Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Экономика долгого времени

Channel

Экономика долгого времени

@longviewecon

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,159subscribers

-206 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001642906088
TypeChannel
Username@longviewecon
Created6 October 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/longviewecon

Growth

16,15916,36516,2626 August 2026 — 16,365 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,365 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,359 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,348 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,342 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,335 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,322 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,317 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,306 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,298 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,290 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,279 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,272 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,264 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,261 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,257 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,250 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,239 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,233 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,236 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,233 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,226 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,217 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,213 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,196 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,182 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,174 subscribers5 September 2026 — 16,159 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 31 days, net -206. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,128–16,396 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 18:1616,159-15
3 Sept 2026, 19:2116,174-8
2 Sept 2026, 09:3716,182-14
1 Sept 2026, 10:4716,196-17
31 Aug 2026, 10:0516,213-4
30 Aug 2026, 08:4616,217-9
29 Aug 2026, 10:2816,226-7
28 Aug 2026, 09:4316,233-3
27 Aug 2026, 07:2916,236+3
26 Aug 2026, 07:3416,233-6
25 Aug 2026, 04:0216,239-11
23 Aug 2026, 21:0516,250-7
22 Aug 2026, 08:3816,257-4
20 Aug 2026, 21:1316,261-3
19 Aug 2026, 18:1716,264-8
18 Aug 2026, 16:2816,272-7
17 Aug 2026, 19:3416,279-11
16 Aug 2026, 14:0716,290-8
14 Aug 2026, 18:0516,298-8
13 Aug 2026, 07:0416,306first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,978 reactions across 20 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯52626.6%
23912.1%
👍22211.2%
🔥1728.70%
😁1698.54%
💔743.74%
🤔673.39%
😭653.29%
😢562.83%
🤣452.28%
🤡412.07%
😱351.77%
👎331.67%
271.37%
❤‍🔥271.37%
🤷‍♂251.26%
🤓190.961%
💩170.859%
🌚130.657%
120.607%
21 further kinds944.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,978 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2026 to 16 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Apr 2026, 12:04 UTC≈12,600 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @ibelokurovPoll

Как вы оцениваете свои знания в экономике?

  1. Не разбираюсь9%
  2. Примерно понимаю, что такое инфляция, безработица и экономический рост35%
  3. Знаю базовые модели и экономическую интуицию (спрос/предложение, максимизация)48%
  4. Знаю логику продвинутых моделей (QPM, RBC, NK, DSGE), могу обсуждать прогнозы и от чего они зависят5%
  5. Предыдущее + подробно знаю методологию статистики, технические детали эконом. политики4%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

💯10🎉7🤓42😐2🤡1

15 Apr 2026, 16:28 UTC≈12,000 views99 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Если вот эти последние публичные возмущения ограничениями в интернете что и напоминают, так это Манежную площадь (с поправкой на эпоху, конечно).

💯46🤔27🔥8👻6👍3💅3💩3👌1

14 Apr 2026, 18:25 UTC≈11,200 views82 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @grumpeconPhoto

Пока разного рода гетеродоксы вроде Сергея Глазьева, Олега Комолова или Павла Усанова живут в своем мирке, может казаться, что у них просто есть своя точка зрения, отличающаяся от мейнстримной. Беда в том, что время от времени они выбираются на свет божий, в большой мир и начинают играть во взрослую экономику. Они слышали, что есть математика, а еще регрессии с данными гонять можно. При этом квалификации им явно не х

😁31👍2217🥴6🤔3🔥2😐1

14 Apr 2026, 12:17 UTC≈21,500 views237 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Мне уже приходилось писать, что неожиданный, хотя и неполный успех автопроизводителей из Китая связан с тем, что меняется технологическая основа автомобилестроения. Поскольку двигатель внутреннего сгорания заменяется электродвигателем, накопленная старыми производителями экспертиза в двигателях первого типа перестает играть защитную роль от новичков-конкурентов. В такой ситуации на рынок могут зайти те, кто еще вчера

