Это прикол такой? Айтишник с зарплатой 500к+ скидывает за бар в пятницу ровно до копейки 🤦♂️
😁222👍48❤15💩10🔥9

Channel
@ctobtch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,215subscribers
-50 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001572850682 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ctobtch |
| Description | Техдир. Поясняю за IT. По рекламе: @btchmedia Прочие упыри: ❤️ @hrdbtch - дирпопер 🤡 @cpobtch - продакт 🦄 @founderbtch - фаундер 😐 @ceobtch - гендир Регистрация в РКН: https://clck.ru/3R9KF6 |
| Created | 15 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ctobtch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 20,215 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 20,214 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 20,217 | +35 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 20,182 | +13 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 20,169 | -12 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 20,181 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 20,182 | -10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 20,192 | -14 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:29 | 20,206 | -9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:23 | 20,215 | -21 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 20,236 | -13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 20,249 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:11 | 20,253 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:56 | 20,254 | -11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 20,265 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (21 July 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 315,440 |
| Reactions total | 6,798 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,971 reactions across 26 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 4,270 | 61.3% | |
| 🔥 | 507 | 7.27% | |
| custom 5242485713412299371 | 439 | 6.30% | |
| 👍 | 414 | 5.94% | |
| 💩 | 267 | 3.83% | |
| 🎉 | 224 | 3.21% | |
| 🤡 | 224 | 3.21% | |
| custom 5470161491686603218 | 191 | 2.74% | |
| 💯 | 88 | 1.26% | |
| 🤬 | 84 | 1.20% | |
| custom 5361902709232377443 | 71 | 1.02% | |
| ❤ | 58 | 0.832% | |
| custom 5368469400695351161 | 38 | 0.545% | |
| custom 5364066208813424873 | 36 | 0.516% | |
| custom 4983593786413155017 | 35 | 0.502% | |
| 👎 | 21 | 0.301% | |
| 😡 | 4 | 0.057% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,468reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Это прикол такой? Айтишник с зарплатой 500к+ скидывает за бар в пятницу ровно до копейки 🤦♂️
😁222👍48❤15💩10🔥9
#доброеутро техдира) Конец первой серии. Интересно, многие ли из вас сразу догадались, в какую игру играет Варвара? Подписывайтесь, если интересно, чем это закончится.
😁239🤬84🔥22❤12👍11
Разговор о том, что у нас очень медленная разработка 🐌, в нашей компании поднимался ровно один раз. Под Новый год наш главный по продукту Игорь @cpobtch получил себе крутую лычку CPO, начал по всем отделам внедрять OKR, много говорил про цифровую трансформацию и AI-native компанию. А в феврале плотно присел на уши гендиру: «наша доля рынка не растёт, конкуренты поджимают». И виновата была конечно же неэффективная ра…
😁142🔥70custom 536846940069535116138👍20❤8
#вайбкуколдинг Наши финансисты узнали, что импортные разработчики используют особый режим «пещерного человека» при общении с AI. Попросили нас перейти на этот режим, типа так экономится 64% токенов. Мы перешли на «русский матерный». Сэкономили 92% токенов.
😁174👍18custom 524248571341229937114💩3👎1
Чем меньше контора, тем генеральнее директор Классический пример интервью с чётким пацанчиком в руководстве (наши конкуренты, кстати). Тут всё прекрасно. Полное интервью можно у Даниила Лаптева найти на ютубе. 🙂 Рекрутер, которая сидит с выключенной камерой и ничего не говорит на протяжении всего собеседования. Скорее всего, просто молча охреневает от происходящего. 🙂 Нанимающий с ходу спрашивает про достижения...…
😁182💩44👎11💯9🔥5
Какой-то сегодня полоумный день. Поясню по посту Игоря: 1. php же мёртвый язык? Типа как шумерский. Вот поэтому и так дорого %) 2. Максим мой зам. Должен же я своего братюню подогреть денежкой. 3. Любой техдир знает, что девопсов нельзя щемить по зарплате. Чтобы нам всем спать спокойно, когда парни 24/7 всё поднимут, что упало. Так что тут тоже подогреваю денежкой.
😁139💯35custom 524248571341229937129👍5💩4
Кто-то забыл распечатанный файл со всеми зарплатами в офисе. Но не волнуйтесь, я уже сообщил в бухгалтерию, данные не утекли. А вот к зарплатам и плановым повышениям IT есть вопросики: 😡 498 тысяч получают medium программисты на ПХП! Мы что, в 2000-х?! Давайте я буду всё в Claude писать за такие деньги. Оставьте только одного джуна — он будет отлаживать мой код, чтобы работал. 😡 Почему у Максима зарплата больше мо…
😁211custom 524248571341229937137👍11💩3🔥3
#рукойводят Представь: приходишь на работу и видишь у входа такую инсталляцию. Смотришь на эту загадку про два стула пару минут с умным видом — и идёшь работать. А вечером эйчары назначают тебе четыре обязательных тренинга для развития IQ, потому что ты не понял, что это, оказывается, была постановка задачи от руководства!
😁115custom 524248571341229937124💩13👍8🔥4
#богимаркетинга ❌ У нас хуёвый кабель-менеджмент ✅ 👍 Монтаж любой сложности! Увидел на каком-то сайте. Так понравился этот маркетинговый приём (выдавать полнейшую шляпу за сложную работу), что мы теперь официально заявляем: в веб-студии MAZOK мы не спагетти-код пишем, а делаем разработку ЛЮБОЙ СЛОЖНОСТИ!
😁148custom 524248571341229937119🔥12💩7👍3
Уверены, что распознаете хорошего программиста по резюме? Когда-то в интернете был популярен шуточный тест: по фотографии нужно было угадать, кто перед вами — программист или серийный убийца. Тест отлично показал, что люди ужасно справляются с этой задачей и совершают более 80% ошибок. Четыре года назад мы объединились с другими компаниями и рекрутинговыми агентствами, чтобы решить одну «простую» задачу — научиться…
😁79💩64custom 524248571341229937131🔥15👍4
#база Приятно, когда в команде ценят твои слова и дарят мерч с цитатой. Держите ещё в коллекцию: Настоящий тимлид не повышает голос. Настоящий тимлид повышает зарплату. Себе. Чем глубже в Slack, тем толще тролли.
😁179💯33custom 524248571341229937121👍6🔥6
Хороший HR и вопросы на собеседовании интересные. Но давайте кое-что уточним: 1. Без php половина Интернета сломается. 2. C must die (см. статью) 3. Сейчас в моде 1C, давно пора всё на него переписать.
custom 5470161491686603218191😁57custom 498359378641315501730💯8👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @ctobtch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 30,874 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“I’m CTO, bitch” (@ctobtch), 20,215 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ctobtch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.