Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Vert Dider

Channel

Vert Dider

@vertdider

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

26,927subscribers

+57 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001334237701
TypeChannel
Username@vertdider
DescriptionОфициальный телеграм-канал студии Vert Dider По вопросам рекламы: [email protected] По вопросам сотрудничества: [email protected] Регистрация РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/676d336d1e4e233a7189bfeb
Created26 December 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vertdider

Growth

26,86626,93326,899.56 August 2026 — 26,870 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,871 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,867 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,866 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,869 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,884 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26,906 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,899 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,894 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,890 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,916 subscribers21 August 2026 — 26,933 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26,927 subscribers26,9276 August 202622 August 2026
13 measurements spanning 17 days, net +57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,856–26,943 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 19:5426,927-6
21 Aug 2026, 12:4726,933+17
20 Aug 2026, 10:2526,916+26
19 Aug 2026, 09:1826,890-4
18 Aug 2026, 09:2226,894-5
17 Aug 2026, 09:3426,899-7
15 Aug 2026, 15:1526,906+22
13 Aug 2026, 23:4726,884+15
12 Aug 2026, 15:3326,869+3
11 Aug 2026, 15:4226,866-1
8 Aug 2026, 23:0126,867-4
6 Aug 2026, 22:3226,871+1
6 Aug 2026, 02:4826,870first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.3%
avg views ÷ 26,927 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,270
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held41 (21 July 202623 August 2026)
Views total225,630
Reactions total3,623
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
997
Videos
306
Links
1,490

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,001 reactions across 40 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,13128.3%
🔥1,02825.7%
👍77019.2%
👏3428.55%
😁2526.30%
❤‍🔥1032.57%
😱771.92%
🤔631.57%
😨370.925%
🙏320.8%
🥰220.55%
🤯180.45%
👀170.425%
160.4%
🎉120.3%
😐100.25%
🤮90.225%
👎60.15%
😢60.15%
🍓50.125%
20 further kinds451.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 41 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vertdider. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC≈3,230 views144 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Video

100 метров за 9,39 секунды🤯 Роботы теперь бегают быстрее человека: 1. Робот 9,39 2. Усэйн Болт 9,58 #ВосстаниеМашин@vertdider

😱73🔥33😁1615👏3🤣3🤔1

22 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC≈3,910 views97 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Video

🌚 NASA опубликовало снимки кратера, который образовался на Луне во время падения отработанной ступени ракеты-носителя Falcon 9. Серия фотографий была сделана узкоугольной камерой аппарата Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) в период с 11 по 12 августа. Сам кратер образовался 5 августа, когда верхняя ступень ракеты SpaceX Falcon 9 врезалась в поверхность после запуска миссии Firefly Blue Ghost 1 в январе 2025 года. Бл

🔥60👍199😁4❤‍🔥2👏2🦄1

21 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC≈4,300 views50 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Ждали задачку? У нас есть! Решайте, присылайте ответ в комментарии и пусть мозг перестроится с работы на выходные. Но помните, что если пойдёте за помощью к нейросетям, то план не сработает...😅 Правильный ответ опубликуем в понедельник. #задачки@vertdider

🤔33👍9👏4🤯2🔥1😁1

19 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC≈5,480 views78 reactions1 Starread 24 August 2026

Posted without readable text

40👍23🔥12👏3

18 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC≈5,940 views204 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Video

🐅Самку амурского тигра по кличке Умит выпустили в заповеднике Иле-Балхаш в Казахстане в рамках программы реинтродукции. Она стала первым тигром в Казахстане после исчезновения местной популяции туранского тигра в 1948 году. «Умит» в переводе с казахского — «надежда», зоологи очень рассчитывают на неё для возрождения вида. Всего в мае 2026 года в Казахстан из Хабаровского края приехали четыре амурских тигра: два взро

🔥11428👏26👍10🥰8❤‍🔥6🤔6🎉4

18 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC≈4,750 views154 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Что может быть лучше двухчасовой лекции по астрофизике от Нила Деграсса Тайсона? Заглядывайте к нам на канал https://youtu.be/e9DrCjnItI0?si

👍81🔥3018😁15❤‍🔥5👏2💯2😐1

17 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC≈5,080 views99 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

🕺Даже самые опасные хищники моря, оказывается, ценят родственные связи. Как показали исследования, акулы-быки, или тупорылые акулы (Carcharhinus leucas), проводят значительное время с членами своей семьи. Ранее считалось, что они — одиночные хищники. Учёные на протяжении шести лет проводили наблюдения за социальным поведением тупорылых акул в морском заповеднике у берегов Фиджи. Полученные данные они сопоставляли с

52👍25🔥13🐳4❤‍🔥2👏1🤔1🤩1

16 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC≈5,510 views94 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Перевод второй части про антиматерию ушёл в озвучку🎙 Спасибо всем за ожидание! А если вдруг пропустили первую серию, ловите ссылочку https://youtu.be/RWduLBP2mTM?si

41🔥31👍19👏3

16 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC≈5,430 views24 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

🗣НАЧИНАЕМ: https://www.youtube.com/live/oyJXIdHPxZ4?si=eD9OiZMJy9J6Hf2l Живой стрим Vert Dider — отслушиваем вместе с вами свежую озвучку видео от канала 3Blue1Brown про нейросети. Приходите!

12🔥7👏4👍1

16 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC≈5,170 views30 reactionsread 24 August 2026

▶️Ребят, уже через час — живой стрим с нашими координатором переводчиков и редакторов Алексеем Маловым и главным редактором Еленой Смотровой! В 13:00 мск на нашем YouTube-канале: https://www.youtube.com/live/oyJXIdHPxZ4?si=eD9OiZMJy9J6Hf2l Ждём вас☺️

15🔥12👏2👍1

15 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC≈5,410 views115 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥7326👍103❤‍🔥2👏1

14 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC≈5,050 views58 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

📣16 августа зовём на новый стрим! В это воскресенье вместе с вами разберём видео от канала 3Blue1Brown про нейросети. Приходите разбираться в нейронах, слоях, весах и смещениях, а также искать оговорки и мелкие неточности в нашей озвучке. Поболтаем, всё поправим и после эфира передадим ролик на доработку. А уже потом он выйдет для всех. Будет интересно! ⏰ 13:00 мск 🗓 16 августа, воскресенье 📱 Заходите на наш You

👏34🔥145👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @vertdider. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@vertdider edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 302,248 of 1,585,759entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Вселенная Плюс
@vselennayaplus · 83,082
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Космос просто
@cosmosprosto · 60,702
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
Неземной телеграм / Астроном Сурдин
@nezemnoy_telegram · 95,830
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q51790394 on Wikidata, read 16 August 2026
LabelVert Dider
Descriptionvolunteer translation project
YouTubeUCY6zVRa3Km52bsBmpyQnk6A
Official sitehttp://vertdider.com

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vert Dider” (@vertdider), 26,927 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vertdider.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.