Channel
@lab_hack
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,799subscribers
-123 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001822391833 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lab_hack |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lab_hack |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 25,799 | -11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 25,810 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 25,819 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 25,818 | -10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:58 | 25,828 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 25,834 | -16 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 25,850 | -7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 25,857 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 25,862 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 25,871 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 25,881 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 25,892 | -16 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 25,908 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 25,913 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 25,922 | first reading |
35 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (19 July 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 57,384 |
| Reactions total | 301 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
342 reactions across 35 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 89 | 26.0% | |
| ❤ | 64 | 18.7% | |
| 👎 | 62 | 18.1% | |
| ⚡ | 39 | 11.4% | |
| 🆒 | 39 | 11.4% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 3.22% | |
| 🖕 | 10 | 2.92% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 1.46% | |
| 🌭 | 4 | 1.17% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 0.877% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 0.877% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.585% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.585% | |
| 😇 | 2 | 0.585% | |
| 😡 | 2 | 0.585% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.585% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.292% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.292% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.292% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 342reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🖥 Репозиторий: GhostTrack — инструмент для OSINT-разведки, геолокации и сбора информации об IP-адресах и номерах телефонов GhostTrack — это консольная утилита на языке Python, предназначенная для автоматизации сбора географических и сетевых данных из открытых источников. — Инструмент позволяет извлекать общедоступные метаданные о сетевых провайдерах, операторах связи, географическом расположении IP-адресов и кодах …
👍2🆒1
📖 Книга: «Linux в действии» — Дэвид Клинтон Это практическая книга по администрированию Linux, ориентированная не столько на изучение команд, сколько на решение реальных задач. Для cybersecurity эта книга интересна тем, что формирует Linux-фундамент, без которого сложно нормально заниматься пентестингом, malware analysis, DevSecOps или эксплуатацией инфраструктуры. Отдельная глава посвящена защите веб-сервера, а е…
🖕5❤3👎3👍1😡1🆒1
🖥 Репозиторий: OpenSSL — криптографическая библиотека и реализация TLS/DTLS/QUIC OpenSSL — это фундаментальный open-source криптографический и TLS/SSL toolkit, используемый для защиты сетевых соединений, работы с сертификатами, криптографическими алгоритмами и протоколами TLS, DTLS и QUIC. Его используют как непосредственно разработчики приложений, так и операционные системы, серверы, VPN, почтовые системы и сетево…
👍3⚡2❤2🆒2
🖥 Репозиторий: BettaFish — мультиагентная система для OSINT, анализа информационной среды и Deep Research BettaFish — это не просто AI-чат или агрегатор новостей, а целый pipeline, в котором несколько специализированных агентов собирают и анализируют информацию, после чего объединяют результаты в единый аналитический отчёт. Автор заявляет поддержку 30+ социальных платформ и миллионов публичных комментариев. — Прое…
⚡3👍3🆒3❤1
📖 Книга: Изучаем Kali Linux. Проверка защиты, тестирование на проникновение, этичный хакинг Обновленное практическое руководство по использованию специализированного дистрибутива Kali Linux для проведения комплексного аудита безопасности, этичного хакинга и подготовки к профильным сертификациям (Автор: Рик Мессье, 2025). Систематизированное практическое пособие и самоучитель, предназначенный для системных администр…
❤4🖕2👎1🔥1😡1
🖥 Репозиторий: OWASP Juice Shop — уязвимое веб-приложение для обучения пентестингу Juice Shop — это полноценный интернет-магазин, намеренно реализованный с большим количеством уязвимостей. Его основная ценность в том, что это не набор отдельных лабораторных задач, а функционирующее приложение с frontend, backend, API, базой данных и различными механизмами авторизации. Набор challenges значительно шире классическог…
👍4⚡1😁1🆒1
🖥 Репозиторий: TrendRadar — интеллектуальный мониторинг информационного поля и трендов TrendRadar — это инструмент для автоматизированного сбора, анализа и фильтрации новостной информации. Его основная задача — убрать информационный шум и оставить только те события и темы, которые соответствуют заданным пользователем интересам. Важное отличие от обычного RSS-агрегатора — TrendRadar пытается анализировать динамику и…
🔥3🆒2❤1
📖 Книга: Вторжение. Краткая история русских хакеров Документальное журналистское расследование истории становления, эволюции и мирового влияния русскоязычного хакерского андеграунда. Масштабная историческая хроника и серия расследований, предназначенная для читателей, интересующихся кибербезопасностью, историей технологий, геополитикой и феноменом феномена киберпреступности в постсоветском пространстве. Основные т…
👎5🆒3🖕2⚡1❤1🤬1😁1
🖥 Репозиторий: OpenClaw — self-hosted AI-агент с инструментами, каналами связи и автоматизацией OpenClaw — это платформа для создания постоянно работающего персонального AI-агента, который связывает LLM с локальной системой, внешними сервисами и мессенджерами. — Если обычный LLM в основном возвращает текст, агент с инструментами способен читать данные, обращаться к сервисам и выполнять действия от имени пользовател…
❤4⚡1
🖥 Репозиторий: Scrapling — адаптивный фреймворк для Web Scraping и Crawling Scrapling — это современный адаптивный Python-фреймворк для web scraping и crawling, рассчитанный как на получение данных с отдельных страниц, так и на масштабный многопоточный сбор информации. — Проект особенно интересен тем, что умеет адаптироваться к изменениям структуры сайтов и работать с динамическими страницами. Его можно использова…
👍4🆒1
🖥 Репозиторий: Magisk — фреймворк для root-доступа и модификации Android Magisk — это набор инструментов для получения и управления root-доступом, модификации Android без прямого изменения системных разделов, работы с boot-образами и загрузки собственного кода в процессы приложений. Magisk — это не просто «программа для root». Исходный код представляет интерес для изучения: • Android boot process • Linux namespaces…
👍3🆒3⚡2😇2❤1
📖 Книга: Непрерывное развертывание ПО. Автоматизация процессов сборки, тестирования и внедрения новых версий ПО Фундаментальное руководство по созданию автоматизированных сборочных конвейеров (deployment pipelines), управлению конфигурациями и организации частых, надежных релизов без простоя. Фундаментальная настольная книга по методологии Continuous Delivery (CD), предназначение которой — стать главным справочнико…
👎3🆒3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @lab_hack. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 769,312 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лаборатория хакера” (@lab_hack), 25,799 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lab_hack.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.