Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for QWERTY

Channel

QWERTY

@qwerty_live

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,522subscribers

-165 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001172354652
TypeChannel
Username@qwerty_live
Created12 December 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/qwerty_live

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

21,52221,68721,604.56 August 2026 — 21,687 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,687 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,685 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,682 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,680 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,679 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,678 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,671 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,668 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,662 subscribers15 August 2026 — 21,657 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,655 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,653 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,644 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,645 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,639 subscribers23 August 2026 — 21,640 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21,636 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,639 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,635 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,636 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,633 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,632 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,628 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,623 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,620 subscribers4 September 2026 — 21,621 subscribers7 September 2026 — 21,613 subscribers10 September 2026 — 21,614 subscribers12 September 2026 — 21,611 subscribers14 September 2026 — 21,609 subscribers15 September 2026 — 21,608 subscribers18 September 2026 — 21,603 subscribers29 September 2026 — 21,584 subscribers5 October 2026 — 21,576 subscribers9 October 2026 — 21,571 subscribers13 October 2026 — 21,570 subscribers14 October 2026 — 21,571 subscribers16 October 2026 — 21,567 subscribers17 October 2026 — 21,563 subscribers18 October 2026 — 21,561 subscribers19 October 2026 — 21,558 subscribers21 October 2026 — 21,556 subscribers22 October 2026 — 21,551 subscribers23 October 2026 — 21,552 subscribers25 October 2026 — 21,550 subscribers26 October 2026 — 21,548 subscribers27 October 2026 — 21,547 subscribers28 October 2026 — 21,550 subscribers29 October 2026 — 21,549 subscribers30 October 2026 — 21,548 subscribers31 October 2026 — 21,550 subscribers1 November 2026 — 21,542 subscribers2 November 2026 — 21,540 subscribers3 November 2026 — 21,537 subscribers4 November 2026 — 21,531 subscribers5 November 2026 — 21,525 subscribers6 November 2026 — 21,522 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 92 days, net -165. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,497–21,712 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 15:1621,522-3
5 Nov 2026, 12:4621,525-6
4 Nov 2026, 14:4021,531-6
3 Nov 2026, 11:1821,537-3
2 Nov 2026, 07:4021,540-2
1 Nov 2026, 07:3621,542-8
31 Oct 2026, 06:2821,550+2
30 Oct 2026, 05:3621,548-1
29 Oct 2026, 05:4121,549-1
28 Oct 2026, 04:3021,550+3
27 Oct 2026, 04:3521,547-1
26 Oct 2026, 03:4721,548-2
25 Oct 2026, 02:1721,550-2
23 Oct 2026, 07:1821,552+1
22 Oct 2026, 06:5621,551-5
21 Oct 2026, 03:3121,556-2
19 Oct 2026, 03:4121,558-3
18 Oct 2026, 04:2621,561-2
17 Oct 2026, 03:4921,563-4
16 Oct 2026, 00:2821,567first reading

Engagement

240 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.9%
avg views ÷ 21,522 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,780
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 240 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 46 of 47 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held240 (3 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total130,520
Reactions total3,639
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 14:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 18s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

17,230 reactions across 226 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8,98652.2%
🔥5,83833.9%
🤯1,3828.02%
😁5433.15%
🕊2271.32%
😢1761.02%
👎600.348%
🤡180.104%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 231 of the 240 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,574 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 240 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
293
across the posts below
Posts paid on
124
of 232 we hold a reading for · 53%
Most on one post
62
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @qwerty_live. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 240 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 49 posts held from the last 30 days (6.12%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 08:00 UTC≈1,510 views57 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥37👍14🤡3😁3

5 Nov 2026, 20:04 UTC≈2,100 views60 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍46🔥9🤯5

5 Nov 2026, 16:16 UTC≈2,290 views78 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍45🤯28😁4🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 16:06 UTC≈2,190 views58 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍37🔥18🤯3

4 Nov 2026, 15:02 UTC≈2,640 views73 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥42👍25🕊4😁2

4 Nov 2026, 13:02 UTC≈2,560 views54 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍43🔥11

4 Nov 2026, 11:01 UTC≈2,520 views59 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍49🔥7🤯2😢1

4 Nov 2026, 07:04 UTC≈2,670 views68 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍46🔥17🤯3😁2

3 Nov 2026, 16:01 UTC≈2,660 views76 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥53👍16🤯7

3 Nov 2026, 14:03 UTC≈2,650 views100 reactions4 Starsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥68👍23🤯8😁1

3 Nov 2026, 12:04 UTC≈2,560 views76 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍48🔥27😁1

3 Nov 2026, 08:38 UTC≈2,690 views115 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

😢80🕊18👍16👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 240 posts we hold for @qwerty_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTCAnonymous Poll254 voters

🔝 Самая интересная новость №384 ⤴️? (Выбираем несколько вариантов)

  1. ➡️ О нановолосках, которые защищают гекконов от обезвоживания20%
  2. ➡️ О печенье, которое дрожжи делают из пластика и биомассы44%
  3. ➡️ О первом наблюдении оптического эффекта Магнуса30%
  4. ➡️ О глазных каплях, вернувших светочувствительность слепым мышам56%

