Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Привычка Умно💪ЖАТЬ

Channel

Привычка Умно💪ЖАТЬ

@Habit2Reap

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

35,503subscribers

-486 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001129881478
TypeChannel
Username@Habit2Reap
Description• Правила ведения личных финансов • Рекомендации экономистов, инвесторов, трейдеров • Актуальные инвестиционные идеи По рекламе: [email protected] / @shcher7 Ресурс включен в перечень РКН https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67972e41509aba56522
Created29 June 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 October 2026
Measurements held42
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Habit2Reap

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

35,50335,98935,7466 August 2026 — 35,989 subscribers6 August 2026 — 35,988 subscribers7 August 2026 — 35,979 subscribers8 August 2026 — 35,969 subscribers9 August 2026 — 35,956 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35,943 subscribers11 August 2026 — 35,934 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,926 subscribers13 August 2026 — 35,927 subscribers15 August 2026 — 35,925 subscribers17 August 2026 — 35,911 subscribers18 August 2026 — 35,905 subscribers19 August 2026 — 35,908 subscribers20 August 2026 — 35,905 subscribers21 August 2026 — 35,908 subscribers22 August 2026 — 35,915 subscribers24 August 2026 — 35,912 subscribers25 August 2026 — 35,918 subscribers26 August 2026 — 35,916 subscribers27 August 2026 — 35,915 subscribers28 August 2026 — 35,916 subscribers29 August 2026 — 35,913 subscribers30 August 2026 — 35,908 subscribers31 August 2026 — 35,910 subscribers1 September 2026 — 35,908 subscribers2 September 2026 — 35,897 subscribers4 September 2026 — 35,874 subscribers7 September 2026 — 35,842 subscribers10 September 2026 — 35,811 subscribers12 September 2026 — 35,784 subscribers14 September 2026 — 35,773 subscribers15 September 2026 — 35,752 subscribers17 September 2026 — 35,717 subscribers26 September 2026 — 35,662 subscribers4 October 2026 — 35,611 subscribers8 October 2026 — 35,586 subscribers13 October 2026 — 35,554 subscribers14 October 2026 — 35,531 subscribers15 October 2026 — 35,525 subscribers16 October 2026 — 35,519 subscribers17 October 2026 — 35,515 subscribers18 October 2026 — 35,503 subscribers6 August 202618 October 2026
42 measurements spanning 74 days, net -486. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,430–36,062 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Oct 2026, 18:0635,503-12
17 Oct 2026, 16:5535,515-4
16 Oct 2026, 15:3935,519-6
15 Oct 2026, 13:5135,525-6
14 Oct 2026, 14:0535,531-23
13 Oct 2026, 05:5735,554-32
8 Oct 2026, 22:4135,586-25
4 Oct 2026, 12:4135,611-51
26 Sept 2026, 00:0135,662-55
17 Sept 2026, 12:5735,717-35
15 Sept 2026, 14:3935,752-21
14 Sept 2026, 00:3835,773-11
12 Sept 2026, 10:3935,784-27
10 Sept 2026, 08:2035,811-31
7 Sept 2026, 02:3835,842-32
4 Sept 2026, 07:4035,874-23
2 Sept 2026, 21:0835,897-11
1 Sept 2026, 19:0335,908-2
31 Aug 2026, 19:0535,910+2
30 Aug 2026, 17:3735,908first reading

Engagement

374 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 131 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.54%
avg views ÷ 35,503 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,610
162 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.753%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
162
of 374 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 156 of 162 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 October 2026
Posts held374 (2 August 2026 – 18 October 2026)
Views total260,887
Reactions total1,894
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Oct 2026, 20:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,820
Videos
≈287
Links
≈4,930

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 02s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,562 reactions across 354 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,39718.5%
💩85011.2%
👏83111.0%
🤝81010.7%
🔥80910.7%
🗿5186.85%
❤2413.19%
😁2373.13%
🤣2012.66%
💯1922.54%
👀1902.51%
🫡1842.43%
😎1461.93%
🍾1121.48%
😢1021.35%
👌991.31%
🤔901.19%
😡831.10%
✍630.833%
🐳600.793%
17 further kinds3474.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 363 of the 374 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,696 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 374 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 18 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 372 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Habit2Reap. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 374 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 18 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Oct 2026, 16:19 UTC876 views7 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

