Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
45 measurements spanning 79 days, net +130. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75,658–76,016 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 45
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Oct 2026, 21:55
75,970
-1
22 Oct 2026, 23:09
75,971
-2
21 Oct 2026, 20:18
75,973
+3
19 Oct 2026, 17:37
75,970
-5
17 Oct 2026, 17:05
75,975
+14
16 Oct 2026, 13:55
75,961
+1
15 Oct 2026, 13:36
75,960
+16
14 Oct 2026, 10:48
75,944
+19
13 Oct 2026, 00:27
75,925
+1
8 Oct 2026, 11:42
75,924
+29
4 Oct 2026, 01:56
75,895
-36
25 Sept 2026, 07:20
75,931
-30
17 Sept 2026, 07:41
75,961
+34
15 Sept 2026, 10:00
75,927
+25
13 Sept 2026, 22:19
75,902
+104
12 Sept 2026, 06:17
75,798
+4
9 Sept 2026, 22:38
75,794
+11
6 Sept 2026, 16:38
75,783
+7
4 Sept 2026, 04:36
75,776
-6
2 Sept 2026, 17:45
75,782
first reading
Engagement
63 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 160 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
45.2%
avg views ÷ 75,970 subscribers
Avg views / post
34,300
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 63 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026
Posts held
63 (3 July 2026 – 22 October 2026)
Views total
309,100
Reactions total
5,174
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Oct 2026, 17:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
651
Videos
10
Links
519
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 04s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
40,478 reactions across 63 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
12,296
30.4%
🔥
8,353
20.6%
😁
6,742
16.7%
🤣
4,363
10.8%
👍
3,891
9.61%
🤔
1,111
2.74%
❤🔥
993
2.45%
🦄
891
2.20%
😱
570
1.41%
💔
504
1.25%
🤯
467
1.15%
🤷♂
297
0.734%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40,478 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
1.59%
1 of 63 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
33,900
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
34,000
over 60 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqvKutng
1
29 September 2026
29 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 22 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Почему гробница Тутанхамона оказалась не тронута?
вдогонку к ролику про археологию
Конечно, пожалуй самая известная сейчас гробница фараона очень быстро привлекла внимание грабителей, но наполняющие ее богатства остались почти нетронутыми. Дело в том, что ограбление случилось почти сразу после захоронения — ещё в 14 веке до нашей эры. Через несколько месяцев после погребения Тутанхамона в усыпальницу вторглись злоум…
Помните у нас был видос про Гипатию — одну из самых известных женщин Античности и главу Александрийской библиотеки? Нашел в ее биографических описаниях, так сказать, стратегию касательно отношений и дейтинга.
Она стремилась к “философскому состоянию апатии — полному освобождению от эмоций и привязанностей” (кстати, если вы подумали, что как-то это близко ко всякой там восточной философии — у нас скоро про это ролик …
Держите новый видос в этот раз про Японию, христианство и то, как два этих понятия перемешались самым причудливым образом.
https://youtu.be/hT_NamvK35w
https://youtu.be/hT_NamvK35w
https://youtu.be/hT_NamvK35w
Продлеваем приём заявок на годичную программу по литературе до 3 октября.
Какие книги останутся с нами, если придётся оставить позади целую библиотеку? Мы спросили об этом научного руководителя программы Олега Воскобойникова и попросили его выбрать пять книг:
Когда пришлось уезжать навсегда и, следовательно, оставить библиотеку, собиравшуюся лет 30, ребром встал вопрос, какие несколько книг хочется забрать, чтобы о…
Помните, у нас был видос про филиппинского диктатора Фердинанда Маркоса? Президентом он стал в 1965 году, а в 1972-м ввёл военное положение и превратил страну в авторитарный режим, опиравшийся на армию и политические репрессии. Когда в 1986 году Маркоса наконец свергли, выяснилось, что семья президента вывела и спрятала за границей активы на миллиарды долларов. После этого бывшему диктатору и его семье пришлось отбив…
А вообще мы раздуплились и выложили новый видос! Сегодня — про мой любимый парадокс археологии и вообще про историю и методы этой замечательной науки, как положено, с кеками и прохладными историями.
