Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -84. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,590–21,700 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 01:38
21,603
-5
15 Sept 2026, 22:38
21,608
-1
14 Sept 2026, 04:20
21,609
-2
12 Sept 2026, 11:36
21,611
-3
10 Sept 2026, 08:38
21,614
+1
7 Sept 2026, 02:02
21,613
-8
4 Sept 2026, 11:18
21,621
+1
2 Sept 2026, 19:48
21,620
-3
1 Sept 2026, 20:57
21,623
-5
31 Aug 2026, 22:16
21,628
-4
31 Aug 2026, 01:17
21,632
-1
29 Aug 2026, 02:08
21,633
-3
28 Aug 2026, 03:23
21,636
+1
27 Aug 2026, 04:55
21,635
-4
26 Aug 2026, 02:34
21,639
+3
24 Aug 2026, 23:22
21,636
-4
23 Aug 2026, 11:36
21,640
+1
21 Aug 2026, 22:16
21,639
-6
20 Aug 2026, 14:23
21,645
+1
19 Aug 2026, 17:02
21,644
first reading
Engagement
138 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.1%
avg views ÷ 21,603 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,830
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 138 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
138 (3 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
113,293
Reactions total
3,124
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 13:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 18s
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,663 reactions across 128 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
5,239
54.2%
🔥
3,160
32.7%
🤯
756
7.82%
😁
296
3.06%
🕊
119
1.23%
😢
56
0.58%
👎
37
0.383%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 133 of the 138 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,007 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
262
across the posts below
Posts paid on
104
of 133 we hold a reading for · 78%
Most on one post
62
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @qwerty_live. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 138 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Квантовое падение: физики подтвердили правоту Эйнштейна на уровне атомов
Классическая и квантовая механика десятилетиями говорят на разных языках, однако новое совместное исследование физиков из Ульмского университета, Оксфордского университета и Университета Бен-Гуриона в Негеве сделало важный шаг к их диалогу. Ученые впервые напрямую зафиксировали, как гравитация влияет на квантовый объект в свободном падении, под…
Найден новый кандидат на роль темной материи
На глубине около 1,6 километра под землей, в лаборатории Сэнфорд в Южной Дакоте, установка LUX-ZEPLIN зарегистрировала необычное взаимодействие частицы, которое ученые пока не могут объяснить известными фоновыми процессами. Для поиска гипотетических слабовзаимодействующих массивных частиц — вимпов — исследователи используют резервуар с десятью тоннами сверхчистого жидкого…
🌚 К Луне провели "интернет"
Специалисты Центра технологий и инженерии космических систем при Академии наук Китая сообщают об успешном развертывании двусторонней лазерной линии связи на колоссальной дистанции около 400 000 километров. Годовые орбитальные испытания подтвердили: оптическая магистраль между Землей и лунной орбитой полностью функциональна.
Привычная радиосвязь уже исчерпала свой ресурс перед лицом масшт…
Инженеры научились передавать аудио строго одному слушателю
Инженеры из Пхоханского университета науки и технологии (POSTECH) создали акустическую систему MiPAL, способную транслировать звук направленно, словно луч света. Новинка решает давнюю проблему рассеивания акустических волн, позволяя человеку слушать музыку или смотреть кино в людном месте без наушников и не мешая окружающим.
Обычные параметрические излучат…
Внутри одного сверхпроводника прятался второй
Физики из Еврейского университета в Иерусалиме разгадали давнюю квантовую головоломку. При ультратонком срезе всего в несколько атомных слоев диселенид ниобия (NbSe₂) и дисульфид тантала (TaS₂) долгое время считались системами с простой организацией и единой энергетической щелью — ключевым параметром спаривания электронов для движения с нулевым сопротивлением.
Однако то…
🐸 Генетики описали семь неизвестных ранее видов лягушек (ромбофринов)
Международная группа исследователей описала семь новых видов малоизученных ромбофринов — эндемичных бесхвостых амфибий из рода Rhombophryne, обитающих на Мадагаскаре. Чтобы распутать сложнейший таксономический ребус, ученым потребовалось более 12 лет кропотливой работы, объединившей полевые наблюдения, анализ акустических сигналов, анатомические и…
🌎 А Вы знали, что Земля это не шар?
На последней опубликованной детальной визуализации от NASA видно, что наша с вами Земля — это геоид. Новая карта построена исключительно на основе гравитационного поля планеты без учета приливов, морских течений и атмосферного давления и показывает теоретический уровень Мирового океана под материками.
Геоид служит фундаментальной основой для геодезии: гравитация определяет направ…
💎 Сверхтонкий гибкий алмаз научили вырабатывать электричество при сгибании
С начала XX века алмаз считался неспособным генерировать электрическое напряжение при механической деформации. Из-за отсутствия пьезоэлектрического отклика этот минерал, несмотря на исключительную прочность, теплопроводность и химическую стойкость, использовался в микроэлектромеханических системах лишь как пассивная подложка.
Исследовательск…
Гигантский австралийский робот-паук для экспресс-печати жилья
Роботизированный комплекс Charlotte, напоминающий гигантского паука, создан австралийскими инженерами и способный возвести полноценное здание буквально за сутки. Конструкция машины позволяет ей создавать жилой дом площадью 200 м² всего за 24 часа.
Главная особенность установки — неприхотливость к исходному сырью. Робот задействует ресурсы, находящиеся пр…
Система "теплый пол" Марса: ученые обнаружили гигантскую тепловую аномалию в недрах Красной планеты
Красная планета оказалась устроена куда сложнее, чем предполагали: ее недра разогреты неравномерно. Анализ гравитационных аномалий показал, что под южным полушарием Марса мантия на 200–400 °C горячее, чем под северным, и местами может находиться в частично расплавленном состоянии.
К такому выводу пришла международная…
🚮 Моторное масло из ПВХ
Пластик поливинилхлорид (ПВХ) окружает нас повсюду — от водопроводных труб и оконных профилей до банковских карт и детских игрушек. Однако из-за высокого содержания хлора и обилия фабричных добавок этот полимер крайне неохотно поддается переработке и чаще всего оседает на свалках. Химики из Виргинского политехнического института нашли способ дать капризным отходам новую жизнь, превратив их в …
🌌 Вселенная продолжает разгоняться вопреки сомнениям
Слухи о том, что расширение Вселенной сбавляет обороты, оказались преждевременными. Международная группа астрофизиков опровергла недавние выводы южнокорейских коллег, заявлявших об ослаблении темной энергии. Стандартная космологическая модель устояла: разгон продолжается, хотя природа загадочной силы все еще остается тайной.
В масштабном анализе, опубликованном в…
👍53🔥15🤯5👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 138 posts we hold for @qwerty_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🔝 Самая интересная новость №384 ⤴️?
(Выбираем несколько вариантов)
➡️ О нановолосках, которые защищают гекконов от обезвоживания20%
➡️ О печенье, которое дрожжи делают из пластика и биомассы44%
➡️ О первом наблюдении оптического эффекта Магнуса30%
➡️ О глазных каплях, вернувших светочувствительность слепым мышам56%
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Физика от Побединского @physfrompobed · 25,937 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
Vert Dider @vertdider · 26,948 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
Космос просто @cosmosprosto · 60,854 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
Thoisoi @TheThoisoi · 45,321 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
Неземной телеграм / Астроном Сурдин @nezemnoy_telegram · 96,287 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
Вселенная Плюс @vselennayaplus · 83,091 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
#энерголикбез @operby · 35,699 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
Химия – Просто @ChemistryEasy · 25,134 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“QWERTY” (@qwerty_live), 21,603 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qwerty_live.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.