42% россиян тратят больше, чем зарабатывают. Это их собственный ответ на вопрос, что мешает копить. Данные свежего опроса Роскачества. Ещё 39% сказали, что денег хватает ровно на текущие расходы. Складываем: восемь человек из десяти в ноль или в минус. 📉 Дальше по списку причины помельче: постоянные незапланированные траты — 8%, нет финансовой дисциплины — 3%, не вижу смысла копить — тоже 3%. Вот эти последние 3% …

👍5😁2

18 Oct 2026, 14:17 UTC≈1,080 views7 reactionsread 18 October 2026

🏦 БАНКИ ПРОГОВОРИЛИСЬ. ПОСМОТРИТЕ НА ЭТИ ЦИФРЫ В пятницу ЦБ выкатил мониторинг ставок топ-10 банков. Средняя максимальная — 13,06%, третью декаду подряд стоит колом. Но интересна не она. Интересна разбивка по срокам 👀 😄 До 3 месяцев — 12,55% 😭3–6 месяцев — 12,87% 😭 6–12 месяцев — 12,73% 🤔 Больше года — 11,75% Заметили? Чем длиннее вклад, тем хуже ставка. Отдать банку деньги на год выгоднее... на полгода. 📉 ЧТО …

👍7

18 Oct 2026, 12:15 UTC≈1,180 views9 reactionsread 18 October 2026

🎒 ДЕТИ КОПЯТ ЛУЧШЕ ВЗРОСЛЫХ. ВОТ ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВА ЮMoney опросили полторы тысячи родителей школьников, и картина получилась обидная для нас с вами 😅 24% детей скорее копят, чем тратят. Напомню утреннюю цифру по взрослым: регулярно откладывает 21%. Дети обходят родителей, имея карманные от двух до пяти тысяч в месяц. 💰 ГДЕ ОНИ ДЕРЖАТ ДЕНЬГИ Копилка — 38%. Наличка вперемешку с картой — 25%. Своя карта — 22%. Вклад, от…

🔥6🤣2👍1

18 Oct 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,240 views2 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

Ты честно отучился и честно отработал двенадцать лет. И зарабатываешь меньше курьера, которого взяли на работу за один день. Дело не в том, что ты неудачник. И не в том, что он молодец. Рынку просто плевать на твой диплом. Он платит за то, насколько ты нужен сегодня. А теперь посчитай, сколько стоит твой час. Не зарплату — именно час, вместе с дорогой на работу и обратно. У инженера и у курьера выходит одна и та же…

👍2

18 Oct 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,270 views11 reactionsread 18 October 2026

💭 ПОЧЕМУ НЕ КОПИТСЯ Доброе утречко ☀️ Вышел свежий опрос Роскачества про накопления, и там есть цифра, от которой я завис с кофе в руке ☕️ На вопрос «что мешает откладывать» 42% ответили: траты больше дохода. Ещё 39% — денег хватает ровно на текущее. То есть четверо из пяти живут в ноль или в минус. Регулярно пополняют подушку 21%. У 34% накопления есть, но они не растут — лежат и потихоньку худеют на инфляции. А 2…

👍11

17 Oct 2026, 16:09 UTC≈1,410 views19 reactionsread 18 October 2026

🎬 КИНО НА ВЕЧЕР: «АФЕРИСТ», ИЛИ КАК ОДИН ЧЕЛОВЕК УНИЧТОЖИЛ БАНК СТАРШЕ КОРОЛЕВЫ Фильм 1999 года, Rogue Trader с Юэном Макгрегором. Его почти не упоминают в подборках, а зря: это самая поучительная финансовая история, какую я знаю. 🏦 В Лондоне был банк Barings. Основан в 1762 году, финансировал войны с Наполеоном, обслуживал королевскую семью. Двести тридцать три года истории. Его убил один сотрудник за три года. Е…

👍17🔥2

17 Oct 2026, 12:51 UTC≈1,330 viewsread 18 October 2026
Poll

Ты пересел с личного авто на общественный транспорт?

