Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Космос просто

Channel

Космос просто

@cosmosprosto

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

60,854subscribers

+355 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001394375404
TypeChannel
Username@cosmosprosto
DescriptionКанал "Космос просто". https://www.youtube.com/@cosmosprosto A+ Включен в перечень персональных страниц: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/675ad64935130d7236567d76 По рекламе: [email protected] Поддержать: https://boosty.to/cosmosprosto
Created12 February 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cosmosprosto

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

60,49660,86160,678.56 August 2026 — 60,499 subscribers6 August 2026 — 60,496 subscribers7 August 2026 — 60,500 subscribers8 August 2026 — 60,506 subscribers9 August 2026 — 60,510 subscribers10 August 2026 — 60,517 subscribers11 August 2026 — 60,530 subscribers12 August 2026 — 60,560 subscribers13 August 2026 — 60,606 subscribers15 August 2026 — 60,632 subscribers16 August 2026 — 60,649 subscribers17 August 2026 — 60,680 subscribers18 August 2026 — 60,673 subscribers20 August 2026 — 60,684 subscribers21 August 2026 — 60,669 subscribers22 August 2026 — 60,680 subscribers24 August 2026 — 60,702 subscribers25 August 2026 — 60,706 subscribers26 August 2026 — 60,698 subscribers27 August 2026 — 60,707 subscribers28 August 2026 — 60,696 subscribers29 August 2026 — 60,745 subscribers30 August 2026 — 60,743 subscribers31 August 2026 — 60,752 subscribers1 September 2026 — 60,776 subscribers2 September 2026 — 60,773 subscribers3 September 2026 — 60,788 subscribers5 September 2026 — 60,830 subscribers9 September 2026 — 60,861 subscribers11 September 2026 — 60,801 subscribers13 September 2026 — 60,800 subscribers15 September 2026 — 60,805 subscribers17 September 2026 — 60,797 subscribers19 September 2026 — 60,854 subscribers60,8546 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 45 days, net +355. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 60,441–60,916 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 16:3660,854+57
17 Sept 2026, 02:2060,797-8
15 Sept 2026, 04:2160,805+5
13 Sept 2026, 12:4160,800-1
11 Sept 2026, 15:0060,801-60
9 Sept 2026, 02:1860,861+31
5 Sept 2026, 17:5960,830+42
3 Sept 2026, 15:1760,788+15
2 Sept 2026, 08:2260,773-3
1 Sept 2026, 10:0460,776+24
31 Aug 2026, 10:0460,752+9
30 Aug 2026, 09:0360,743-2
29 Aug 2026, 11:4360,745+49
28 Aug 2026, 09:1160,696-11
27 Aug 2026, 06:0560,707+9
26 Aug 2026, 06:0460,698-8
25 Aug 2026, 08:0960,706+4
24 Aug 2026, 04:5860,702+22
22 Aug 2026, 13:5460,680+11
21 Aug 2026, 03:4260,669first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.2%
avg views ÷ 60,854 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,100
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held57 (25 July 202622 September 2026)
Views total496,900
Reactions total16,897
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 14:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,680
Videos
160
Links
652

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 05s
Average length
1m 11s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

33,391 reactions across 55 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16,35849.0%
🔥9,72529.1%
👍5,62616.8%
😱9182.75%
🤔3931.18%
🤣2510.752%
💩610.183%
👎590.177%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34,271 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
138
across the posts below
Posts paid on
49
of 57 we hold a reading for · 86%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cosmosprosto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 57 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.75%
1 of 57 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
17,800
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
18,000
over 56 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvycR7J19 September 20269 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

22 Sept 2026, 09:05 UTC≈6,910 views538 reactions1 Starread 22 September 2026
Photo

Невероятное совпадение! Астрофотограф Петр Хоралек (Petr Horalek) снимал транзит Международной космической станции по диску Солнца, и в этот момент перед Солнцем пролетел самолет. По оценке фотографа, шанс на такое случайное совпадение — 1 к 30 миллионам!

