Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IT Юмор

Channel

IT Юмор

@ithumor

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

60,231subscribers

-686 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001057408216
TypeChannel
Username@ithumor
DescriptionМемы для программистов Разместить рекламу: @tproger_sales_bot Правила общения: tprg.ru/rules Другие каналы: @tproger_channels Сайт: tprg.ru/site Другие наши проекты: tprg.ru/media Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://tprg.ru/r7VH
Created26 April 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 October 2026
Measurements held46
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/ithumor

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

60,23160,93360,5825 August 2026 — 60,917 subscribers6 August 2026 — 60,917 subscribers6 August 2026 — 60,920 subscribers7 August 2026 — 60,926 subscribers8 August 2026 — 60,931 subscribers9 August 2026 — 60,909 subscribers11 August 2026 — 60,933 subscribers12 August 2026 — 60,930 subscribers13 August 2026 — 60,811 subscribers14 August 2026 — 60,740 subscribers16 August 2026 — 60,732 subscribers17 August 2026 — 60,719 subscribers18 August 2026 — 60,713 subscribers19 August 2026 — 60,687 subscribers20 August 2026 — 60,676 subscribers21 August 2026 — 60,678 subscribers23 August 2026 — 60,679 subscribers25 August 2026 — 60,652 subscribers25 August 2026 — 60,635 subscribers26 August 2026 — 60,638 subscribers28 August 2026 — 60,641 subscribers29 August 2026 — 60,656 subscribers30 August 2026 — 60,646 subscribers31 August 2026 — 60,648 subscribers1 September 2026 — 60,649 subscribers2 September 2026 — 60,660 subscribers3 September 2026 — 60,712 subscribers5 September 2026 — 60,753 subscribers9 September 2026 — 60,833 subscribers11 September 2026 — 60,552 subscribers13 September 2026 — 60,518 subscribers15 September 2026 — 60,493 subscribers16 September 2026 — 60,503 subscribers19 September 2026 — 60,490 subscribers25 September 2026 — 60,568 subscribers4 October 2026 — 60,541 subscribers8 October 2026 — 60,466 subscribers13 October 2026 — 60,327 subscribers15 October 2026 — 60,315 subscribers16 October 2026 — 60,312 subscribers17 October 2026 — 60,300 subscribers18 October 2026 — 60,282 subscribers19 October 2026 — 60,270 subscribers20 October 2026 — 60,260 subscribers21 October 2026 — 60,238 subscribers22 October 2026 — 60,231 subscribers5 August 202622 October 2026
46 measurements spanning 78 days, net -686. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 60,126–61,038 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 46
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Oct 2026, 18:4960,231-7
21 Oct 2026, 16:1560,238-22
20 Oct 2026, 12:5660,260-10
19 Oct 2026, 15:0760,270-12
18 Oct 2026, 16:2860,282-18
17 Oct 2026, 15:3860,300-12
16 Oct 2026, 17:0560,312-3
15 Oct 2026, 15:5160,315-12
13 Oct 2026, 05:3060,327-139
8 Oct 2026, 21:5460,466-75
4 Oct 2026, 11:0060,541-27
25 Sept 2026, 20:4160,568+78
19 Sept 2026, 04:5660,490-13
16 Sept 2026, 20:1660,503+10
15 Sept 2026, 01:3860,493-25
13 Sept 2026, 08:1860,518-34
11 Sept 2026, 14:5860,552-281
9 Sept 2026, 02:1560,833+80
5 Sept 2026, 18:1760,753+41
3 Sept 2026, 15:1860,712first reading

Engagement

398 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 157 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.1%
avg views ÷ 60,231 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,730
154 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
154
of 398 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026
Posts held398 (2 August 2026 – 23 October 2026)
Views total1,497,910
Reactions total19,590
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Oct 2026, 08:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈9,510
Videos
≈907
Links
≈5,220

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 13s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

49,945 reactions across 389 posts, in 66 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁27,42754.9%
🤣6,51413.0%
💯3,5427.09%
❤2,7115.43%
😭1,1642.33%
👍8441.69%
🔥8201.64%
😢8051.61%
🌚4320.865%
🤔4130.827%
❤‍🔥3770.755%
👎3500.701%
💊3260.653%
☃3080.617%
🫡2680.537%
✍2270.454%
🗿2070.414%
🥱1950.39%
🤪1690.338%
🤝1670.334%
46 further kinds2,6795.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 398 of the 398 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51,295 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 398 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 23 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 398 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ithumor. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 398 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 23 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.503%
2 of 398 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
9,480
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
10,300
over 396 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFG2CjE1112 August 202612 August 2026
2W5zFJrVGHw124 September 202624 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 398 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 23 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

