯 Facts about Israel! Join the channel ⬇️ https://t.me/australiaforfreedom

👏2

Signed Caffeinated Woman

7 Aug 2026, 00:25 UTC35 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @australiaforfreedomVideo

🇺🇸🎪 15 minute city being built in Texas. Join the channel ⬇️ https://t.me/australiaforfreedom

🤯1

Signed Caffeinated Woman

6 Aug 2026, 22:28 UTC37 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @GeopoliticsAndEmpire

Durán believes, “Silicon Valley has gone fascist because they have adopted an extreme ideology of tech supremacy.” While Maga promises a return to a mythical glorious past, he says, the “technofascists” are promising a mythical glorious future: “We’re going to be in the stars. We’re going to be in space. And all we need is to get rid of anybody who stands in our way as we seek to accelerate technology toward this spe

🔥1

Signed Caffeinated Woman

6 Aug 2026, 22:24 UTC54 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/jryvzPU40Go?si=5FgLAi4v6BFDk6NR

Signed Caffeinated Woman

6 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC42 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIESVideo

Pfizer defends itself in court by saying, "We never said it was safe and effective." Because Pfizer never said it was safe and effective. Moderna defends itself in court by saying, "We never said it was safe and effective." Because they never said it was safe and effective. The only people that said it was safe and effective was the government and the media. ✔️ We invite all Members of Parliament and Senators—reg

🔥1

Signed Caffeinated Woman

6 Aug 2026, 22:20 UTC62 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥1

Signed LongShot000

6 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC53 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://rumble.com/v7dt6r0-john-solomon-the-single-greatest-intrusion-on-our-elections-over-the-last-s.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_ucp_a

Signed LongShot000

6 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC39 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @disclosetvPhoto

JUST IN - For the first time, AI has designed complete viral genomes, producing 16 functional viruses that infect bacteria and "pose no threat to people." The team reportedly excluded viruses capable of infecting complex organisms from its training data and worked in a "secure laboratory." Read here: https://www.disclose.tv/id/jiweyr71fi/ @disclosetv

🤯2

Signed LongShot000

6 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC63 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://joehoft.com/exclusive-burger-king-governors-office-curious-rise-katie/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=exclusive-burger-king-governors-office-curious-rise-katie

Signed LongShot000

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OSINT_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OSINT” (@OSINT_1), 600 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OSINT_1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.