Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 92 days, net -71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,494–13,604 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 02:20
13,508
+1
5 Nov 2026, 00:46
13,507
-5
4 Nov 2026, 00:08
13,512
-5
2 Nov 2026, 22:21
13,517
-5
2 Nov 2026, 00:19
13,522
-6
1 Nov 2026, 01:28
13,528
+2
31 Oct 2026, 00:07
13,526
-6
30 Oct 2026, 00:31
13,532
-5
28 Oct 2026, 20:58
13,537
-3
27 Oct 2026, 16:56
13,540
-6
26 Oct 2026, 17:30
13,546
-1
25 Oct 2026, 16:19
13,547
-2
24 Oct 2026, 15:31
13,549
-1
23 Oct 2026, 18:38
13,550
-8
22 Oct 2026, 17:05
13,558
-2
21 Oct 2026, 14:01
13,560
-3
20 Oct 2026, 13:06
13,563
+2
19 Oct 2026, 10:35
13,561
-3
18 Oct 2026, 08:10
13,564
-10
17 Oct 2026, 07:46
13,574
first reading
Engagement
150 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.0%
avg views ÷ 13,508 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,160
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 150 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 34 of 35 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
150 (31 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
75,452
Reactions total
860
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 07:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈9,540
Videos
≈237
Links
≈4,890
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 28s
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,371 reactions across 142 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,040
46.7%
🔥
1,254
28.7%
😁
876
20.0%
👎
201
4.60%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 149 of the 150 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,622 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 150 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
253
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 150 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
250
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @usertrader3. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 150 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 35 posts held from the last 30 days (8.57%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
диспозиция
#Насдак бах-бах.
Вернее #SOXX, который полупроводники. Но по итогу досталось всему рынку.
-3 трлн. долларов падение капитализации. А Трамп писал про рост рынка накануне - лучше бы молчал.
Печалька. Выход вниз. Фьючерс на Насдак еще может чуток опуститься к зоне 26000 пунктов. #SOXX имеет ход до 120 долларов ( закрытие вчера на 131,9 ).
#Мосбиржа - #НЕФТЬ выросла, нефтянка закрыла гэп, шортокрыл продолжаю…
Bankster - канал одних из лучших трейдеров в сфере.
Авторы ежедневно проводят прямые эфиры, публикуют самые важные новости и события фондового рынка РФ, точки входа и выхода, а также аналитику.
Для участников сообщества доступны уникальные преимущества:
• Авторские индикаторы в трейдинг вью
• Ежедневные точки входа по авторской стратегии в какао - газу - валюте
• Регулярные бесплатные обучения для новичков в мире …
#РУБЛЬ 👉 покупки валюты Минфином ожидаемо выросли.
Суммарно покупка валюты ( юани и золото ) вырастут с 12,1 млрд. рублей до 15 млрд. рублей в день.
+24%.
Но это уже все в цене 🤷♂️.
Скажите спасибо, что валюта сильно не упала.
Подписаться на @userTrader3
диспозиция
Главное для нас это падение #НЕФТЬ ниже 100 долларов.
И вывод Вэнса про поражение Республиканцев 👉 "во всем виноваты евреи" 😁.
Автор думает и публично считает, что политика Трампа и К это не ошибки курса, а сознательный выбор части элиты США. Иран оказался твердым орешком - слишком твердым. Цена нефти это отражение недостатка дешевой энергии в мире. Это глобальный вызов для США, экзистенциальная угроза. О…
Про выборы в США.
Polymarket реально рулит повесткой.
Демократы убедительно победили, но победа она с привкусом проблем, возможно Республиканцы и не стремились взять всю полноту власти в стране, на фоне проблем бюджета.
Главное для нас 👉 драгметаллам сильно понравилась победа демократов 😁.
#Золото выше 4000 долларов. Это успех 👍.
Подписаться на @userTrader3
Праздник!
Весьма странный, на фоне централизации власти в России. События 1612 года это о демократии народа и о том, что народ в России, русский человек может решить проблемы государства сам, без царя, помазанника Божьего. Без всякого блокчейна и подсчёта голосов избрать ту власть, которая решит проблемы страны.
Праздник именно об этом и тут виден явный диссонанс с текущим состоянием, прежде всего закрытостью власт…
2026 год не простит ошибок тем, кто покупает биткоин и эфир
Пока новички скупают BTC и ждут, когда он вырастет на 15-20%, профи ищут так называемые «асимметричные сделки». Это когда ты рискуешь $100, чтобы забрать $3000-$5000.
В тяжелых монетах из ТОП-10 такой математики давно нет. Зато на альтах с небольшой капитализацией она работает каждый день. Именно поэтому стоит читать канал Взгляд Фролова.
Автор находит мо…
👎10😁4
Showing the 12 most recent of 150 posts we hold for @usertrader3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 8 posts on @usertrader3 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
48 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@usertrader3 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rian_ru named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 6 November 2026
@usertrade3 named in 6 posts, 30 August 2026 – 2 September 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Роман Дмитриев. Инвестиции и трейдинг ProfitKing @profitking · 67,677 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
MOEX-info @moex_info · 20,057 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 September 2026
ЗЛОЙ ФИНАНСИСТ 😡 @finpizdec · 54,364 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
Angry Bonds @angrybonds · 24,272 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
ФИНАНСОВЫЕ ДУМКИ @MarketDumki · 52,286 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
Тимофей Мартынов @martynovtim · 36,611 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
InveStory @investorylife · 19,811 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 1 October 2026
XELIUS TRADING @XeliusGroupOfficial · 20,014 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 October 2026
Инвестиции сегодня, Трейдинг, Экономика, Акции - ProfitGate. Кречетов. @ProfitGate · 78,402 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
🏡 Уютный | Инвестиции @cozytrade · 99,658 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
Аналитика Мосбиржи @analytics_moex · 34,149 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 2 September 2026
Манька Аблигация @marythebond · 45,735 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
Биржевик | Сырьевой @oilgasofficial1 · 26,418 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
Сергей Пирогов @PirogovLive · 27,564 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Залим Сохов - ON FLEEK investing @onfleek419 · 36,772 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
Stock News @Stock_News100 · 18,729 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 October 2026
Профита нет. А если найду? @profitanet · 201,730 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
Ленивый инвестор @smfanton · 51,673 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“usertrader” (@usertrader3), 13,508 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/usertrader3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.