🔥37095👍60😱13

21 Sept 2026, 06:24 UTC≈9,890 views473 reactions2 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Асинхронная галактика. Это изображение спиральной галактики NGC 4698, полученное телескопом «Хаббл». Она удалена от нас на 55 миллионов световых лет и находится в скоплении Девы. На первый взгляд может показаться, что это обычная спиральная галактика. Но если приглядеться, даже на этом снимке можно заметить интересные черты. Во-первых, спиральные рукава сильно ослабевают к центру галактики, и вот во внешних региона

271👍105🔥87🤔10

19 Sept 2026, 07:55 UTC≈12,500 views442 reactions2 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Туманность Полумесяц (NGC 6888) Невероятное изображение туманности от астрофотографа Кевина Бордмана. Суммарное время накопления сигнала — 17 часов 30 минут. Изображение композитное. Съёмка велась отдельно с узкополосными фильтрами H-альфа (оранжево-красные цвета, 6 часов 20 минут) и O III (дважды ионизированный кислород, голубой цвет на изображении, 5 часов 40 минут). Плюс 5 с половиной часов RGB-съёмки и отдельн

264👍105🔥69😱2👎1🤔1

18 Sept 2026, 07:45 UTC≈13,400 views538 reactions3 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

След на Марсе. Марсоход «Персеверанс» обнаружил на Марсе необычное образование, которое по характеру вмятины немного напоминает отпечаток стопы. Образование небольшое — всего около 1 сантиметра в поперечнике. Небольшие ямки на Марсе находили и ранее. Они могут быть вмятинами, оставленными камнями, которые потом были разрушены эрозией. Но эта новая находка отличается от таких ямок. Она более плоская и широкая. Пока т

263🤔108🤣94👍42🔥27😱4

17 Sept 2026, 08:01 UTC≈14,800 views425 reactions2 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Самые странные состояния материи https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP_Z13ZJHo0 Все привыкли к трём классическим состояниям вещества. Или четырём, если учесть плазму. Но можно найти списки, в которых 5, 7, 9 и даже больше состояний материи. В этом видео мы поговорим о том, в каких необычных состояниях вещество может находиться во Вселенной. Кроме Ютуба: 1) Этот НОВЫЙ выпуск еще можно посмотреть ПРЯМО СЕЙЧАС без рекл

🔥25483👍83😱3🤔2

16 Sept 2026, 10:21 UTC≈14,900 views455 reactions3 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Дюнные поля на Марсе. Снимки дюн на Марсе, сделанные аппаратом MRO камерой HiRISE. Первый чёрно-белый снимок — большого участка поля дюн внутри безымянного кратера, второе изображение — фрагмент того же изображения, но более крупным планом. При наблюдении глазами дюны не были бы фиолетовыми — это комбинация наблюдений в инфракрасном, красном и синем фильтрах. А на третьем изображении на общую карту наложен цветной у

283👍106🔥61🤔4👎1

15 Sept 2026, 12:36 UTC≈15,200 views693 reactions2 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Невероятный снимок грузового корабля «Прогресс МС-31» на фоне ночной стороны Земли и градиента атмосферы, подсвеченной заходящим Солнцем.

406🔥181👍96😱8👎1🤣1

14 Sept 2026, 08:48 UTC≈17,400 views507 reactions3 Starsread 22 September 2026
Video

8 лет на пути к Меркурию. Невероятное таймлапс-видео, которое сжимает до 4 минут восьмилетний полёт миссии «БепиКоломбо» к Меркурию. За это время аппарат (по прибытии он разделится на два) преодолел почти 10 миллиардов километров и совершил 9 пролётов у планет — гравитационных манёвров: у Земли, Венеры и самого Меркурия. Все эти пролёты хорошо видны на видео. О том, почему аппараты не «летят по прямой», а наворачи

289🔥134👍76🤔6👎1😱1

13 Sept 2026, 08:08 UTC≈16,800 views724 reactions5 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Сфотографировал сверхновую в галактике NGC 7331 Слева — мой снимок, сделанный телескопом Seestar S50, справа — снимок этой же области, сделанный в другое время (не мной). Сейчас вблизи центра галактики видно звезду, которой нет на снимке справа. Это взорвавшийся белый карлик, который перетягивал на себя массу звезды-компаньона, что привело к термоядерному взрыву, который видно с расстояния в десятки миллионов светов

