Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пакет Безопасности

Channel

Пакет Безопасности

@package_security

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

33,117subscribers

+802 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001720953493
TypeChannel
Username@package_security
DescriptionАвторский канал, где всё полезное из мира IT и ИБ, а также мнение автора сквозь призму кибербеза, аккуратно сложены в Пакет Безопасности. Вопросы – @romanpnn Реклама – @romanpnn0 или telega.in/channels/package_security/card Реестр: clck.ru/3FsiMj
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/package_security

Growth

32,20333,11732,6606 August 2026 — 32,315 subscribers6 August 2026 — 32,318 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,295 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,279 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,242 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,224 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,207 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,203 subscribers13 August 2026 — 32,285 subscribers14 August 2026 — 32,339 subscribers16 August 2026 — 32,341 subscribers17 August 2026 — 32,346 subscribers18 August 2026 — 32,438 subscribers19 August 2026 — 32,911 subscribers20 August 2026 — 33,089 subscribers22 August 2026 — 33,117 subscribers6 August 202622 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 16 days, net +802. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,066–33,254 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 06:2833,117+28
20 Aug 2026, 22:0333,089+178
19 Aug 2026, 19:5232,911+473
18 Aug 2026, 17:5232,438+92
17 Aug 2026, 15:2832,346+5
16 Aug 2026, 07:5332,341+2
14 Aug 2026, 19:4632,339+54
13 Aug 2026, 12:3532,285+82
12 Aug 2026, 15:2632,203-4
11 Aug 2026, 18:0332,207-17
10 Aug 2026, 20:1732,224-18
9 Aug 2026, 21:1232,242-37
8 Aug 2026, 18:2132,279-16
7 Aug 2026, 15:2432,295-23
6 Aug 2026, 14:2132,318+3
6 Aug 2026, 08:2132,315first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.8%
avg views ÷ 33,117 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,240
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.888%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held34 (28 July 202623 August 2026)
Views total178,060
Reactions total1,582
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
668
Videos
74
Links
1,270

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 12s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,422 reactions across 32 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
26318.5%
🤣24417.2%
😁23716.7%
👍20614.5%
🔥1409.85%
🤯704.92%
💯634.43%
👀302.11%
😈191.34%
👏161.13%
🎉110.774%
🐳110.774%
100.703%
🤩80.563%
🍾70.492%
😭70.492%
🥰70.492%
60.422%
😍60.422%
😎60.422%
19 further kinds553.87%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,582reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 34 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @package_security. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,650 views28 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Знали бы вы, как я не люблю писать воскресные дайджесты с телефона. Но именно ради вас я решил, что надо иногда переступать через свое «не хочу». Поэтому, хотите вы этого или нет, дайджест читать теперь придется. ⚡️ Пытаемся понять, стал ли уже ваш роутер частью ботнета – ссылка ⚡️ Как Apple публично призналась в том, что айфон взломать стало слишком просто – ссылка 🧠 Вышло новое мок-интервью по направлению AppSec

17🔥8👍3

21 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC≈3,240 views28 reactions1 Starread 23 August 2026

Рынок порешал? Когда-то я вам рассказывал о том, как сервера Rockstar Games взломали хакеры, которые так и не получили свой выкуп в питкоинах. Там все закончилось тем, что данные в итоге утекли в сеть, весь мир узнал, сколько денег приносит GTA 5 и GTA Online, а акции компании полетели вверх, потому что инвесторов это только убедило в том, что компания перспективная. Так вот, рынок порешал, и теперь стоимость акций

😁17👍43🔥3👏1

21 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC≈3,740 views110 reactionsread 23 August 2026

В Удмуртии сотрудники Сбера помогли найти пропавшую девочку, которую мошенники под видом спецслужб вывели из дома ночью. Неизвестные позвонили ребёнку, представились сотрудниками силовых структур и дали инструкции. Девочка взяла телефоны родителей и ушла из дома, связь с ней пропала. Полиция начала поиски, мама обратилась в удмуртское отделение банка. Служба безопасности заблокировала карты родителей — чтобы мошенн