💯127💔4422🤷‍♂15👍7💩5😁5👎4

14 Apr 2026, 10:01 UTC≈6,540 views98 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @dtravin61

Читатели, полагаю, помнят, что зимой 2023 – 2024 гг. презентация первого издания моей «Русской ловушки» была запрещена в Высшей школе экономики, а затем в петербургском Доме журналиста. Поэтому сегодня, когда вышло новое издание – значительно большим тиражом, да, к тому же, с электронным вариантом и аудио вариантом, который вскоре должен быть готов, – у меня есть основания радоваться не только самому появлению книги

70👍27🤷‍♂1

14 Apr 2026, 07:57 UTC≈5,800 views78 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @LowCarbonRussiaPhoto

Европейцы хотят больше возобновляемых источников энергии, даже если это приведет к увеличению счетов за электроэнергию https://www.politico.eu/article/poll-europeans-back-renewables-despite-higher-energy-costs/ Согласно новому опросу POLITICO European Pulse, проведенному в шести европейских странах, европейцы в подавляющем большинстве поддерживают переход на возобновляемые источники энергии: двое из пяти заявили, ч

👍28😁22🤡125🔥4🤝2🫡21

13 Apr 2026, 20:14 UTC≈5,570 views92 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://t.me/podosokorsky/37544 Старая искренность.

😁35😱35😭10👍4💯2🫡2🍌1🤔1

12 Apr 2026, 18:18 UTC≈6,180 views125 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ВВП на душу населения. Данные скорректированы с учётом инфляции и различий в стоимости жизни между странами.

😭5326👍17🤡8🤯7😁52🌚2

12 Apr 2026, 15:16 UTC≈7,820 views155 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Когда восточный блок только развалился, основным претендентом на звание будущего экономического чемпиона была Венгрия. Польша была бедной даже по меркам стран того блока, СЭВ. Она вышла коммунизма в особенно неважном состоянии и с плохими вводными. Фаст-форвард 35 лет, и Польша стала экономическим колоссом на этом пространстве, а Венгрия волочится рядом. Заслуга в этом не только Виктора Орбана, но, конечно, его в пер

💯79🔥26👍18👎8🤔8🤡84🥴4

12 Apr 2026, 14:19 UTC≈5,260 views69 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @politfack

Целенаправленное выдавливание с рынка мелких провайдеров — это не какой-то новый тренд. Даже на графике в оригинальном посте видно, что число действующих лицензий стало падать после 2016 года, когда был принят «пакет Яровой»: законодательные изменения, в частности, обязали операторов связи хранить данные пользователей в течение трех лет. В 2019 году был принят закон о «суверенном интернете», который обязал операторов

😢38💯19👍63😡3

12 Apr 2026, 11:34 UTC≈5,590 views22 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://t.me/LowCarbonRussia/1273

12👍5🍌21💩1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @longviewecon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Apr 2026, 12:04 UTCAnonymous Poll2,610 voters approx.

Как вы оцениваете свои знания в экономике?

  1. Не разбираюсь9%
  2. Примерно понимаю, что такое инфляция, безработица и экономический рост35%
  3. Знаю базовые модели и экономическую интуицию (спрос/предложение, максимизация)48%
  4. Знаю логику продвинутых моделей (QPM, RBC, NK, DSGE), могу обсуждать прогнозы и от чего они зависят5%
  5. Предыдущее + подробно знаю методологию статистики, технические детали эконом. политики4%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2026 to 16 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Деньги и песец
@moneyandpolarfox · 51,056
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 August 2026
Василий Тополев
@vasil_topolev · 44,458
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Толкователь
@tolk_tolk · 125,934
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Proeconomics
@proeconomics · 68,371
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
Книжный импорт
@importknig · 35,277
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
Бла-бла-номика
@blablanomika · 45,946
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
Хулиномика
@hoolinomics · 97,808
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
Киты плывут на вписку с ЛСД
@whalesgohigh · 61,699
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
MMI
@russianmacro · 102,920
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
Гусь Василий под тополем
@gus_vasili · 37,869
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
ТС
@tihonsm · 41,943
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
Пауки в банке
@bankuyte · 92,332
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Экономика долгого времени” (@longviewecon), 16,159 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/longviewecon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.