377🔥234👍94😱18🤔1

12 Sept 2026, 08:16 UTC≈17,100 views580 reactions1 Starread 22 September 2026
Photo

НЛО? Загадочный треугольник в небе. На самом деле, конечно, это ни «Н», ни «Л». Объекты вполне себе опознанные, ну и не летающие — по крайней мере, не в нашей атмосфере. Люди часто путают планеты с неопознанными объектами. Когда на еще светлом небе после заката ещё нет ни одной звезды, но уже ярко светит Венера, она кажется им странным объектом. Юпитеру тоже иногда достается. Ну а если бы люди увидели такой треуго

345🔥138👍73🤣15🤔6😱3

11 Sept 2026, 11:47 UTC≈16,500 views110 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Настоящий веб-мастер ответит на эти 10 вопросов без ИИ. А ты? 🎉 В этом году SpaceWeb — 25 лет! SpaceWeb — это старейших хостинг-провайдеров в России, который прошёл путь от одного сайта на ретро-компьютере до 222 000 веб-проектов и более 40 хостинговых и облачных сервисов. В честь юбилея компания устраивает праздничный квиз, так что проверь свои знания в юбилейном тесте из 10 вопросов и выиграй мерч! 🎁 А промокод

45🤣24👍20👎11🔥10

11 Sept 2026, 06:14 UTC≈18,200 views876 reactions4 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Полосы затмения Классное композитное изображение, на котором показаны разные этапы солнечного затмения 12 августа этого года. Затмение было на закате, так что небо еще меняется благодаря постепенному заходу Солнца. Изображение охватывает период примерно в 2 часа. Автор: Javier Castro

530🔥228👍113🤔5

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @cosmosprosto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Улица Шкловского - Астрономия и Космонавтика
@ShklovskyStr · 19,088
#1
Space Room | Космос
@inSpaceRoom · 10,857
#2
Вселенная Плюс
@vselennayaplus · 83,091
#3
Физика от Побединского
@physfrompobed · 25,937
#4
Kosmo
@kosmo_off · 90,124
#5
Неземной телеграм / Астроном Сурдин
@nezemnoy_telegram · 96,287
#6
Astro Channel
@astro_channel · 9,924
#7
QWERTY
@qwerty_live · 21,603
#8
Пушка | Передний край науки и технологий
@sci_one_tv · 15,944
#9
Тайны Космоса 🔭
@mycosmos · 131,200
#10
James Webb Space Telescope
@JamesWebbTelescope · 11,630
#11
AstroAlert | Наблюдательная астрономия
@astroalert · 46,558
#12
НАУЧ ПОП
@sergei_nauchpop · 4,981
#13
astronomy
@tirsky · 8,408
#14
Space Room 🎥 Видео
@spaceroom_video · 2,014
#15
SciTopus – Наука и научпоп
@SciTopus · 10,028
#16
Rings & Moons
@RingsandMoons · 5,715
#17
НаукаPRO
@naukaproo · 9,201
#18
Zelenyikot и космос
@egorovkot · 17,859
#19
Utopia Show
@topapopa · 368,504
#20
Двач
@dvachannel · 938,773
#21
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,121,201
#22
DS ASTRO🌚
@dsastro2 · 3,925
#23
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,971,693
#24
[BadComedian]
@TheBadComedian · 600,761
#25
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 494,224
#26
Rozetked
@rozetked · 656,361
#27
Ньюсач/Двач
@ru2ch · 650,396
#28
🦖 Упоротый Палеонтолог 🦕(Дмитрий Соболев)🐊
@crazypaleo · 13,932
#29
ТОПЛЕС
@toplesofficial · 511,065
#30
r/ретранслятор
@retra · 165,509
#31
Лентач
@lentachold · 392,921
#32
СТАС БОМБИТ
@ikakprosto · 326,616
#33
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 838,100
#34
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,041,128
#35
PRO Hi-Tech
@prohitec · 69,701
#36
Открытый космос
@ourspacelive · 3,807
#37
UsachevRuslan
@usachevruslan · 199,008
#38
Макар Светлый
@makarsvet13 · 3,818
#39
Ateo Breaking
@ateobreaking · 694,274
#40
Fighterbomber
@bomber_fighter · 527,852
#41
Дудь
@yurydud · 864,661
#42
Александр Панчин
@ScienceInquisition · 49,363
#43
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 968,245
#44
Лаборатория Научных Видео
@ScienceVideoLab · 5,568
#45
КБ
@cbpub · 644,640
#46
Vert Dider
@vertdider · 26,948
#47
Злой Крастер
@angrycrust · 123,987
#48
N + 1
@nplusone · 64,280
#49
Крупнокалиберный Переполох
@bolshiepushki · 325,501
#50
Записки астронома
@astrozapiski · 3,465
#51
АНТРОПОГЕНЕЗ.RU
@antropogenez_ru · 36,383
#52
Бэкдор
@whackdoor · 1,603,481
#53
Redroom Text
@redroomtext · 75,961
#54
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,690
#55
NN
@naebnet · 2,172,222
#56
Быть Или
@ToBeOr_Official · 303,514
#57
Илья Яшин
@yashin_russia · 136,933
#58
Клим Жуков
@klimzhukoff · 138,325
#59
Naked Science
@nsmag · 191,976
#60
Максим Кац
@maximkatz · 161,200
#61
Землякова
@ozeml · 1,203
#62
Код.ру
@d_code · 404,952
#63
SpaceX
@spacex_rus · 16,909
#64
SVTV NEWS — Либертарианское СМИ
@svtvnews · 113,037
#65
Химия – Просто
@ChemistryEasy · 25,134
#66
Пикабу
@pikabu · 256,113
#67
AlexGyver 🛠 Channel
@alexgyvershow · 78,191
#68
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,061,005
#69
Mash
@mash · 3,096,804
#70
Анатолий Шарий
@asupersharij · 1,700,527
#71
Алексей Шевцов
@jolybells · 358,951
#72
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
@yurasumy · 2,672,095
#73
sndk
@sndkgram · 357,088
#74
Пекарня
@pekagame · 1,091,300
#75
Пездуза
@pezduzalive · 372,470
#76
nerds
@nerds · 415,438
#77
Thoisoi
@TheThoisoi · 45,321
#78
Вестник Шевцова
@jolynews · 208,388
#79
Colonelcassad
@boris_rozhin · 747,495
#80
ВИЛСАКОМ РЕД / WYLSACOM RED
@wylsared · 1,094,211
#81
Kuplinov ► Play
@Kuplinov_Telegram · 913,893
#82
Макаренков об играх
@makarenkoff_games · 28,589
#83
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 303,468
#84
Дмитрий Медведев
@medvedev_telegram · 1,700,869
#85
Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 137,325
#86
Reddit
@Reddit · 162,484
#87
Лентач
@oldlentach · 261,296
#88
VG/Двач
@ru2chvg · 182,024
#89
Александр Штефанов
@alexandrshtefanov · 191,276
#90
твиттота
@twitt_ota · 332,521
#91
Накипело. Майкл Наки
@Nackepelo · 212,531
#92
Свежая Булдка
@buldj · 86,022
#93
Жизнь насекомых
@insect_life · 192,024
#94

