Сервис для видеосвязи Простой сервис Яндекс.Телемост позволяет самостоятельно организовывать встречи любой продолжительности и присоединяться к чужим по ссылке, действующей 24 часа. Во встрече могут участвовать до 40 человек. Сервис позволяет общаться в чате, вести запись, расшаривать экран – словом, делать все то, что мы привыкли, используя топовые инструменты для видеозвонков. У Телемоста есть не только веб-верси…

Channel
CMD | IT
@cmd_it
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,323subscribers
-339 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001267994341 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cmd_it |
| Description | Новости IT, Безопасность в сети, Социальная инженерия. Ссылка: @Portal_v_IT Сотрудничество: @oleginc, @tatiana_inc Купить рекламу: telega.in/c/cmd_it РКН: clck.ru/3Jb78b |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cmd_it |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 12:36 | 24,323 | -52 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 23:22 | 24,375 | -42 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 24,417 | -9 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 24,426 | -11 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:59 | 24,437 | -6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 24,443 | -16 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 24,459 | -17 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 24,476 | -20 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:02 | 24,496 | -12 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 24,508 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 24,509 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 24,511 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 24,518 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:09 | 24,527 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 24,534 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 24,540 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 24,543 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 24,545 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 24,550 | -6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 24,556 | first reading |
Engagement
148 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.30%
- avg views ÷ 24,323 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 560
- 47 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.166%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 47
- of 148 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 47 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 148 (30 July 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 26,318 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 12:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,630
- Videos
- ≈603
- Links
- ≈4,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 54s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
81 reactions across 62 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 69 | 85.2% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 8.64% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 6.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 148 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 148 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 0.676%
- 1 of 148 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 447
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 679
- over 147 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFHPtacR | 1 | 1 September 2026 | 1 September 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 148 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
«Альфа-Банк» выпустил стикер на смартфон для бесконтактной оплаты покупок за 590 рублей «Альфа-Банк» вслед за «Тинькофф Банком» и" Сбером" выпустил свой стикер на смартфоны клиентов для бесконтактной оплаты покупок. Первые 10 тыс. стикеров «Альфа-Банк» раздаст бесплатно. Для остальных клиентов стоимость платёжного стикера составит 590 рублей. Вам нравится рубрика новостей? 👍 — Да! 👎 — Нет.. CMD
❤1
Posted without readable text
Не совершай ЭТУ ошибку! Замечаю, что многие читают 5–10 крупных tech-каналов, думая, что этого хватает, чтобы развиваться в сфере. Большие ресурсы действительно хороши для общей картины. Но они работают на широкую аудиторию, поэтому редкие идеи, интересные кейсы и уникальные новости не всегда доходят до них. Настоящая практика обычно зарождается в небольших нишевых каналах, а крупные медиа уже подхватывают их и цит…
Объединяем все данные в одном месте Coda — сервис, который позволяет визуализировать абсолютно любые процессы в компании. То, для чего раньше требовался десяток приложений (от Excel до Trello или Asana), теперь доступно в одном месте. Вы сможете создать документы и добавлять в них голосования, таблицы, различные графики, карточки канбан (один из методов управления разработкой) и так далее. Всё это в интересном и о…
Ищем человека в соцсетях по фото Search4faces — это бесплатный сервис для поиска по лицам в соцсетях. Можно искать не только по фотографии, но и по любому другому изображению человеческого лица. Например, по рисунку или фотороботу. Нейронки и машинное обучение находят нужного человека в течение нескольких секунд! Результат — ссылка на нужный профиль в vk.com или ok.ru. CMD
Posted without readable text
Определяем владельцев номера Getcontact наделал много шума в сентябре 2021-го. Людей сильно зацепила возможность определить владельцев номеров и узнать, как контакт записан в адресной книге других пользователей. Но есть проблема: приложение собирает персонализированные данные. Хочешь того или нет, люди видят, как ты записан в чужих телефонных книгах. Эта инфа дает много данных, которые формируют полное представлени…
❤1
