Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Information Security Memes

Channel

Information Security Memes

@infosecmemes

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,625subscribers

-146 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001110238456
TypeChannel
Username@infosecmemes
DescriptionПо вопросам рекламы и взаимопиара: https://go-friend-go.narod.ru/?infosecmemes Предложить контент - в чатик
Created10 July 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/infosecmemes

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,6199,7719,6956 August 2026 — 9,771 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,771 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,754 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,742 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,732 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,729 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,727 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,719 subscribers8 September 2026 — 9,709 subscribers12 September 2026 — 9,697 subscribers16 September 2026 — 9,694 subscribers25 September 2026 — 9,677 subscribers4 October 2026 — 9,651 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,649 subscribers14 October 2026 — 9,645 subscribers17 October 2026 — 9,649 subscribers20 October 2026 — 9,643 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,639 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,641 subscribers29 October 2026 — 9,632 subscribers1 November 2026 — 9,619 subscribers5 November 2026 — 9,625 subscribers9,6256 August 20265 November 2026
22 measurements spanning 91 days, net -146. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,596–9,794 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 08:089,625+6
1 Nov 2026, 23:469,619-13
29 Oct 2026, 23:159,632-9
27 Oct 2026, 05:019,641+2
23 Oct 2026, 18:479,639-4
20 Oct 2026, 15:069,643-6
17 Oct 2026, 16:369,649+4
14 Oct 2026, 13:069,645-4
11 Oct 2026, 06:409,649-2
4 Oct 2026, 21:179,651-26
25 Sept 2026, 11:399,677-17
16 Sept 2026, 19:569,694-3
12 Sept 2026, 22:389,697-12
8 Sept 2026, 13:169,709-10
3 Sept 2026, 02:379,719-8
31 Aug 2026, 05:379,727-2
28 Aug 2026, 11:239,729-3
25 Aug 2026, 02:549,732-10
15 Aug 2026, 07:499,742-12
11 Aug 2026, 16:319,754first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
909
Videos
39
Links
124

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3,510 reactions across 20 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2,17562.0%
🤣3219.15%
👍1915.44%
🥰1373.90%
💯882.51%
🌚762.17%
❤631.79%
🤡631.79%
🔥521.48%
💅491.40%
🫡441.25%
😎310.883%
🤔230.655%
👎190.541%
😨190.541%
😭190.541%
🌭170.484%
😍130.37%
😱120.342%
🏆110.313%
19 further kinds872.48%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,510 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2025 to 19 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Feb 2026, 22:09 UTC≈9,240 views66 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

spectrum boys

🤣40👍14👎4😍3😁2⚡1❤1🤡1

14 Feb 2026, 18:53 UTC≈11,800 views91 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🥰54🤔13😁9👍5🫡4❤3🐳2🤯1

12 Feb 2026, 11:38 UTC≈11,900 views91 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁59😱12😈10🤔8👎2

9 Feb 2026, 20:23 UTC≈12,900 views197 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁139🥰31🔥14💯7🤡4👏2

7 Feb 2026, 21:51 UTC≈12,400 views122 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍52😁47💯18😭4🤡1

4 Feb 2026, 01:58 UTC≈13,500 views116 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁107😢5🤡3❤1

2 Feb 2026, 18:04 UTC≈11,900 views100 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁84💊7👎6👏2🐳1

28 Dec 2025, 17:11 UTC≈14,100 views103 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💅49😨19❤13🥰13😁5🔥2🤮2

25 Nov 2025, 12:40 UTC≈15,700 views283 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁181👍47💯43🔥5🤡5❤1😭1

24 Nov 2025, 13:45 UTC≈13,600 views150 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍69😁61❤10🌚5👻2🤡2🔥1

15 Nov 2025, 16:16 UTC≈16,900 views240 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁150🤣73❤11❤‍🔥3💩2🌚1

6 Nov 2025, 22:26 UTC≈14,900 views123 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁101❤8🫡8🤡4⚡2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @infosecmemes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Информация опасносте
@alexmakus · 18,755
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 October 2026
vx-underground
@vxunderground · 52,856
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 24 August 2026
Offensive Xwitter
@OffensiveTwitter · 21,289
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 September 2026
Разведка в интернете
@razvedka_v_internete · 36,172
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 2 September 2026
Хакер — Xakep.RU
@xakep_ru · 40,262
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
The Bug Bounty Hunter
@thebugbountyhunter · 52,054
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 25 August 2026
SecAtor
@true_secator · 42,179
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
S.E.Reborn
@S_E_Reborn · 22,461
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 20 September 2026
Russian OSINT
@Russian_OSINT · 48,467
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
Investigation & Forensic TOOLS
@forensictools · 22,593
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026
infosecurity
@tg_infosec · 26,860
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 September 2026
Codeby
@codeby_sec · 37,057
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 September 2026
SecurityLab.ru
@SecLabNews · 86,455
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
IT и безопасность
@tg_security · 26,847
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
Positive Technologies
@Positive_Technologies · 29,423
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
Интернет-Розыск
@irozysk · 45,746
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
infosec
@it_secur · 63,329
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
CyberYozh
@cyberyozh_official · 62,582
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
Пост Лукацкого
@alukatsky · 38,417
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
Пакет Безопасности
@package_security · 33,730
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Social Engineering
@Social_engineering · 124,752
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
Утечки информации
@dataleak · 117,908
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
OSINT mindset
@osint_mindset · 64,860
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
Этичный Хакер
@hack_less · 243,375
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Information Security Memes” (@infosecmemes), 9,625 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infosecmemes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.