Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мятежный капитализм

Channel

Мятежный капитализм

@moi_misli_vslukh

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,876subscribers

+615 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001982467704
TypeChannel
Username@moi_misli_vslukh
DescriptionDisclaimer: Все, что написано в данном канале - это мнение и рассуждения, а не рекомендации.
Created15 April 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/moi_misli_vslukh

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,24912,87612,562.56 August 2026 — 12,261 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,261 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,259 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,250 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,249 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,266 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,273 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,309 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,336 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,342 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,513 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,619 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,642 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,651 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,703 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,715 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,754 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,786 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,797 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,794 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,798 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,803 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,815 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,813 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,822 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,825 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,830 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,835 subscribers7 September 2026 — 12,821 subscribers10 September 2026 — 12,859 subscribers12 September 2026 — 12,875 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,867 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,872 subscribers30 September 2026 — 12,864 subscribers5 October 2026 — 12,854 subscribers10 October 2026 — 12,856 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,870 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,872 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,875 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,871 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,870 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,872 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,870 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,869 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,863 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,856 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,854 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,852 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,871 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,866 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,868 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,861 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,859 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,868 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,865 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,872 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,871 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,869 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,872 subscribers6 November 2026 — 12,876 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net +615. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,155–12,970 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 10:3712,876+4
5 Nov 2026, 13:0712,872+3
4 Nov 2026, 11:5612,869-2
3 Nov 2026, 12:4812,871-1
2 Nov 2026, 12:0712,872+7
1 Nov 2026, 15:2912,865-3
31 Oct 2026, 17:1012,868+9
30 Oct 2026, 20:2912,859-2
29 Oct 2026, 17:5112,861-7
28 Oct 2026, 15:4712,868+2
27 Oct 2026, 12:1412,866-5
26 Oct 2026, 11:1412,871+19
25 Oct 2026, 10:2712,852-2
24 Oct 2026, 07:2012,854-2
23 Oct 2026, 10:1912,856-7
22 Oct 2026, 11:5712,863-6
21 Oct 2026, 08:3712,869-1
20 Oct 2026, 08:1012,870-2
19 Oct 2026, 04:5712,872+2
18 Oct 2026, 03:2812,870first reading

Engagement

152 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.9%
avg views ÷ 12,876 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,600
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 152 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held152 (29 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total118,690
Reactions total1,840
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 19:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,950
Videos
≈95
Links
≈4,460

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

10,010 reactions across 149 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,77537.7%
💯1,73917.4%
❤1,68016.8%
🔥1,28312.8%
🤔5185.17%
😁4344.34%
👏3843.84%
🤯870.869%
😱790.789%
👌270.27%
🥰40.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 152 of the 152 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,256 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 152 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 152 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @moi_misli_vslukh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 152 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 33 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 23:38 UTC≈2,940 views43 reactionsread 6 November 2026

CNBC: демократы в Сенате готовятся расследовать связи банка JPMorgan с Джеффри Эпштейном К вопросу «о». Смешались вместе конелюди. Визуально выглядит как огонь по своим. Причем по своим в широком смысле. Даже несмотря на то, что Даймон вроде как республиканец по политическим убеждения. В данном случае речь не про него лично, а про целый банк. Ну и интересно то, что демы лихо перехватили инструмент им.Эпштейна у Тра…

👍27💯9😱5❤1😁1

5 Nov 2026, 23:35 UTC≈2,890 views51 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Только вчера все было позитивно, как на тебе - рыночек полетел в пропасть. Начали ходить слухи, что демократы внезапно против ИИ и будут мешать строить ЦОДы. Тут уж, судя по всему, настало время, когда любой повод на негатив будет отыгрываться. В интересный период вступаем. Особенно интересен период ближайших трех недель до конца ноября. @moi_misli_vslukh

👍29💯13🔥7❤2

4 Nov 2026, 21:41 UTC≈3,830 views47 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Лишнее доказательство того, что золото сейчас торгуется не как резервный, а как спекулятивный актив. Хотя, если вспомнить все, что мы говорили о поведении цены золота в моменты финансовых кризисов, в этой спекуляции есть и своя логика. Потому что как только происходит какой-нибудь лихой обвал, резервные активы и сливают, чтобы закрыть дырки. Другое дело, что избрание демократов скорее не отдаляет, а приближает этот…

👍24💯15🔥5❤3

4 Nov 2026, 21:38 UTC≈3,330 views42 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Интересно, что теперь Трамп скажет про 5000 долларов каждому гражданину США. Вынесет в конгресс и сенат предложение денежки потратить, а демократы проголосуют против? В принципе, для этого, видимо и задумывалось такое обещание. @moi_misli_vslukh

👍19😁13💯10

4 Nov 2026, 16:44 UTC≈3,410 views57 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

С инфляцией в еврозоне все хорошо. Она растет. Причем примерно с начала года и более-менее в корелляции с ценой на энергоносители, удобрения и пр. Причем объективно - этот рост издержек еще не рассосался по экономике. Причем парадокс по тем же удобрениям в том, что основная причина роста цен на с/х продукцию - это не только рост себестоимости, но и попытка сократить прибыль европейскими колхозниками при спаде урожай…

