Блог AlexGyver: мемы, новости из мира Arduino и электроники и другие интересности
- Наш чат: https://t.me/AlexGyverChat
- Реклама: [email protected]
- Личная почта: [email protected]
- Предложка: @alexgyvershow_bot
Created
7 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 92 days, net +195. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77,899–78,229 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 01:15
78,132
+44
4 Nov 2026, 23:44
78,088
+43
3 Nov 2026, 20:31
78,045
+50
2 Nov 2026, 16:50
77,995
+37
1 Nov 2026, 15:34
77,958
-8
31 Oct 2026, 17:29
77,966
-6
30 Oct 2026, 14:10
77,972
-19
29 Oct 2026, 13:59
77,991
-27
28 Oct 2026, 13:14
78,018
-8
27 Oct 2026, 13:15
78,026
-19
26 Oct 2026, 14:25
78,045
-14
25 Oct 2026, 15:59
78,059
-15
24 Oct 2026, 17:31
78,074
-7
23 Oct 2026, 17:59
78,081
-11
22 Oct 2026, 18:39
78,092
-2
21 Oct 2026, 10:50
78,094
-2
20 Oct 2026, 11:06
78,096
+14
19 Oct 2026, 09:07
78,082
+7
18 Oct 2026, 09:38
78,075
+3
17 Oct 2026, 10:46
78,072
first reading
Engagement
59 posts held, back to 19 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 186 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
50.2%
avg views ÷ 78,132 subscribers
Avg views / post
39,200
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 59 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
59 (19 May 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
549,180
Reactions total
9,207
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 19:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
567
Videos
75
Links
220
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 07s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
51,322 reactions across 59 posts, in 63 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
9,400
18.3%
😁
8,981
17.5%
🤣
8,760
17.1%
👍
6,216
12.1%
❤
4,352
8.48%
💩
2,910
5.67%
🤔
1,830
3.57%
🤯
1,498
2.92%
👎
1,113
2.17%
🤡
1,044
2.03%
😱
674
1.31%
🍌
634
1.24%
🤮
543
1.06%
🫡
444
0.865%
😭
341
0.664%
❤🔥
315
0.614%
👀
278
0.542%
💯
242
0.472%
😎
218
0.425%
🌭
155
0.302%
43 further kinds
1,374
2.68%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51,322 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
205
across the posts below
Posts paid on
35
of 59 we hold a reading for · 59%
Most on one post
29
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alexgyvershow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 59 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 May 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (14.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Любой хороший проект начинается с грамотного распределения ресурсов. А свободные финансы - тоже ресурс, который можно использовать с пользой и получать с него доход, вместо того чтобы просто держать "на карте".
Для этого важно начать с выбора надежного финансового сервиса. Например, у МТС есть сервис «МТС Накопления», который позволяет хранить деньги и получать высокий доход каждый день прямо в приложении Мой МТС. В…
Огромное спасибо ребят! (не смог найти кому конкретно, видимо бот удалил ссылку). Многие писали про "сделать самоделку". Это было на крайний случай, потому что магазинные часы стоят как сама ардуина и работают от батарейки год-два. Самоделка обойдётся в разы дороже, будет выглядеть как самоделка и её придётся часто заряжать, вот и всё
народ, есть у кого нибудь на примете конкретная модель настольных часов с почасовым сигналом? Желательно чтобы диапазон настраивался или был фиксированным условно с утра до вечера. Или фотка чтобы найти на алике например. Наручные casio не предлагать, они всю ночь пипипикают
Попросил думателя нарисовать картинку, как бы могло выглядеть "макеточное" подключение всех компонентов на плате моего обучающего робота. И это тут ещё пары компонентов не хватает... В общем на макетке такое собирать - это что то на грани нервного расстройства 😁 на самой плате показывает 12 метров дорожек, без учёта GND. В общем это будет стартовый набор на колёсах, ожидайте
Как часто вы перезагружаете роутер? Я уже давно понял, что если частые сбои интернета начинают исправляться перезагрузкой роутера - его просто пора выбросить и купить новый, обычно в этих случаях сброс и обновление прошивки уже не помогают. Даже если ваш старый роутер работает нормально - он скорее всего устарел по другим параметрам и технологиям, например по скорости, версии WiFi, количеству одновременно подключенны…
Это рендер? Это нейросеть? Нет, это наконец то рабочий прототип робота машинки, у которого на борту что-то около 50-ти устройств (управление, датчики, индикация). И их можно почти одновременно подключить к микроконтроллеру благодаря встроенным расширителям и другим трюкам 😬
Продолжаю эксперименты со сваркой! На этот раз сравнил электродную сварку с полуавтоматом без газа. Напоминаю, опыта в сварке нет, но есть современный сварочный аппарат, т.е. сценарий "новичок купил аппарат и пробует варить". Благодаря антизалипанию, горячему старту и форсажу дуги, варить электродом у меня в целом даже получилось, но результат ни в какое сравнение не идёт с полуавтоматом (честно, я старался 🫣). Работ…
Нашёл несколько прикольных инструментов с Алишки, но немного. Делаем обзорчик к распродаже?
Делаем77%
Не делаем4%
пук32%
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
💯180🐳30👀17😁8🌭6❤4👎4⚡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @alexgyvershow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Нашёл несколько прикольных инструментов с Алишки, но немного. Делаем обзорчик к распродаже?
Делаем77%
Не делаем4%
пук32%
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какой бы вы хотели набор? С полностью готовой платой, или паять все эти микросхемы-резисторы самому?
Собранная плата12%
Соберу сам (выводные компоненты)34%
Соберу сам (SMD компоненты)18%
Я банан35%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Игорь Негода @igornegodastartuem · 38,683 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
NatashkaPLUS @NatashkaPLUS · 57,626 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 23 August 2026
Весёлый Электронщик @radiolubitelTV · 21,406 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 September 2026
K3D.tech // Dmitry Sorkin @dsorkin · 22,175 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 September 2026
Лихой ТопорЪ @lihojtoporofficial · 51,908 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
Злой Крастер @angrycrust · 123,017 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
GORDEEN @gordeen · 18,964 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 5 October 2026
KREOSAN @KREOSAN_vlog · 56,819 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 19 September 2026
МАШИНАТОРЫ @mashinatory · 68,379 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
#энерголикбез @operby · 35,893 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
Сообщество продвинутых мастеров @freechannelfixerplus · 37,569 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 4 September 2026
Будни сантехника 😉 @budnisantehnlka · 32,734 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 5 September 2026
3DMP | 3д печать | 3d принтер @morozprint · 40,642 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 30 August 2026
DeezLab @DesigningLaaab · 23,730 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 17 September 2026
Умный дом с Alex Kvazis @AlexKvazis · 23,539 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 September 2026
ЗЕМСТАНДАРТ @zems · 48,223 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
THUJOY @TheThujoy · 25,983 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
Команда АП @KomandaAP · 146,108 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
Деревенский блокнот. Официальный канал @derbloknot · 19,466 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 1 October 2026
SlivkiShow - Official @slivkishow_youtube · 77,616 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 September 2026
Физика от Побединского @physfrompobed · 27,253 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
Гараж 54 @Garage54official · 467,345 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 14 August 2026
CombatCrew 🚜 @combatcrew · 68,531 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 August 2026
ВАЛ channel @val_channel · 36,623 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 45 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AlexGyver 🛠 Channel” (@alexgyvershow), 78,132 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alexgyvershow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.