Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Astro Channel

Channel

Astro Channel

@astro_channel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,924subscribers

+91 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001041945586
TypeChannel
Username@astro_channel
CreatedBetween 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/astro_channel

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,8339,9249,878.57 August 2026 — 9,833 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,833 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,835 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,860 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,869 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,871 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,876 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,886 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,899 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,906 subscribers8 September 2026 — 9,908 subscribers12 September 2026 — 9,916 subscribers16 September 2026 — 9,924 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 40 days, net +91. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,819–9,938 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 16:599,924+8
12 Sept 2026, 13:189,916+8
8 Sept 2026, 04:579,908+2
3 Sept 2026, 09:539,906+7
30 Aug 2026, 20:569,899+13
28 Aug 2026, 00:349,886+10
24 Aug 2026, 19:139,876+5
21 Aug 2026, 03:029,871+2
17 Aug 2026, 23:389,869+9
14 Aug 2026, 15:169,860+25
11 Aug 2026, 08:249,835+2
7 Aug 2026, 06:009,833no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:539,833first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.9%
avg views ÷ 9,924 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,170
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held32 (16 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total6,510
Reactions total473
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4,054 reactions across 32 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,68441.5%
👍82720.4%
🔥50812.5%
❤‍🔥2917.18%
1804.44%
🤣1714.22%
😢1032.54%
😁942.32%
501.23%
🤓180.444%
🐳140.345%
👀140.345%
😎130.321%
🆒100.247%
🤩100.247%
90.222%
🍾80.197%
💊80.197%
💋80.197%
🤬60.148%
11 further kinds280.691%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,054 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 32 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @astro_channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 18:57 UTC≈1,900 views98 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Утром (по московскому времени) 28 августа состоится почти полное лунное затмение! Будет ли видно у вас - проверяйте по этой карте. А также подробнее об этом явлении я рассказывал на стриме.

53🔥22👍17🥱4❤‍🔥2

27 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC≈1,760 views163 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Кажется, не очень удачно столик поставил 😂

🤣119😁28113🗿2

26 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC≈2,850 views212 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🌟В созвездии Стрелы вспыхнула яркая Новая звезда! Сейчас ее блеск на уровне 7m! И она доступна для небольших биноклей, не смотря на почти полную Луну! Также звезду можно сфотографировать даже на смартфон. Координаты объекта: 19 45 06.49 +18 22 42.2 Наблюдайте!

125🔥51👍27❤‍🔥8🤔1

23 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC≈3,370 views154 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

Дмитрий Зигфридович Вибе сегодня выступал в Бишкеке

83👍56❤‍🔥13👏1🤩1

21 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC≈3,600 views124 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @ShklovskyStr

Posted without readable text

😢101👍964😭4

16 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC≈4,220 views232 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @astro_maximumPhoto

T O T A L I T Y Диск Луны стремительно наползал на Солнце, свет становился всё более сумрачным, а тени на земле всё резче. И вот исчез последний луч прямого солнечного света. Всего в 3° над горизонтом возникла настоящая «дыра» в небе! Закатные цвета окрасили золотом солнечную корону, самую внешнюю и раскалённую часть атмосферы Солнца, которая обычно кажется белой. От этого зрелище стало ещё фантастичнее: казалось,

127🔥71👍20❤‍🔥12🤬2

15 Aug 2026, 18:57 UTC≈4,150 views171 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

Помним и по-прежнему вдохновляемся!

125❤‍🔥29😎11🤬42

13 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTC≈4,780 views177 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Хороша, чертовка! Это комета 220Р/МакНота прямо сейчас. Только что показывал ее на стриме

❤‍🔥107👍46🔥17🍓52

13 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC≈4,870 views94 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Друзья! Если сегодня обойдется без факапов, то снова потранслирую ПЕРСЕИДЫ. Вэлком на стрим! Начну в 21:00 - 21:30 (по мск), возможны небольшие корректировки по времени https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpznBrD1dPg

54👍3171🥴1

13 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC≈4,250 views72 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

Саундтрек к вчерашнему стриму Персеид 😂

🤣50😁153❤‍🔥2🤪2

13 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC≈4,260 views142 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @astro_maximumPhoto

Доберусь до обработки не раньше чем послезавтра, так что пока немного спойлерну скринами🫡 А вы присылайте в комментарии свои работы 🙌🏼

84👍41❤‍🔥11🐳5😱1

12 Aug 2026, 22:42 UTC≈2,880 views97 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

57👍22🔥16🤣2

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @astro_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

AstroAlert | Наблюдательная астрономия
@astroalert · 46,558
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
Неземной телеграм / Астроном Сурдин
@nezemnoy_telegram · 96,287
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
Космос просто
@cosmosprosto · 60,854
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
Kosmo
@kosmo_off · 90,124
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
Физика от Побединского
@physfrompobed · 25,937
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
Вселенная Плюс
@vselennayaplus · 83,091
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Мир Космоса
@kosmos_go · 36,774
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
NASA | Физика | Астрономия
@kosmos149 · 88,056
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
QWERTY
@qwerty_live · 21,603
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
Olegmks
@oleg_mks · 23,921
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
Астрофизика с Тим
@kosmos_int · 56,151
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 August 2026
Fun Science
@funscience · 34,394
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
Химия – Просто
@ChemistryEasy · 25,134
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
ПостНаука
@postnauka · 21,574
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 September 2026
Vert Dider
@vertdider · 26,948
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
АНТРОПОГЕНЕЗ.RU
@antropogenez_ru · 36,383
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Доктор Утин
@doctorutin · 24,543
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 September 2026
Thoisoi
@TheThoisoi · 45,321
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Astro Channel” (@astro_channel), 9,924 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/astro_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.