Прежде, чем писать по сотрудничеству, прочтите это: https://t.me/MyGapTelegram/974
По всем вопросам: @MyGapSupportBot
Задонатить Гэпу - https://t.me/MyGapDonation
Created
13 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net -608. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 88,938–89,728 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 06:58
89,029
-31
16 Sept 2026, 00:01
89,060
-61
14 Sept 2026, 06:22
89,121
-3
12 Sept 2026, 13:37
89,124
-47
10 Sept 2026, 12:36
89,171
-65
7 Sept 2026, 08:19
89,236
-27
4 Sept 2026, 16:36
89,263
-29
2 Sept 2026, 23:45
89,292
-11
1 Sept 2026, 21:15
89,303
-3
31 Aug 2026, 18:36
89,306
-11
30 Aug 2026, 19:34
89,317
-4
29 Aug 2026, 20:07
89,321
-9
28 Aug 2026, 17:12
89,330
-35
27 Aug 2026, 17:28
89,365
-16
26 Aug 2026, 17:16
89,381
-13
25 Aug 2026, 15:54
89,394
-8
24 Aug 2026, 15:05
89,402
-18
23 Aug 2026, 02:14
89,420
-14
21 Aug 2026, 16:18
89,434
-14
20 Aug 2026, 17:42
89,448
first reading
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.3%
avg views ÷ 89,029 subscribers
Avg views / post
32,400
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 40 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held
40 (25 June 2026 – 20 September 2026)
Views total
517,700
Reactions total
12,863
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Sept 2026, 10:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈716
Videos
≈35
Links
≈1,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
39,928 reactions across 39 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
10,835
27.1%
😁
7,902
19.8%
😢
7,677
19.2%
❤
4,395
11.0%
👍
4,223
10.6%
🤔
3,425
8.58%
👎
1,471
3.68%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40,445 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
100
across the posts below
Posts paid on
27
of 40 we hold a reading for · 68%
Most on one post
17
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MyGapTelegram. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Думаю, что 324 - это главное число на сегодня. Столько мест у ЕР в текущем созыве. Эти выборы это число
Увеличат36%
Уменьшат68%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
А вот так выглядит карта покрытия стран от самой SpaceX (чей Старлинк)
Чисто технически спутники ходят-бродят и над территории России.
Но совсем недавно у нас ввели запрет на ввоз неразрешенного оборудования для космической связи.
Разумеется, старлинки неразрешены. Да и не разрешат никогда.
У нас столько средств потрачено на локальную фильтрацию, а тут купил и пользуешься разблокированным интернетом, да еще беско…
Я тут наткнулся на пост, что Starlink заключила контракт с японским оператором для запуска мобильной связи по схеме: телефон - спутник без личного терминала.
Продают как спутниковый интернет на скоростях 5G. И я чё-т поймал себя на мысли, а в какой сейчас стадии проект Starlink. Честно признаюсь, мой фокус внимания на этой теме остановился лет 7 назад. Когда было первое развертывание 60 аппаратов. Тогда все еще крут…
Опля, вот и до нас доехала история с интернетом для особенных (пока демо)
Вчера рунет знатненько пробурлился от того, что в Екатеринбурге на фестивале молодежи выдали специальный доступ к интернету в обход блокировок РКН. Там была специальная WiFi-сеть для иностранных делегатов, где отключена фильтрация трафика.
Российским же участникам выдали сеть традиционную с традиционными ограничениями.
Судя по реакциям читат…
А стоит ли голосовать?
Можно бесконечно аргументировать, что выборы ни на что не влияют
Но я лично не очень понимаю смысла таких рассуждений. Я понимаю, если бы за проигрыш «твоей» партии у тебя отбирали полдома. А у тебя же на кону абсолютно ничего. Даже в морду не дадут. Нет «твоей» партии? Ну бери, которая максимально близка к тебе на диапазоне. Идеального варианта можно и не дождаться за всю жизнь.
В любом слу…
У нас тут скоро произойдет акт волеизъявления народа относительно будущего страны, и я напомню, что
к этому вопросу можно подойти на основе данных. А именно, посмотреть, как голосовали остальные партии. Несколько месяцев назад Ведомости подготовили наглядную инфографику. По ней мы видим следующее:
ЛДПР - самая конформистская партия, которая сопротивляется даже меньше, чем правящая. Да и голосует она ровно так же, к…
Когда я делал ДНК-тест, выяснилось, что у меня повышен риск некоторых нейродегенеративных заболеваний.
А так как в сентябре отмечается Всемирный день борьбы с болезнью Альцгеймера — хороший повод поговорить о том, о чем обычно вспоминаешь позже: здоровье мозга и когнитивное старение.
Один из самых известных генов, связанных с риском Альцгеймера, — APOE. Он кодирует белок, участвующий в переносе холестерина и других…
Пупупу использование ИИ делает нас тупее
Тут провели масштабное исследование на китайских школьниках 7-12 класса. Учёные 2,5 года наблюдали за 26811 учениками. Ну не прям вот за их поведением, а за их домашками. По каждому ученику была инфа по 9 предметам, точному времени выполнения и закрытые контрольные экзамены (где нельзя было юзать смартфоны).
Старт сбора инфы - сентябрь 2022. Тогда ещё никто эти нейросети не …
Мы тут с корешем обнаружили, что если делать посты в редакторе телеграм - это где вставлять карусели можно и пикчи размещаются нормально по ширине, то отображение отступов зависит от ОС
Например, на эпловских отступа между абзацами нет
На андроне и винде есть
Чтобы пользователи увидели отступ на эплОС надо сделать двойной отступ, тогда у яблочников все будет хорошо, но андронеры увидят двойной, а виндоус увидят ПОЛ…
🤣968🤔84😁68❤33👍5😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @MyGapTelegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Думаю, что 324 - это главное число на сегодня. Столько мест у ЕР в текущем созыве. Эти выборы это число
Увеличат36%
Уменьшат68%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 20 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
амоБлог @amoblog · 31,020 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
GEO @GEOSHOW · 77,701 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
ЧД @che_d_e · 37,585 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
Простая экономика @prostoecon · 295,976 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
Dagon @dagon_official · 25,781 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
После_Завтра | Николай Дубинин @poslezavtraofficial · 54,011 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Денис Борисов @sila · 103,720 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
ЗЛОЙ ЗАЙЦМАН🤬 @angryzaycman · 36,122 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
RelocationDEV by GeeckoMove @relocationdev · 23,875 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026
ПостРоссия @PostRussiaTelegram · 36,540 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
Привычка Умно💪ЖАТЬ @Habit2Reap · 35,717 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
Мудреныч @moodrenych · 25,523 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
Thoisoi @TheThoisoi · 45,321 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
Менталист @mentalroom · 22,468 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 September 2026
Александр Штефанов @alexandrshtefanov · 191,276 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
ТС @tihonsm · 41,873 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
Грег @gregjgeek · 23,220 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 September 2026
ЧЁРНЫЙ КАБИНЕТ @cabinetblack1 · 22,698 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 September 2026
Сложный процент | финансы @procent · 47,935 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 August 2026
THUJOY @TheThujoy · 26,017 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
👨🏻💻/ Марат Юсупов @maratyus · 109,306 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026
Хулиномика @hoolinomics · 99,279 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
Alek OS @Alek_OS · 32,932 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
BIOMACHINE @bmchn · 175,924 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MyGap” (@MyGapTelegram), 89,029 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MyGapTelegram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.