  1. Да, в основном из-за цен на топливо!5%
  2. Да, в целом обслуживание тянет карман6%
  3. Да, всё что выше + парковку уже не найти у работы7%
  4. Да, посчитал, и автобус сильно дешевле, и быстрее11%
  5. Уже давно и это не связано с тратами, а исключительно из-за быстроты.22%
  6. Нет! Лучше переплачивать, но ехать с комфортом одному.48%
  7. Свой вариант в комментарии13%

The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

17 Oct 2026, 10:31 UTC≈1,290 views3 reactionsread 18 October 2026

🥇 «ЗОЛОТО НА РЕКОРДАХ». А ТЕПЕРЬ ПОСЧИТАЕМ Фраза про рекорды золота висит в лентах так долго, что превратилась в фон. Сегодня я сел и посчитал, и результат меня самого отрезвил. Унция стоит около 4 170 долларов. Второго марта она стоила 5 377. То есть золото на 22% ниже мартовского максимума. В рублях картина та же: грамм на бирже 11 269 против 13 346 в начале марта, минус 15,6%. Никаких рекордов. Отскок. 📉 КАК ЭТО…

🤝2👍1

17 Oct 2026, 07:10 UTC≈1,310 views15 reactionsread 18 October 2026

☕️ СУББОТНЯЯ РЕВИЗИЯ. 15 МИНУТ И ЧАШКА КОФЕ Доброе утро. Сегодня предлагаю не читать, а делать. Берите телефон, открывайте банковское приложение, и за четверть часа найдём деньги, которые утекают мимо вас прямо сейчас. Начну с цифры, которая меня в своё время удивила. 72% россиян хотя бы раз теряли деньги на забытой подписке, и каждый пятый из них сталкивается с этим регулярно. При этом ровно половина людей может н…

👍15

16 Oct 2026, 14:17 UTC≈1,350 views10 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

🧠 ПРИВЫЧКА СПРАШИВАТЬ. ВЫПУСК 13 Женя просит разобрать Балтийский лизинг. Предупрежу сразу: это самая тяжёлая бумага из всех, что мы здесь смотрели. Начну со стакана. 📉 ЦЕНЫ В обращении 16 выпусков. Вот как они стоят сегодня: БО-П24, погашение в 2029 — 63,9% от номинала БО-П19, 2028 — 64,7% БО-П18, 2028 — 68,3% БО-П22, 2028 — 70,4% Доходности по ним от 50 до 95% годовых. Чтобы понять масштаб, я снял доходности сосе…

👍9🤝1

16 Oct 2026, 12:15 UTC≈1,280 views10 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

📰 «ИНДЕКС ПОДСКОЧИЛ НА АНОНСЕ». ПРОВЕРЯЕМ Сегодня в лентах разошлось: Мосбиржа взлетела после того, как Песков анонсировал международный телефонный разговор президента. Факты такие. На брифинге прозвучало, что вечером ожидается международный разговор, с кем именно — не уточнили. Индекс сейчас 2409,88, плюс 0,97%, дневной максимум 2412,72. Цифры верные. Причина притянута. Показываю почему. 🥇 ЧТО НЕ СХОДИТСЯ Лучшая…

👍9🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 374 posts we hold for @Habit2Reap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Habit2Reap edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Oct 2026, 12:51 UTCAnonymous Poll184 voters

Ты пересел с личного авто на общественный транспорт?

  1. Да, в основном из-за цен на топливо!5%
  2. Да, в целом обслуживание тянет карман6%
  3. Да, всё что выше + парковку уже не найти у работы7%
  4. Да, посчитал, и автобус сильно дешевле, и быстрее11%
  5. Уже давно и это не связано с тратами, а исключительно из-за быстроты.22%
  6. Нет! Лучше переплачивать, но ехать с комфортом одному.48%
  7. Свой вариант в комментарии13%

The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Oct 2026, 12:50 UTCAnonymous Poll407 voters

Голосуем 👇 Сколько в месяц нужно лично тебе, чтобы перестать переживать о деньгах?