The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 240 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Космос просто
@cosmosprosto · 62,306
#1
Физика от Побединского
@physfrompobed · 27,253
#2
r/ретранслятор
@retra · 165,780
#3
Rozetked
@rozetked · 648,456
#4
N + 1
@nplusone · 65,388
#5
ТОПЛЕС
@toplesofficial · 499,589
#6
Пушка | Передний край науки и технологий
@sci_one_tv · 15,969
#7
Naked Science
@nsmag · 247,062
#8
Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 140,405
#9
Vert Dider
@vertdider · 27,111
#10
Хабр
@habr_com · 134,298
#11
Вселенная Плюс
@vselennayaplus · 83,714
#12
Неземной телеграм / Астроном Сурдин
@nezemnoy_telegram · 96,796
#13
Space Room | Космос
@inSpaceRoom · 10,913
#14
[netstalkers]
@netstalkers · 64,450
#15
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 970,619
#16
Код.ру
@d_code · 405,441
#17
Kosmo
@kosmo_off · 90,213
#18
Droider
@droidergram · 101,399
#19
НАУЧ ПОП
@sergei_nauchpop · 4,985
#20
Бэкдор
@whackdoor · 1,542,951
#21
Neural Shit
@NeuralShit · 54,647
#22
Лепра
@Lepragram · 340,963
#23
Zelenyikot и космос
@egorovkot · 17,928
#24
SciTopus – Наука и научпоп
@SciTopus · 9,972
#25
Astro Channel
@astro_channel · 10,025
#26
Лаборатория Научных Видео
@ScienceVideoLab · 5,599
#27
Мой Компьютер
@mknewsru · 214,710
#28
Чёрный Треугольник
@black_triangle_tg · 63,971
#29
Промпт - Наука и Техника
@Scienceg · 93,366
#30
НаукаPRO
@naukaproo · 9,240
#31
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,816
#32
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 865,612
#33
Двач
@dvachannel · 970,189
#34
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,059,560
#35
Дудь
@yurydud · 850,752
#36
НЕВЗОРОВ
@nevzorovtv · 1,002,207
#37
Улица Шкловского - Астрономия и Космонавтика
@ShklovskyStr · 19,227
#38
[BadComedian]
@TheBadComedian · 605,233
#39
Анатолий Шарий
@asupersharij · 1,735,482
#40
Быть Или
@ToBeOr_Official · 304,298
#41
Ateo Breaking
@ateobreaking · 741,824
#42
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,028,945
#43
Лентач
@lentachold · 391,746
#44
Накипело. Майкл Наки
@Nackepelo · 215,109
#45
Сталингулаг
@stalin_gulag · 297,992
#46
Пездуза
@pezduzalive · 369,175
#47
BBC News | Русская служба
@bbcrussian · 388,830
#48
Александр Панчин
@ScienceInquisition · 49,205
#49
MyGap
@MyGapTelegram · 88,401
#50
ВИЛСАКОМ РЕД / WYLSACOM RED
@wylsared · 1,090,658
#51
Yaplakal.com
@yaplakal · 420,082
#52
PRO Hi-Tech
@prohitec · 69,583
#53
aavst2022
@aavst2022 · 175,279
#54
Thoisoi
@TheThoisoi · 45,086
#55
эйай ньюз
@ai_newz · 98,218
#56
sndk
@sndkgram · 357,753
#57
addmeto
@addmeto · 71,985
#58
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 490,580
#59
Макар Светлый
@makarsvet13 · 3,851
#60
Илья Яшин
@yashin_russia · 133,715
#61
Дождь | Новости
@tvrain · 467,930
#62
nerds
@nerds · 411,366
#63
Алексей Пивоваров
@Alexey_Pivo_varov · 304,603
#64
Alpha Centauri | Космос
@alphacentaurichannel · 34,368
#65
Пикабу
@pikabu · 254,979
#66
Сиолошная
@seeallochnaya · 81,058
#67
DS ASTRO🌚
@dsastro2 · 3,901
#68
Utopia Show
@topapopa · 369,706
#69
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,779
#70
SpaceX
@spacex_rus · 17,166
#71
AlexGyver 🛠 Channel
@alexgyvershow · 78,132
#72
Страдающее Средневековье
@pophistory · 140,198
#73
АНТРОПОГЕНЕЗ.RU
@antropogenez_ru · 36,578
#74
СТАС БОМБИТ
@ikakprosto · 322,955
#75
Максим Кац
@maximkatz · 167,585
#76
The Insider
@theinsider · 152,817
#77
UsachevRuslan
@usachevruslan · 236,044
#78
Злой Крастер
@angrycrust · 123,017
#79
PLUSHEV/ПЛЮЩЕВ
@PlushevChannel · 97,996
#80
Смотровая Военврача
@dr_voenvrach · 45,360
#81
Картавый продюсер / Иван Кобзарев
@producerpodcastov · 3,476
#82
IT Юмор
@ithumor · 60,074
#83
4chan
@ru4chan · 182,206
#84
James Webb Space Telescope
@JamesWebbTelescope · 11,599
#85
Дабл Ять
@otsuka_bld · 158,913
#86
На Zzzzzападном фронте без перемен
@ve4niyvoy · 112,497
#87
Programmer & IT Memes
@itmemes · 121,992
#88
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,117,673
#89
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,557,779
#90
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 299,917
#91
Пекарня
@pekagame · 1,120,111
#92
Макаренков об играх
@makarenkoff_games · 28,467
#93
Conflict Intelligence Team
@CITeam · 86,486
#94

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Физика от Побединского
@physfrompobed · 27,253
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
Vert Dider
@vertdider · 27,111
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
Космос просто
@cosmosprosto · 62,306
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
Thoisoi
@TheThoisoi · 45,086
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
Неземной телеграм / Астроном Сурдин
@nezemnoy_telegram · 96,796
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
Улица Шкловского - Астрономия и Космонавтика
@ShklovskyStr · 19,227
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 3 October 2026
Вселенная Плюс
@vselennayaplus · 83,714
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Артифекс | История и искусство
@artifex · 19,702
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 September 2026
#энерголикбез
@operby · 35,893
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
Химия – Просто
@ChemistryEasy · 24,895
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“QWERTY” (@qwerty_live), 21,522 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qwerty_live.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.