23 Oct 2026, 08:34 UTC≈1,590 views48 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣37❤4😁3😱3😨1

23 Oct 2026, 05:05 UTC≈5,110 views72 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😢54🫡8❤‍🔥5🤣3❤2

22 Oct 2026, 18:45 UTC≈7,070 views74 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁61🤔7❤4🥱2

22 Oct 2026, 15:25 UTC≈7,610 views42 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁42

22 Oct 2026, 11:49 UTC≈8,330 views95 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁82☃6❤3🎅3🎉1

22 Oct 2026, 08:33 UTC≈9,100 views221 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣186😁15☃10❤3🐳3👌2💯2

22 Oct 2026, 05:11 UTC≈8,860 views119 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁114❤2🌭1💅1💯1

21 Oct 2026, 18:55 UTC≈9,100 views107 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁93❤9💯4💊1

21 Oct 2026, 15:24 UTC≈9,250 views86 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥41🫡21😁17💯4❤3

21 Oct 2026, 12:31 UTC≈9,470 views152 reactions1 Starread 23 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🫡86😁51🌚7🤣4❤3👍1

21 Oct 2026, 08:14 UTC≈9,700 views135 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁124🥱5❤3✍1😍1😭1

21 Oct 2026, 05:13 UTC≈9,910 views161 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁152❤4🫡3💯1🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 398 posts we hold for @ithumor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTCAnonymous Poll1,850 voters approx.

Приходится ли вам копипастить данные и какие именно, когда переходите из одной нейросети в другую?

  1. Код18%
  2. Описание задачи28%
  3. Документацию14%
  4. Результаты работы17%
  5. Настройки и контекст: историю чатов, промпты, скиллы19%
  6. Ничего, использую один инструмент51%

The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Oct 2026, 15:20 UTCAnonymous Poll3,010 voters approx.

Какими ИИ-ассистентами и агентами вы пользуетесь? Можно выбрать несколько

  1. GitHub Copilot8%
  2. Codeium1%
  3. Claude Code47%
  4. Gemini24%
  5. ChatGPT48%
  6. GigaCode (Сбер)4%
  7. Yandex Code Assistant2%
  8. DeepSeek29%
  9. Hermes Agent5%
  10. Другое (напишу в комментариях)12%