Создаём опросы SurveyLegend — сервис для создания опросов с дизайном, аналитикой и т.д. Создали его ребята из Швеции. Создавайте опросы, формы, анкеты, голосования, вопросники, NPS, оценки удовлетворенности клиентов, опыта клиентов, удовлетворенности сотрудников. Использовать можно хоть с планшета, хоть с ПК. Можно задать свой дизайн, смотреть подробную аналитику по ответам. Интуитивно понятный интерфейс и всё это…
👨💻 Фронтенд с AI: что можно делегировать агентам 5 октября, стартует конференция Podlodka Frontend Crew — сезон о том, как применять AI во фронтенд-разработке на практике. Участники конференции узнают: • Как находить prompt injection и противостоять таким атакам; • Какие подходы помогают повысить доверие к результатам агентской разработки; • Как проводить ревью кода, созданного AI-агентами; • Как AI помогает упро…
Настраиваем электронную почту С помощью Sidemail вы сможете легко создавать, интегрировать, отправлять, автоматизировать и анализировать свои электронные письма. Достаточно выбрать красивый дизайн почты, который можно полностью настроить - загрузить логотип, выбрать правильные цвета и свой любимый шрифт. Сервис построен на инфраструктуре Amazon AWS и использует почтовые серверы Amazon, что означает высоконадежную …
Конструируем логотипы с помощью ИИ Инструмент Launchaco со скоростью света создаст логотип для вашей компании. Он идеально подходит для стартапов, у которых нет бюджета или времени на создание логотипа. Инструмент с открытым исходным кодом который не требует регистрации. CMD
Showing the 12 most recent of 148 posts we hold for @cmd_it. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@cmd_it edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 7 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@gitmedia · 587 postsНаходки Программиста
@aliexpress_prg · 21,7272 postsARGO.TECH
@argo_technology_ist · 2241 postСайтология | Психология продаж и интерфейсов
@ArtemMill · 651 postBRAVADA DAILY | НОВОСТИ
@bravada_daily · 421 postChatty - English Tutor
@ChattyEnglishBot · 60,4141 post+Ai в маркетинге Рубцовой
@julie_she_ai · 1,4781 postNeuroX Market
@NeuroXMarket · 11 postNeuroX Market Отзывы
@NeuroXMarketReviews · 41 postВайб-кодинг
@vibecoding_tg · 63,6091 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@black_triangle_tg · 63,815#1
@open_source_friend · 52,333#2
@sysadmin_library · 25,522#3
@pcTeapot · 39,539#4
@porscode_tg · 28,353#5
@codelearning_tg · 9,323#6
@cmd_cv · 53,506#7
@PushEnter · 91,133#8
@itles_tg · 15,953#9
@codeby_sec · 37,047#10
@openit_tg · 34,905#11
@it_sensei · 11,140#12
@knijnoe_xranilishe · 19,600#13
@it_tochka · 18,042#14
@github · 155,595#15
@exploitex · 2,048,192#16
@bugfeature · 567,657#17
@whackdoor · 1,586,239#18
@pekagame · 1,086,484#19
@codecamp · 180,250#20
@Social_engineering · 124,999#21
@remedia · 691,788#22
@bugnotfeature · 1,082,483#23
@rozetked · 666,897#24
@d_code · 405,436#25
@naebnet · 2,201,589#26
@howdyho_official · 78,530#27
@itmemes · 122,995#28
@KladovkaPavlu · 64,986#29
@techno_media · 778,069#30
@haccking · 63,140#31
@developer_shelf · 26,796#32
@wind_community · 41,159#33
@it_secur · 62,254#34
@the_windows · 16,122#35
@elliot_cybersec · 38,849#36
@mediatrends · 587,100#37
@python2day · 63,715#38
@overlamer1 · 81,307#39
@SecLabNews · 84,790#40
@it_guides · 15,170#41
@S_E_Reborn · 22,399#42
@S_E_Book · 23,139#43
@media1337 · 1,136,259#44
@pda_4 · 88,233#45
@admguides · 11,960#46
@it_academy_tg · 12,646#47
@proglibrary · 78,238#48
@nsis_cybersec · 21,516#49
@programmer_memes · 51,106#50
@tproger · 78,074#51
@porscode_archive · 9,701#52
@devops_sc · 14,824#53
@denissexy · 137,955#54
@lab_hack · 25,611#55
@TaskNoFace · 29,406#56
@cyberins · 11,609#57
@exploit_live · 3,999#58
@linuxkalii · 55,481#59
@IT_Portal · 99,777#60
@tg_infosec · 26,761#61
@sitodel · 25,662#62
@code_m0de · 10,778#63
@nuancesprog · 56,362#64
@Russian_OSINT · 47,997#65
@pylinux0 · 11,043#66
@kharchevnikov · 121,676#67
@bzd_channel · 36,381#68
@seniorpy · 39,657#69
@sysodmins · 38,258#70
@cyberyozh_academy · 15,367#71
@os_linux_ru · 19,602#72
@infosec_globe · 18,057#73
@i_odmin · 26,681#74
@overbafer1 · 63,451#75
@retra · 165,646#76
@dataleak · 118,872#77
@true_secator · 41,782#78
@progeri · 15,089#79
@EnglishScript · 44,988#80
@linux_education · 11,106#81
@school_network · 26,560#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@pcTeapot · 39,539
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 30 August 2026
@porscode_tg · 28,353
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
@cmd_cv · 53,506
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
@cyberbezopasno · 57,544
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 26 August 2026
@wind_community · 41,159
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 29 August 2026
@termuxplz0x41 · 32,678
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 4 September 2026
@trojan_anonym · 64,451
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
@sysadmin_library · 25,522
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026
@github · 155,595
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
@remontka_pro · 26,206
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 September 2026
@overlamer1 · 81,307
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
@TaskNoFace · 29,406
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
@sitodel · 25,662
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
@cyber_cabb · 81,563
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
@procode404 · 40,474
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
@EnglishScript · 44,988
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CMD | IT” (@cmd_it), 24,323 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cmd_it.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.