👍71🤯21124👏2

20 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC≈4,220 views115 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Как думаете, безопасно? Можно переходить по ссылке? ⚡ ПБ | 😎 Чат | 🛍 Проекты | 📹 YT

😁97💯112👏2🤣2🏆1

19 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC≈4,800 views30 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Видели, кстати? В эппл научились детектить заражение своих устройств на iOS. Если система заметит что-то аномальное и подозрительное, но вам пришлют соответствующее уведомление. Раньше заразить айфон было роскошью для плохих ребят или тех, кто хочет получить удаленный доступ к устройству жертвы. Под ударом были преимущественно политики, люди из силовых структур и СМИ. А сейчас, только за последнее время и только в

🤯19👀4🤗43

18 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC≈6,040 views97 reactionsread 23 August 2026

А твой домашний роутер уже стал частью ботнета? Дано: вы купили роутер, вотĸнули в сеть, ввели пароль от провайдера, повесили в коридоре и забыли о нем на несколько лет. Пароль на саму админĸу не меняли, прошивка осталась заводская. Про обновления системы даже не вспоминали (правильно, это техника должна служить тебе, а не ты – технике). Итого: поздравляю, вы собрали универсального солдата для армии ботнета. Ну а

47👍24👏11😁7🎉4🙈2👎1🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC≈13,300 views113 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Video

Как работает антивирус. #КиберМем ⚡ ПБ | 😎 Чат | 🛍 Проекты | 📹 YT

🤣101💯64👍2

17 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC≈5,750 views19 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Ну кто не любит хорошее исследование? «Квадрант Технологий» (aka импортозамещенный Gartner) представили нам на днях первое исследование из своего цикла «Матрица...импортозамещения». Давно в этом канале не было такого слова и вот опять. Посмотрим, что тут есть интересного. Товарищи-эксперты изучили несколько наших отечественных SOC-центров и опросили их клиентов – как им вообще обслуживание, насколько хорошо у ИБ-вен

👍6🔥64😁2🤔1

16 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC≈5,630 views26 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, друзья. В этот раз будет мини-воскресный дайджест, потому что я в пути, а событий было не так уж и много. Так что погнали. ⚡️ Разбираемся, что делать с вайбкодерами и как им помочь – ссылка 👨‍🏫 В нашем канале по Менторству ИБ вот-вот случится юбилей аж на 3 000 человек! 📹 Ну а на Ютубе юбилей уже случился. Так за год активного ведения канала у нас вышло набрать аж 4 000 подписчиков!!! 🧠 А еще ходят слухи,

🔥187👾1

15 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC≈5,740 views20 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Мы тут с вами стали специальными партнерами премии «Инженерное искусство» – для тех, кто не просто «поддерживает айтишку», а реально строит, развивает и защищает корпоративное ИТ. Номинаций всего шесть: — Архитектор системы — Инженер инноваций — Инженер восстановления — Инженер инфраструктуры — Инженер безопасности — Лидер инженерной команды Пройдет премия в рамках конференции IT Elements 2026. Там же (9 сентября)

7🔥6🍾5🐳2

14 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC≈6,300 views51 reactionsread 23 August 2026

На меня тут вышла пресс-служба DDX. Говорят, что уже проводят внутреннюю проверку по инциденту и обещают скоро вернуться с подробным пресс-релизом по ситуации ⌨️

👍35😁103🫡2🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC≈6,840 views69 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Вы мне одно скажите, DDX в итоге взломали или нет? Мне пластическую операцию делать или нет? А то там биометрии больше, чем в банках.

🤣54💯123

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @package_security. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 7,808 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CyberYozh
@cyberyozh_official · 62,423
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
Отдел К: IT-технологии, кибербезопасность
@cyber_cabb · 81,748
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
Троянский конь | IT, технологии
@trojan_anonym · 64,902
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
infosec
@it_secur · 61,174
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Этичный Хакер
@hack_less · 228,029
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
Life-Hack - Хакер
@haccking · 63,208
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
Social Engineering
@Social_engineering · 125,151
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
OSINT mindset
@osint_mindset · 64,518
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
SecurityLab.ru
@SecLabNews · 83,697
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пакет Безопасности” (@package_security), 33,117 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/package_security.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.