  1. До 100 тысяч4%
  2. 100-200 тысяч17%
  3. 200-400 тысяч34%
  4. 400-700 тысяч26%
  5. Больше миллиона9%
  6. Дело не в сумме, а в подушке8%
  7. Мне уже хватает2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTCAnonymous Poll146 voters

Инвестидея или повезет в лотерею ⁉️😉

  1. Инвестиидея – живу реальностью 🗿68%
  2. Мне точно повезут в лотерею 😀36%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTCAnonymous Poll263 voters

Москва или Питер? А может и не они? Какой регион России впереди по инновациям?

  1. Питер10%
  2. Москва50%
  3. Томск11%
  4. Новосибирск28%
  5. Нижний11%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

8 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTCAnonymous Poll830 voters

Я богат, если мой доход в месяц

  1. 100 000₽5%
  2. 200 000 ₽8%
  3. 300 000 ₽16%
  4. 400 000 ₽10%
  5. 500 000 ₽19%
  6. 500 000+ (вне рамок исследования)40%
  7. МРОТ есть и хорошо5%
  8. Не в деньгах счастье12%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTCAnonymous Poll154 voters

Сайты российских банков (Сбер, Т-Банк, ВТБ, Альфа и др) не открываются теперь в зарубежных браузерах. Как сам⁉️(несколько вариантов ответа)

  1. Установил сертификаты Минцифры19%
  2. Установил сертификаты Минцифры19%
  3. Сижу-матерюсь, пытаюсь все установить12%
  4. Не помню пароли, а там надо14%
  5. Придется идти в отделение банка9%
  6. Задолбался55%

The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 374 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 18 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

