25 measurements spanning 27 days, net +65. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,905–26,022 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Sept 2026, 07:03
25,983
-4
1 Sept 2026, 07:38
25,987
-9
31 Aug 2026, 08:53
25,996
+5
30 Aug 2026, 05:54
25,991
-6
29 Aug 2026, 05:34
25,997
+1
28 Aug 2026, 03:03
25,996
-9
26 Aug 2026, 23:35
26,005
+1
26 Aug 2026, 00:04
26,004
+5
25 Aug 2026, 02:18
25,999
-6
23 Aug 2026, 15:28
26,005
+4
22 Aug 2026, 00:17
26,001
-7
20 Aug 2026, 15:23
26,008
+9
19 Aug 2026, 18:42
25,999
+6
18 Aug 2026, 15:58
25,993
+18
17 Aug 2026, 12:43
25,975
+2
16 Aug 2026, 04:28
25,973
+4
14 Aug 2026, 14:14
25,969
-2
13 Aug 2026, 03:15
25,971
+7
12 Aug 2026, 00:15
25,964
+7
10 Aug 2026, 00:29
25,957
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.4%
avg views ÷ 25,983 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,680
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
15 (8 July 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
78,160
Reactions total
2,805
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 22:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
558
Videos
136
Links
162
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
3m 40s
Average length
55s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,517 reactions across 15 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,420
31.4%
👍
1,046
23.2%
😁
953
21.1%
❤
698
15.5%
🤣
171
3.79%
🗿
40
0.886%
🤯
18
0.398%
👏
13
0.288%
🤔
13
0.288%
🎉
11
0.244%
🆒
10
0.221%
🐳
10
0.221%
😭
9
0.199%
🙉
8
0.177%
❤🔥
7
0.155%
🤡
7
0.155%
👀
5
0.111%
👌
5
0.111%
👻
5
0.111%
👾
5
0.111%
23 further kinds
63
1.39%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,517 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 15 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @physfrompobed. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Поздравляем с первым днём осени и первым учебным днём!
Желаем, чтобы энергия никогда не стремилась к нулю, любопытство только набирало ускорение, а тяга к новым знаниям оставалась постоянной величиной.
Пусть учёба даётся легко, сложные задачи находят решения, а новый учебный год принесёт много интересных открытий.
С 1 сентября!
Какая связь между телескопом и бельгийским пивом?
TRAPPIST — это два роботизированных телескопа, которые созданы и управляются астрофизиками Льежского университета (хотя физически находятся в Чили и Марокко соответственно). Главными задачами этих инструментов является поиск комет и экзопланет, на что намекает название: TRAnsiting Planets and Planetesimals Small Telescope (малый телескоп для наблюдения за транзитными…
Annus mirabilis: какой год был лучшим в истории физики?
«Год чудес» (лат. annus mirabilis) — латинское выражение, которым называют год, отмеченный особенно важными или выдающимися событиями.
В истории физики одним из самых известных таких периодов стали 1665–1666 годы Исаака Ньютона. Из-за эпидемии чумы Кембриджский университет закрылся, и Ньютон, незадолго до этого получивший степень бакалавра, уехал в родовое пом…
Все, кто так или иначе причастен к большой науке – этот пост для вас! И не только учёные: научные журналисты, популяризаторы, авторы контента о науке, организаторы крупных научных проектов и грантовых программ.
Осталось буквально несколько дней, чтобы подать заявку на премию «За верность науке», которая является значимым мероприятием проводимого в стране Десятилетия науки и технологий. Уверен, многим из вас есть чем…
Твердая жидкость? Или жидкая твердость?
Вулканический песок на видео демонстрирует неньютоновское поведение. В спокойном состоянии он медленно течёт под действием собственного веса, но при резком сжатии или ударе становится заметно жёстче и сильнее сопротивляется деформации.
Причина в структуре влажной смеси. Она состоит из большого количества мелких, шероховатых и угловатых частиц, между которыми находится вода. П…
Сегодня рассказываем, где в городе можно увидеть проявления теплового расширения и как инженеры его компенсируют. А какие примеры знаете вы? Делитесь в комментариях!
Голубая лава
С точки зрения физики название обманчиво: настоящей голубой лавы здесь нет.
Самое известное место, где наблюдают это явление, — вулкан Кавах-Иджен в Индонезии. Из трещин в его кратере выходят раскалённые вулканические газы, содержащие соединения серы. Их температура может превышать 600 °C. При контакте с кислородом сера воспламеняется и горит ярким голубым пламенем.
Часть серы при этом переходит в жид…
Усиливают ли звук слуховые трубки?
Задолго до электронных слуховых аппаратов существовали слуховые трубки — устройства в форме раструба или спирали, которые собирали звуковые волны с большой площади и направляли в ухо. Лучшие переносные модели XIX века могли повышать уровень звука примерно на 15–25 дБ, а крупные и хорошо прилегающие к уху — местами до 20–30 дБ. (Cубъективно прибавка в 20 дБ воспринимается как четырё…
Если бы корову объясняли на разных курсах физфака.
🔥237😁132👍27❤26🙉5🗿4😭4🤔3
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @physfrompobed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 710,142 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Thoisoi @TheThoisoi · 45,420 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
Космос просто @cosmosprosto · 60,773 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
Вселенная Плюс @vselennayaplus · 83,022 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
NASA | Физика | Астрономия @kosmos149 · 88,799 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
Неземной телеграм / Астроном Сурдин @nezemnoy_telegram · 96,041 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
#энерголикбез @operby · 35,619 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
GEO @GEOSHOW · 77,073 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Физика от Побединского” (@physfrompobed), 25,983 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/physfrompobed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.