💯44👍8❤5

4 Nov 2026, 15:23 UTC≈3,320 views46 reactionsread 6 November 2026

WSJ: США добиваются возобновления поставок российского газа в Европу по трубопроводам через Украину. По информации издания, продажи возьмут на себя США в качестве посредника - и хотят таким образом одновременно заработать, снизить цены на энергию в Европе и дать России экономический стимул к переговорам. В принципе, западные СМИ начали писать о том, о чем отечественные «конспирологи» говорили еще три года назад. П…

💯27👍7🤔7❤5

4 Nov 2026, 10:41 UTC≈3,420 views110 reactionsread 6 November 2026

В США впервые избрали сенатора-мусульманина и темнокожую женщину губернатором Демократ Абдул Эль-Сайед победил на выборах в Мичигане и станет первым мусульманином в Сенате США. А демократ Кейша Лэнс Боттомс возглавит Джорджию, став первой темнокожей женщиной на посту губернатора в истории страны. Ранее Трамп заявлял, что в случае победы Эль-Сайеда Конгрессу придётся купить специальный металлодетектор, чтобы "не доп…

💯81🔥13👍11❤4😁1

4 Nov 2026, 10:30 UTC≈3,220 views51 reactionsread 6 November 2026

А ведь демократы, с точки зрения теории Власти, сделали серьёзную ошибку. Если, конечно, по итогам выборов они реально одержат разгромную победу. Суть в том, что нельзя брать на себя публичную ответственность, не имея политического проекта! Вспомним II съезд Советов летом 1917 года, когда все левые партии отказывались брать власть, поскольку не представляли, что делать. И только Ленин, у которого был политический пр…

👍28🔥13💯8❤2

4 Nov 2026, 10:00 UTC≈3,040 views45 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Обычно тех, кто плохо делает свою работу, увольняют. Здесь же налицо многолетняя аналитическая некомпетентность на уровне высшего экспертного органа. Или это по логике прогнозы у нас правильные, просто бизнес и правительство нам рулить не дает и выполнять прогнозы мешает? @moi_misli_vslukh

💯23👏13👍3🤔3😁3

4 Nov 2026, 07:05 UTC≈3,170 views105 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Ленина, если подумать, зря переставили с полки экономической литературы в отдел советского антиквариата. Чем дольше смотрю на происходящее, тем меньше вижу «мир внезапно сошел с ума». В очередной раз убеждаясь, что прежний раздел мира перестал устраивать тех, кто способен его пересмотреть. У Ленина есть замечательная фраза - «Капиталисты делят мир не по своей особой злобности». Дальше - про концентрацию капитала, пр…

👍57❤18💯18🤔7😁3👏1🤯1

3 Nov 2026, 22:08 UTC≈3,270 views87 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Народный банк Китая снизит ставку по программе рефинансирования для обратного выкупа акций с 1,25% до 1% и сделает этот механизм постоянным, сообщает Bloomberg. В рамках расширения мер поддержки фондового рынка регулятор также увеличит число финансовых организаций, допущенных к операциям по своп-линиям, и снизит для них комиссии. По данным китайского ЦБ, на данный момент уже заключены контракты на предоставление кред…

💯54🤔18👍9❤5😁1

3 Nov 2026, 21:47 UTC≈3,110 views67 reactionsread 6 November 2026

(НАЧАЛО ВЫШЕ) Собственно говоря, прогноз из этой логики вырисовывается такой. Вместо общей обороны получаем конкурирующие национальные перевооружения. Вместо общей кассы - борьбу за субсидии. Вместо единой политики - отдельные договоренности с внешними силами. Более сильный требует больше влияния. Более слабый ищет, кем его уравновесить. Внешние игроки охотно предлагают помощь - каждый со своими условиями. И крайня…

👍41🔥17🤔8❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 152 posts we hold for @moi_misli_vslukh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 46 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Графономика
@topinfographic · 20,109
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 September 2026
Angry Bonds
@angrybonds · 24,256
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
Инфляционный шок!
@inflation_shock · 39,769
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
Кримсон Дайджест
@crimsondigest · 141,176
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Хулиномика
@hoolinomics · 98,653
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
Spydell_finance
@spydell_finance · 131,053
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Капитал
@sgcapital · 19,124
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 October 2026
Русский экономизм
@russianeconomism · 76,910
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
Грокс
@groks · 42,496
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
Брошка Наебуллиной
@naebrosh · 41,654
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 September 2026
Proeconomics
@proeconomics · 68,730
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
Global Economics
@global_economics · 25,239
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 September 2026
Evening Prophet
@eveningprophet · 19,083
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 5 October 2026
ФИНАНСОВЫЕ ДУМКИ
@MarketDumki · 52,280
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
Математик в Лондоне
@mathbotan · 26,380
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 September 2026
Артем Тузов. Финансы и инвестиции
@tuzov_invest · 27,732
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Алексей Кричевский | Экономизм
@economismrussia · 19,607
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 October 2026
Алексей Бобровский
@alexbobrowski · 36,979
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
Простая экономика
@prostoecon · 302,789
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
Politeconomics
@politeconomics · 20,973
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 September 2026
RationalAnswer | Павел Комаровский
@RationalAnswer · 109,064
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 August 2026
Манька Аблигация
@marythebond · 45,735
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
Digital Доктор
@tlgdoc · 29,158
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026
Деньги и песец
@moneyandpolarfox · 50,930
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 42 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мятежный капитализм” (@moi_misli_vslukh), 12,876 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moi_misli_vslukh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.