ЗЛОЙ ЗАЙЦМАН🤬
@angryzaycman · 36,005
#1
КриптоЗайцман
@cryptozaycman · 21,319
#2
Т-Инвестиции
@tb_invest_official · 524,913
#3
MarketTwits
@markettwits · 337,827
#4
IF News
@if_market_news · 118,829
#5
InvestFuture
@investfuture · 183,227
#6
СЛЕЗЫ САТОШИ
@slezisatoshi · 122,772
#7
Хулиномика
@hoolinomics · 99,074
#8
IF Stocks
@if_stocks · 119,469
#9
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 970,196
#10
headlines
@headlines_for_traders · 115,090
#11
bitkogan
@bitkogan · 258,590
#12
На пенсию в 35 лет
@pensiya35 · 123,548
#13
РынкиДеньгиВласть | РДВ
@AK47pfl · 115,191
#14
Сигналы РЦБ
@cbrstocks · 117,450
#15
Финансовая нeзaвисимость
@fndb777 · 65,659
#16
MyGap
@MyGapTelegram · 88,672
#17
Лепра
@Lepragram · 341,684
#18
💰 WALL STREET PRO
@thewallstreetpro · 46,471
#19
ЗЛОЙ ФИНАНСИСТ 😡
@finpizdec · 54,581
#20
IF Bonds — Облигации РФ
@if_bonds · 94,696
#21
Инвестиции с Оксаной Мащенко
@investoksana · 51,517
#22
Crypto Headlines
@crypto_hd · 131,699
#23
Деньги24
@M24_Dengi · 36,708
#24
Альфа-Инвестиции
@alfa_investments · 706,472
#25
PROFIT
@profit1 · 191,259
#26
Альфа-Банк
@alfabank · 979,886
#27
Смирнов Недвижимость | Vysotsky Estate
@ogo_nedviga · 81,188
#28
ForkLog
@forklog · 91,668
#29
Простая экономика
@prostoecon · 300,817
#30
Фининди | Александр Елисеев
@Finindie · 73,428
#31
ХарчевниковИлита
@kharchevnikov · 121,973
#32
Т—Ж
@t_jrnl · 98,480
#33
Профита нет. А если найду?
@profitanet · 204,354
#34
Инвест Мемы
@investmemes · 6,406
#35
Банк России
@centralbank_russia · 243,912
#36
Кира Юхтенко
@kira_pronira · 65,088
#37
Николай Мрочковский
@mrochkovskiy · 71,820
#38
Инвестиции сегодня, Трейдинг, Экономика, Акции - ProfitGate. Кречетов.
@ProfitGate · 78,629
#39
[netstalkers]
@netstalkers · 64,589
#40
Криптомир с Оксаной Мащенко
@cryptooxana · 20,623
#41
bitkogan⚡️HOTLINE
@bitkogan_hotline · 83,189
#42
Сам ты инвестор!
@selfinvestor · 127,234
#43
Сложный процент | финансы
@procent · 47,001
#44
IKIGAI
@ikigaimain · 97,814
#45
📚 Доказательное Инвестирование
@invest_science_channel · 38,534
#46
ДИВИДЕНДЫ INVESTMINT
@investmint · 55,052
#47
Богатейший ДИ / ИИ /
@richdi · 43,328
#48
Миша инвестирует
@mihinvest · 14,205
#49
CRYPTUS MEDIA
@CRYPTUS_MEDIA · 70,348
#50
Мультипликатор
@multievan · 860,812
#51
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,136
#52
Двач
@dvachannel · 973,175
#53
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 866,704
#54
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,783
#55
Банкста
@banksta · 438,670
#56
Новости Walt (ранее Кошелёк)
@walt_news_cis · 1,101,657
#57
Быть Или
@ToBeOr_Official · 304,605
#58
СТАС БОМБИТ
@ikakprosto · 324,491
#59
Rozetked
@rozetked · 657,425
#60
Ateo Breaking
@ateobreaking · 748,318
#61
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,017,304
#62
Банки, деньги, два офшора
@bankrollo · 459,965
#63
Gram RUS
@toncoin_rus · 516,572
#64
Дудь
@yurydud · 856,700
#65
Бэкдор
@whackdoor · 1,567,589
#66
Coin Post – Деньги, инвестиции, биткоин
@Coin_Post · 286,990
#67
NN
@naebnet · 2,194,124
#68
SVTV NEWS — Либертарианское СМИ
@svtvnews · 112,717
#69
Сталингулаг
@stalin_gulag · 299,450
#70
DeCenter — блокчейн, биткоин, инвестиции
@DeCenter · 1,719,074
#71
Код.ру
@d_code · 405,435
#72
IF Crypto
@if_crypto_ru · 52,554
#73
Mr Mozart
@mr_mozart · 128,110
#74
[BadComedian]
@TheBadComedian · 605,841
#75
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 491,960
#76
Antipov
@antipov · 397,994
#77
Crypto Falcon
@falconinvestors · 82,804
#78
Dzari
@DrDzari · 265,002
#79
Алексей Марков
@markofglory · 14,750
#80
Копеечка в кошельке
@kopeechkav · 55,042
#81
СОЛОДИН LIVE
@goodtraders · 44,890
#82
GENESIS
@trend_gen · 54,956
#83
Dictator Crypto
@DictatorCryptoDCT · 20,650
#84
САТОШИ NEWS
@satoshinews · 29,865
#85
Пикабу
@pikabu · 255,162
#86
РБК Крипто
@RBCCrypto · 131,796
#87
Incrypted
@incrypted · 107,743
#88
Т-Банк
@tbank · 331,834
#89
Do4a - Третье Дыхание 🫦
@Do4aMedia · 15,654
#90
Crypto Daily – биткоин, криптовалюта
@cryptodaily · 84,587
#91
Минцифры России
@mintsifry · 233,613
#92
Финансовые мемы
@finmeme · 9,266
#93
The ExtremeCode Times
@extremecode · 35,656
#94
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,062,322
#95
ВИЛСАКОМ РЕД / WYLSACOM RED
@wylsared · 1,102,514
#96
Лентач
@oldlentach · 263,500
#97

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

КриптоЗайцман
@cryptozaycman · 21,319
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 September 2026
ЗЛОЙ ЗАЙЦМАН🤬
@angryzaycman · 36,005
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Реальные инвестиции с Булатом
@depoinvesting · 30,098
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
Финансовая нeзaвисимость
@fndb777 · 65,659
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Привычка Умно💪ЖАТЬ” (@Habit2Reap), 35,503 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Habit2Reap.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.