Разбираемся, зачем уничтожать прошлое, друзья.
https://youtu.be/--jEtPiqjYs
https://youtu.be/--jEtPiqjYs
https://youtu.be/--jEtPiqjYs
Люди любят пострадать. Ну вы знаете. Среди ваших друзей такие есть, вы сами так иногда делаете. И известные люди - тоже так делают. А еще делают по ходу много глупых вещей.
В топе таких горе-страдальцев мог бы быть король Людвиг I Баварский, который правил в XIX веке. К своим 60 он не только управлял Баварией уже два десятилетия, но еще и влюбился — в 25-летнюю танцовщицу Лолу Монтес. А дальше как по сценарию — нача…
Всем привет, я тут пропадал на пару недель, извиняюсь перед всеми! Скоро будут и постики, и видосики, а я пока расскажу, чем занимался. Я провел свой первый тур, друзья! И было это, мягко говоря, ВОСХИТИТЕЛЬНО!
Оказалось, что рассказывать истории живым людям, а не камере – прикольное и слегка волнительное чувство. Плюс формат все же новый – удалось зацепить не, все, но и того, что успелось, было весьма порядочно. Ра…
История Америки через GTA
Оказывается, пока мы тут все ждали шестую часть, в Университете Теннесси в январе запустили спецкурс Grand Theft America: U.S. History Since 1980 through the GTA Video Games.
Конечно, историю можно изучать разными способами. Читать книги, слушать лекции, допрашивать ллмки или прямо на месте событий в ходе путешествий (тем более, что в наши дни это совсем не сложно – в конце-концов, билеты …
Тематическая плюшевая игрушка для канала по военной истории? Именно так!
Этот мишка во время ПМВ принадлежал британскому авиатору Уильяму Макланахану (он, конечно, шотландец, поэтому и игрушка в соответствующем прикиде).
Макланахан брал мишку в полеты в качестве счастливого талисмана – подобное, как ни странно, было в Первую мировую достаточно распространенным делом. Авиация в то время была занятием крайне опасным, …
Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @redroomtext. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 22 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Киты плывут на вписку с ЛСД @whalesgohigh · 61,586#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Стальной шлем @stahlhelm · 20,425 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 September 2026
GEO @GEOSHOW · 77,728 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
Это Файб @etofaib · 202,738 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
История и истории @historygothy · 20,778 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 September 2026
Василий Тополев @vasil_topolev · 44,546 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Karfagen @karfagen_official_te · 35,443 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
Virginia Bēowulf | английский язык @v_beowulf · 40,417 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
Филолог всея Руси @filologofrus · 42,962 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 September 2026
Пробковый шлем @pithhelmet · 23,244 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026
Артифекс | История и искусство @artifex · 19,767 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 September 2026
Киты плывут на вписку с ЛСД @whalesgohigh · 61,586 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
ПостРоссия @PostRussiaTelegram · 36,436 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
Секира Лектора @lecturerhistory · 24,491 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
Грег @gregjgeek · 23,127 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 September 2026
Siberian Teacher / Сибирский Учитель 👩🏻🏫 @siberianteacher_history · 18,944 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 5 October 2026
Хочу домой - Путешествия, в которые вы не поедете @hochu_domoj · 30,203 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 September 2026
АНТРОПОГЕНЕЗ.RU @antropogenez_ru · 36,524 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Parfenon @leonidparfenov_official · 77,684 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
Dagon @dagon_official · 25,562 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
Григорий Баженов @furydrops · 28,234 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 9 September 2026
Другая История @historyzx · 40,739 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
Всё как у зверей / радио Тимонова @timonova · 20,484 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 September 2026
Закат Империи • Время и деньги • Андрей Аксёнов @zakat_podcast · 31,351 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 September 2026
Записки о Средневековье / Notatki o Średniowieczu / Medieval Notes @medievalnotes · 20,155 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 September 2026
This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Redroom Text” (@redroomtext), 75,970 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redroomtext.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.