The shares total 180%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 398 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 23 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Типичный программист
@tproger · 78,018
#1
Programmer & IT Memes
@itmemes · 122,383
#2
Говнокод
@g_code · 14,843
#3
Хабр
@habr_com · 133,496
#4
r/ретранслятор
@retra · 165,721
#5
Programmer memes
@programmer_memes · 50,820
#6
Rozetked
@rozetked · 655,057
#7
The After Times
@theaftertimes · 16,853
#8
Код.ру
@d_code · 405,439
#9
Веб-страница
@tproger_web · 22,271
#10
Reddit
@Reddit · 161,448
#11
Лепра
@Lepragram · 341,482
#12
Рабы галерные
@rabynagalerah · 8,697
#13
Продакшн
@prod_one · 2,744
#14
Представляешь,
@your_tech · 8,632
#15
localhost
@localhost_public · 16,712
#16
Библиотека IT-мемов
@itmemlib · 9,489
#17
Кодоголик
@kodogolik · 4,243
#18
Библиотека программиста
@proglibrary · 77,945
#19
Типичный Сисадмин
@sysodmins · 39,917
#20
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 970,409
#21
IT-Мемасы от Эникея
@itmemas · 10,119
#22
🦖 Айти Тудэй 🦥
@ithueti · 8,564
#23
Мобильная разработка
@mobi_dev · 13,080
#24
I’m CEO, beach
@imceobeach · 65,228
#25
Java Memes → АйТи мемес
@java_memes · 6,135
#26
CodeCamp
@codecamp · 178,603
#27
Пещера Айтишника
@itpeshchera · 7,287
#28
vc.ru
@vcnews · 112,138
#29
Программист от бога
@godindev · 6,829
#30
IT Папа
@it_dad · 4,080
#31
Clean Code
@codeclean · 11,981
#32
GitHub Community
@github · 155,111
#33
Мамкин программист
@mamprog · 4,274
#34
Tester of QA
@testerofqa · 7,615
#35
ЖЮ 🧡 Videos
@lifeyt · 328,885
#36
уволено
@avansanebudet · 67,271
#37
QA Юмор
@qahumor · 6,186
#38
1337
@media1337 · 1,118,962
#39
Zen of Python
@zen_of_python · 18,760
#40
Рестарт
@remedia · 677,840
#41
Инструменты программиста
@prog_tools · 12,920
#42
DevHumor
@devhumor_tg · 13,458
#43
Двач
@dvachannel · 972,361
#44
THINGS PROGRAMMERS DO
@thingsprogrammersdo · 15,956
#45
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,342
#46
твиттота
@twitt_ota · 329,608
#47
Ньюсач/Двач
@ru2ch · 712,445
#48
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,009,695
#49
Лентач
@lentachold · 392,468
#50
Пикабу
@pikabu · 255,028
#51
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,639,962
#52
Yaplakal.com
@yaplakal · 420,407
#53
Пекарня
@pekagame · 1,122,111
#54
Бэкдор
@whackdoor · 1,560,723
#55
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,119,942
#56
🌚Пятисотые на проде😱
@code500 · 10,776
#57
Лентач
@oldlentach · 263,298
#58
ДЕВОПСИНА | DevOps | Linux
@devopsina · 23,587
#59
NOP::Humor
@nophumor · 7,543
#60
КБ
@cbpub · 670,089
#61
ВИЛСАКОМ РЕД / WYLSACOM RED
@wylsared · 1,099,411
#62
Программист
@progeri · 15,074
#63
MDK
@mudak · 527,299
#64
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 866,626
#65
VG/Двач
@ru2chvg · 181,562
#66
Минцифры России
@mintsifry · 233,373
#67
Пездуза
@pezduzalive · 370,256
#68
Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 138,562
#69
4chan
@ru4chan · 183,836
#70
addmeto
@addmeto · 71,886
#71
NN
@naebnet · 2,193,304
#72
Игорь, начинайте работу
@oplata_skoro_budet · 581,603
#73
[BadComedian]
@TheBadComedian · 605,700
#74
NEXTA Live
@nexta_live · 769,984
#75
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,819
#76
СТАС БОМБИТ
@ikakprosto · 324,251
#77
Big Geek
@biggeekru · 600,201
#78
Сталингулаг
@stalin_gulag · 298,999
#79
Кинопоиск | Фильмы и сериалы
@kinopoisk · 798,930
#80
КБ. экономика
@cb_economics · 366,357
#81
Адовый UX
@uxfromhell · 50,312
#82
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,599
#83
Mash
@mash · 3,143,186
#84
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,061,337
#85
Уголок программиста
@conhum · 20,535
#86
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,560,376
#87
Банкста
@banksta · 438,621
#88
DTF
@dtfbest · 57,862
#89
Дудь
@yurydud · 854,428
#90
Алексей Шевцов
@jolybells · 358,267
#91
Dankest Memes // Данкест Мемс
@thedankestmemes · 46,295
#92
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 491,731
#93
Лука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 430,874
#94

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Типичный программист
@tproger · 78,018
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
Веб-страница
@tproger_web · 22,271
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 September 2026
Programmer memes
@programmer_memes · 50,820
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
Programmer & IT Memes
@itmemes · 122,383
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
I’m CTO, bitch
@ctobtch · 20,312
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 September 2026
Zen of Python
@zen_of_python · 18,760
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 October 2026
NOP::Nuances of Programming
@nuancesprog · 56,141
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
I’m CEO, beach
@imceobeach · 65,228
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
Библиотека программиста
@proglibrary · 77,945
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
Хабр
@habr_com · 133,496
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Журнал «Код»
@thecodemedia · 49,003
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Типичный Сисадмин
@sysodmins · 39,917
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 31 August 2026
Бумажный самолётик
@paperpublic · 41,612
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
GitHub Community
@github · 155,111
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
Уголок программиста
@conhum · 20,535
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
The ExtremeCode Times
@extremecode · 35,684
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
TechNews
@techlucker · 43,332
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
ЖЮ 🖤 Crazy
@videosju · 46,298
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 August 2026
Айтишник | Апи | Технологии
@atishnik · 55,813
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
LAMERLAND - overbafer1
@overlamer1 · 81,140
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Айтишник
@it_teech · 109,822
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 August 2026
Хауди Хо - IT юмор, жизнь программиста
@howdyho_official · 78,136
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
XOR
@xor_journal · 201,181
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
ДЕВОПСИНА | DevOps | Linux
@devopsina · 23,587
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 88 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IT Юмор” (@ithumor), 60,231 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ithumor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.