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Физика от Побединского
@physfrompobed · 25,937
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
Kosmo
@kosmo_off · 90,124
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
Неземной телеграм / Астроном Сурдин
@nezemnoy_telegram · 96,287
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
Вселенная Плюс
@vselennayaplus · 83,091
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Астрофизика с Тим
@kosmos_int · 56,151
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 August 2026
Kosmos Time | Наука | Физика
@kosmostime · 63,555
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
AstroAlert | Наблюдательная астрономия
@astroalert · 46,558
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
Тайны Космоса 🔭
@mycosmos · 131,200
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
NASA | Физика | Астрономия
@kosmos149 · 88,056
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
Мир Космоса
@kosmos_go · 36,774
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
Vert Dider
@vertdider · 26,948
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
АНТРОПОГЕНЕЗ.RU
@antropogenez_ru · 36,383
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Наука
@naukatv_ru · 23,557
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
GEO
@GEOSHOW · 77,701
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
Химия – Просто
@ChemistryEasy · 25,134
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
Thoisoi
@TheThoisoi · 45,321
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
Александр Панчин
@ScienceInquisition · 49,363
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Грег
@gregjgeek · 23,220
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 September 2026
Fun Science
@funscience · 34,394
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
Мудреныч
@moodrenych · 25,523
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
Dagon
@dagon_official · 25,781
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
CombatCrew 🚜
@combatcrew · 68,408
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 August 2026
#энерголикбез
@operby · 35,699
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Космос просто” (@cosmosprosto), 60,854 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cosmosprosto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.